Yuming Chong , Yilin Li , Xiaojun Wang , Nanze Yu , Jiuzuo Huang , Hairu Cao , Wenyun Ting , Xiao Long
{"title":"Development and validation of the Chinese version of the Clinician-reported submental fat rating scale","authors":"Yuming Chong , Yilin Li , Xiaojun Wang , Nanze Yu , Jiuzuo Huang , Hairu Cao , Wenyun Ting , Xiao Long","doi":"10.1016/j.cjprs.2024.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Excess submental fat (SMF) is a common facial aesthetic concern, and assessment scales play a crucial role in its evaluation. Existing SMF scales are based on Caucasian populations, although genetic background significantly influences SMF distribution. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a 5-point Chinese version of the Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (CR-SMFRS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study included 150 volunteers, and captured photographs from the frontal, oblique, and lateral views were combined for each participant. A 5-point scale with descriptive criteria was primarily designed. Internal validation involved three experienced plastic surgeons, while external validation was conducted on 50 live volunteers by six additional raters. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A 5-point grading system with descriptive criteria was developed and validated as the Chinese CR-SMFRS. Internal validation demonstrated a good intra- and inter-rater consistency. During external validation, intraclass correlation coefficient values for each rater exceeded 0.850, indicating high intra-rater consistency. Moreover, the inter-rater reliability showed good consistency.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Chinese version of the SMF rating scale is a reliable tool for clinical use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":65600,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"7 1","pages":"Pages 1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096691124001092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Excess submental fat (SMF) is a common facial aesthetic concern, and assessment scales play a crucial role in its evaluation. Existing SMF scales are based on Caucasian populations, although genetic background significantly influences SMF distribution. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a 5-point Chinese version of the Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (CR-SMFRS).
Methods
The study included 150 volunteers, and captured photographs from the frontal, oblique, and lateral views were combined for each participant. A 5-point scale with descriptive criteria was primarily designed. Internal validation involved three experienced plastic surgeons, while external validation was conducted on 50 live volunteers by six additional raters. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were assessed.
Results
A 5-point grading system with descriptive criteria was developed and validated as the Chinese CR-SMFRS. Internal validation demonstrated a good intra- and inter-rater consistency. During external validation, intraclass correlation coefficient values for each rater exceeded 0.850, indicating high intra-rater consistency. Moreover, the inter-rater reliability showed good consistency.
Conclusion
The Chinese version of the SMF rating scale is a reliable tool for clinical use.