J. Gårdling , C. Viseu , E. Hettinger , P. Jildenstål , A. Augustinsson
{"title":"The effects of virtual reality (VR) on clinical skills training in undergraduate radiography education: A systematic review","authors":"J. Gårdling , C. Viseu , E. Hettinger , P. Jildenstål , A. Augustinsson","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2025.102911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The primary objective was to map the impact on confidence and performance on radiographic examinations among undergraduate radiography students utilizing virtual reality (VR). The secondary objective was to identify potential pitfalls to avoid in future VR implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review was conducted, which included comprehensive search in nine databases. The software Covidence was used for screening. Nine studies were included after quality assurance using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). Data extraction consisted of participant characteristics, study design, relevant statistical results, study limitations, and conclusions. Key findings were summarized in a systematic synthesis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>VR compared to traditional skills training provides an advantage in students' assessed performance in both equipment and patient positioning, as well as self-reported confidence within equipment positioning, selection of exposure parameters, and radiation safety. For successful outcome, factors to consider were the size of the VR room, VR tutorials, the length of the VR-session, a realistic VR environment, feedback from the VR system, and the opportunity to interact with patients, both verbally and palpatory.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>VR is a feasible tool, providing students with a safe, engaging, and controlled environment. Students may apply their theoretical knowledge into real-life scenarios, which develop students' clinical skills, critical thinking, and decision-making abilities.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>Although VR has shown positive effects, VR alone does not guarantee increased performance and confidence in students. Research within this field is deficient, hence further research is needed to confirm the effect of VR, preferably case–control or randomized studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 3","pages":"Article 102911"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817425000525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The primary objective was to map the impact on confidence and performance on radiographic examinations among undergraduate radiography students utilizing virtual reality (VR). The secondary objective was to identify potential pitfalls to avoid in future VR implementation.
Methods
A systematic review was conducted, which included comprehensive search in nine databases. The software Covidence was used for screening. Nine studies were included after quality assurance using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). Data extraction consisted of participant characteristics, study design, relevant statistical results, study limitations, and conclusions. Key findings were summarized in a systematic synthesis.
Results
VR compared to traditional skills training provides an advantage in students' assessed performance in both equipment and patient positioning, as well as self-reported confidence within equipment positioning, selection of exposure parameters, and radiation safety. For successful outcome, factors to consider were the size of the VR room, VR tutorials, the length of the VR-session, a realistic VR environment, feedback from the VR system, and the opportunity to interact with patients, both verbally and palpatory.
Conclusion
VR is a feasible tool, providing students with a safe, engaging, and controlled environment. Students may apply their theoretical knowledge into real-life scenarios, which develop students' clinical skills, critical thinking, and decision-making abilities.
Implications for practice
Although VR has shown positive effects, VR alone does not guarantee increased performance and confidence in students. Research within this field is deficient, hence further research is needed to confirm the effect of VR, preferably case–control or randomized studies.
RadiographyRADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍:
Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.