Evaluation of LigB polymerase chain reaction as a complementary tool to microscopic agglutination test for the detection of bovine leptospirosis in serum samples
{"title":"Evaluation of LigB polymerase chain reaction as a complementary tool to microscopic agglutination test for the detection of bovine leptospirosis in serum samples","authors":"Vanina Saraullo , Micaela Hamer , Micaela Esteban , Cristina Sanchez , Bibiana Brihuega , Mara Martinez","doi":"10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Leptospirosis is a significant infectious disease affecting livestock. Microscopic agglutination test (MAT) is used as the gold standard; however, the inclusion of molecular tools (PCR) could improve the accuracy of diagnosis. We evaluated the combination of MAT and a LigB-PCR in bovine serum to detect positive cases in animals clinically suspected of leptospirosis. 127 samples were classified by MAT (cut-off 1:100). Of 45 negative samples negative by MAT, 42.2 % were positive by PCR. In addition, the number of confirmed cases of bovine leptospirosis based on clinical suspicion and MAT and/or PCR increased the diagnostic rate to 79.5 %. LigB-PCR can detect traces of leptospiral DNA in serum with negative or low antibody titers and could be used as a complementary tool to MAT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21083,"journal":{"name":"Research in veterinary science","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 105602"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528825000761","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Leptospirosis is a significant infectious disease affecting livestock. Microscopic agglutination test (MAT) is used as the gold standard; however, the inclusion of molecular tools (PCR) could improve the accuracy of diagnosis. We evaluated the combination of MAT and a LigB-PCR in bovine serum to detect positive cases in animals clinically suspected of leptospirosis. 127 samples were classified by MAT (cut-off 1:100). Of 45 negative samples negative by MAT, 42.2 % were positive by PCR. In addition, the number of confirmed cases of bovine leptospirosis based on clinical suspicion and MAT and/or PCR increased the diagnostic rate to 79.5 %. LigB-PCR can detect traces of leptospiral DNA in serum with negative or low antibody titers and could be used as a complementary tool to MAT.
期刊介绍:
Research in Veterinary Science is an International multi-disciplinary journal publishing original articles, reviews and short communications of a high scientific and ethical standard in all aspects of veterinary and biomedical research.
The primary aim of the journal is to inform veterinary and biomedical scientists of significant advances in veterinary and related research through prompt publication and dissemination. Secondly, the journal aims to provide a general multi-disciplinary forum for discussion and debate of news and issues concerning veterinary science. Thirdly, to promote the dissemination of knowledge to a broader range of professions, globally.
High quality papers on all species of animals are considered, particularly those considered to be of high scientific importance and originality, and with interdisciplinary interest. The journal encourages papers providing results that have clear implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and for the development of control measures or treatments, as well as those dealing with a comparative biomedical approach, which represents a substantial improvement to animal and human health.
Studies without a robust scientific hypothesis or that are preliminary, or of weak originality, as well as negative results, are not appropriate for the journal. Furthermore, observational approaches, case studies or field reports lacking an advancement in general knowledge do not fall within the scope of the journal.