Would senior citizens get vaccinated against RSV? Exploratory analysis using a novel survey instrument

Q3 Medicine
Mohammad Abu-Ghosh , Dareen Saleh , Joud Al-Haddad , Leen Sabbah , Raghad Alnusairat , Muna Barakat , Malik Sallam
{"title":"Would senior citizens get vaccinated against RSV? Exploratory analysis using a novel survey instrument","authors":"Mohammad Abu-Ghosh ,&nbsp;Dareen Saleh ,&nbsp;Joud Al-Haddad ,&nbsp;Leen Sabbah ,&nbsp;Raghad Alnusairat ,&nbsp;Muna Barakat ,&nbsp;Malik Sallam","doi":"10.1016/j.vacun.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the attitude of senior citizens towards the newly approved respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccines using a novel survey instrument specifically tailored for this purpose.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Based on a literature review on vaccination attitude towards respiratory viruses (SARS-CoV-2 and influenza), 15 items were tested for content, face, and construct validity. Data collection nvolved face-to-face interviews among individuals aged 50 years or older in Jordan during May–June 2024. Construct validity was assessed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) based on principal component analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 231 respondents formed the final sample. The EFA showed that 5 constructs explained 71.9% of the variance in attitude to RSV vaccination. These constructs were labeled Fear, Information, Accessibility, Benefit, and Conspiracy. The acceptance of a safe and effective RSV vaccine if provided free-of-charge was observed among 55.4% of the participants (<em>n</em> = 128), while 16.0% were hesitant (<em>n</em> = 37), and 28.6% were resistant (<em>n</em> = 66). Applying the 5 RSV vaccine attitude constructs, demographic data, and vaccination history into the multivariate analysis, a higher RSV vaccine acceptance was found among elderly individuals with lower monthly incomes, a history of higher vaccine uptake, agreement with the Benefit construct, and disagreement with the Fear construct.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study developed an initial survey instrument to assess the attitudes of senior citizens towards the newly approved RSV vaccines. Further testing across diverse settings is necessary to evaluate the barriers and motivators influencing attitude to RSV vaccination. This effort is crucial to reduce the burden of RSV disease among the elderly.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53407,"journal":{"name":"Vacunas","volume":"26 1","pages":"Article 100384"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vacunas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1576988724001055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess the attitude of senior citizens towards the newly approved respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccines using a novel survey instrument specifically tailored for this purpose.

Material and methods

Based on a literature review on vaccination attitude towards respiratory viruses (SARS-CoV-2 and influenza), 15 items were tested for content, face, and construct validity. Data collection nvolved face-to-face interviews among individuals aged 50 years or older in Jordan during May–June 2024. Construct validity was assessed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) based on principal component analysis.

Results

A total of 231 respondents formed the final sample. The EFA showed that 5 constructs explained 71.9% of the variance in attitude to RSV vaccination. These constructs were labeled Fear, Information, Accessibility, Benefit, and Conspiracy. The acceptance of a safe and effective RSV vaccine if provided free-of-charge was observed among 55.4% of the participants (n = 128), while 16.0% were hesitant (n = 37), and 28.6% were resistant (n = 66). Applying the 5 RSV vaccine attitude constructs, demographic data, and vaccination history into the multivariate analysis, a higher RSV vaccine acceptance was found among elderly individuals with lower monthly incomes, a history of higher vaccine uptake, agreement with the Benefit construct, and disagreement with the Fear construct.

Conclusions

This study developed an initial survey instrument to assess the attitudes of senior citizens towards the newly approved RSV vaccines. Further testing across diverse settings is necessary to evaluate the barriers and motivators influencing attitude to RSV vaccination. This effort is crucial to reduce the burden of RSV disease among the elderly.
老年人会接种呼吸道合胞病毒疫苗吗?一种新型测量仪器的探索性分析
目的采用专门设计的新型调查仪器,了解老年人对新批准的呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)疫苗的态度。材料与方法在查阅有关呼吸道病毒(SARS-CoV-2和流感)疫苗接种态度的文献的基础上,对15个条目进行内容、面效度和结构效度检验。数据收集包括在2024年5月至6月期间对约旦50岁 或以上的个人进行面对面访谈。采用基于主成分分析的探索性因子分析(EFA)评估结构效度。结果最终样本共231人。EFA显示,5个构式解释了对RSV疫苗接种态度差异的71.9%。这些构念被标记为恐惧、信息、可及性、利益和阴谋。55.4%的参与者接受免费提供安全有效的RSV疫苗(n = 128),16.0%的参与者犹豫不决(n = 37),28.6%的参与者耐药(n = 66)。将5种RSV疫苗态度构式、人口统计数据和疫苗接种史纳入多变量分析,发现月收入较低、疫苗接种史较高、符合受益构式、不符合恐惧构式的老年人接受RSV疫苗的程度较高。结论本研究开发了一种初步的调查工具来评估老年人对新批准的RSV疫苗的态度。有必要在不同环境中进行进一步的测试,以评估影响对RSV疫苗接种态度的障碍和动机。这一努力对于减轻老年人呼吸道合胞病毒疾病的负担至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vacunas
Vacunas Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
138
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Sin duda una de las mejores publicaciones para conocer los avances en el campo de las vacunaciones preventivas, tanto en el ámbito de la investigación básica como aplicada y en la evaluación de programas de vacunaciones. Su alta calidad y utilidad la ha llevado a estar indexada en los prestigiosos índices IME y SCOPUS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信