Low antimüllerian hormone (<1.2 ng/ml) does not impact oocyte quality and IVF/ICSI outcomes in women ≤40 years old

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ming-Ju Wang , Ming-Huei Lin , Jia-Hwa Yang , Robert Kuo-Kuang Lee , Kuan-Sheng Lee
{"title":"Low antimüllerian hormone (<1.2 ng/ml) does not impact oocyte quality and IVF/ICSI outcomes in women ≤40 years old","authors":"Ming-Ju Wang ,&nbsp;Ming-Huei Lin ,&nbsp;Jia-Hwa Yang ,&nbsp;Robert Kuo-Kuang Lee ,&nbsp;Kuan-Sheng Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.tjog.2024.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study retrospectively investigates whether diminished ovarian reserve (DOR), as measured by serum anti-müllerian hormone (AMH), impacts oocyte quality and IVF/ICSI outcomes in the cleavage embryo or blastocyst stage or not.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed 1677 women aged ≤40 years who underwent 1862 IVF/ICSI cycles and divided patients into two groups: low-AMH included the patients with AMH levels &lt;1.2 ng/ml, and normal-AMH included the patients with AMH values ≥1.2 ng/ml. Ovarian stimulation response till fertilization condition and fresh transfer outcomes were compared between the two groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The cancellation rate was significantly higher in the low-AMH group than in the normal-AMH group (12.6 % vs 2.2 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The MII oocyte retrieval and available embryos were significantly higher in the normal-AMH group than in the low-AMH group. There were no significant differences in the implantation rates (IR), miscarriage rate (MR) and live birth rate (LBR) in cleavage embryo transfer (IR:20.90 % vs 21.59 %, <em>p</em> = 0.787; MR:18.8 % vs 22.3 %, <em>p</em> = 0.543; LBR:29.3 % vs 30.9 %, <em>p</em> = 0.686) and blastocyst transfer (IR:43.92 % vs 44.09 %, <em>p</em> = 0.819; MR:6.7 % vs 15.8 %, <em>p</em> = 0.486; LBR:48.1 % vs 45.1 %, <em>p</em> = 0.758) between the two groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Ovarian reserve, measured by circulating AMH, correlates with cycle cancellation rate and predicts the recovery of oocyte numbers and available embryos after conventional ovarian hyperstimulation but not oocyte quality or IVF/ICSI outcomes in women ≤40 years old.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div>The study protocol was retrospectively registered and was approved by Institutional Review Board of Mackay Memorial Hospital (21MMHIS219e) on August 26, 2021.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49449,"journal":{"name":"Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"64 2","pages":"Pages 248-252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S102845592500021X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study retrospectively investigates whether diminished ovarian reserve (DOR), as measured by serum anti-müllerian hormone (AMH), impacts oocyte quality and IVF/ICSI outcomes in the cleavage embryo or blastocyst stage or not.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed 1677 women aged ≤40 years who underwent 1862 IVF/ICSI cycles and divided patients into two groups: low-AMH included the patients with AMH levels <1.2 ng/ml, and normal-AMH included the patients with AMH values ≥1.2 ng/ml. Ovarian stimulation response till fertilization condition and fresh transfer outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results

The cancellation rate was significantly higher in the low-AMH group than in the normal-AMH group (12.6 % vs 2.2 %, p < 0.001). The MII oocyte retrieval and available embryos were significantly higher in the normal-AMH group than in the low-AMH group. There were no significant differences in the implantation rates (IR), miscarriage rate (MR) and live birth rate (LBR) in cleavage embryo transfer (IR:20.90 % vs 21.59 %, p = 0.787; MR:18.8 % vs 22.3 %, p = 0.543; LBR:29.3 % vs 30.9 %, p = 0.686) and blastocyst transfer (IR:43.92 % vs 44.09 %, p = 0.819; MR:6.7 % vs 15.8 %, p = 0.486; LBR:48.1 % vs 45.1 %, p = 0.758) between the two groups.

Conclusions

Ovarian reserve, measured by circulating AMH, correlates with cycle cancellation rate and predicts the recovery of oocyte numbers and available embryos after conventional ovarian hyperstimulation but not oocyte quality or IVF/ICSI outcomes in women ≤40 years old.

Trial registration

The study protocol was retrospectively registered and was approved by Institutional Review Board of Mackay Memorial Hospital (21MMHIS219e) on August 26, 2021.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
23.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology is a peer-reviewed journal and open access publishing editorials, reviews, original articles, short communications, case reports, research letters, correspondence and letters to the editor in the field of obstetrics and gynecology. The aims of the journal are to: 1.Publish cutting-edge, innovative and topical research that addresses screening, diagnosis, management and care in women''s health 2.Deliver evidence-based information 3.Promote the sharing of clinical experience 4.Address women-related health promotion The journal provides comprehensive coverage of topics in obstetrics & gynecology and women''s health including maternal-fetal medicine, reproductive endocrinology/infertility, and gynecologic oncology. Taiwan Association of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信