A Membrane Modification Technique for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Youqi Fan MD , Dongxing Ma MD , Changqian Wang MD , Jun Luo MD , Zhiyu Ling MD , Shuyan Li MD , Xiaoping Peng MD , Zheng Zhang MD , Huimin Chu MD , Jianan Wang MD , investigators in the present study
{"title":"A Membrane Modification Technique for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion","authors":"Youqi Fan MD ,&nbsp;Dongxing Ma MD ,&nbsp;Changqian Wang MD ,&nbsp;Jun Luo MD ,&nbsp;Zhiyu Ling MD ,&nbsp;Shuyan Li MD ,&nbsp;Xiaoping Peng MD ,&nbsp;Zheng Zhang MD ,&nbsp;Huimin Chu MD ,&nbsp;Jianan Wang MD ,&nbsp;investigators in the present study","doi":"10.1016/j.jacasi.2024.12.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>We previously pioneered a negatively ionized polyethylene terephthalate membrane method (the SMART technique) with the LAMax (test) occluder to reduce platelet adhesion and promote endothelialization.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of the test occluder with the Watchman 2.5 device (control) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation to reduce stroke risk.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Overall, 236 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) (open-label) to the test or control device for left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). The effectiveness endpoints included 12-month successful left atrial appendage (LAA) sealing with residual flow ≤5 mm and clinical success (composite of ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and systemic embolism). Safety endpoints were also studied. A noninferiority margin of –7% was set between the devices.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The test device was noninferior to the control device for the effectiveness endpoints of successful LAA sealing (test 93.2% vs control 89.8%; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) and clinical success (test 93.2% vs control 89.8%; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). The 12-month safety endpoints were similar between the 2 devices. The device-related thrombus rates for the control device at the 3- and 12-month visits were 5.7% and 4.6%, respectively; no cases of device-related thrombus occurred with the test device.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study suggests that transcatheter LAAO using the SMART technique may effectively and safely prevent stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Although further studies with larger sample sizes are needed, this novel technique may prevent device-related thrombus formation and has high potential for application in interventional therapies. (LAMax Vs. Watchman LAAC Device for Subjects With Non-valvular AF to Reduce the Risk of Stroke; <span><span>NCT04429646</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>)</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73529,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Asia","volume":"5 3","pages":"Pages 374-387"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772374724005817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

We previously pioneered a negatively ionized polyethylene terephthalate membrane method (the SMART technique) with the LAMax (test) occluder to reduce platelet adhesion and promote endothelialization.

Objectives

This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of the test occluder with the Watchman 2.5 device (control) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation to reduce stroke risk.

Methods

Overall, 236 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) (open-label) to the test or control device for left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). The effectiveness endpoints included 12-month successful left atrial appendage (LAA) sealing with residual flow ≤5 mm and clinical success (composite of ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and systemic embolism). Safety endpoints were also studied. A noninferiority margin of –7% was set between the devices.

Results

The test device was noninferior to the control device for the effectiveness endpoints of successful LAA sealing (test 93.2% vs control 89.8%; P < 0.05) and clinical success (test 93.2% vs control 89.8%; P < 0.05). The 12-month safety endpoints were similar between the 2 devices. The device-related thrombus rates for the control device at the 3- and 12-month visits were 5.7% and 4.6%, respectively; no cases of device-related thrombus occurred with the test device.

Conclusions

This study suggests that transcatheter LAAO using the SMART technique may effectively and safely prevent stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Although further studies with larger sample sizes are needed, this novel technique may prevent device-related thrombus formation and has high potential for application in interventional therapies. (LAMax Vs. Watchman LAAC Device for Subjects With Non-valvular AF to Reduce the Risk of Stroke; NCT04429646)
左心耳闭塞的膜修饰技术
我们之前开创了一种带LAMax(测试)闭塞器的负离子聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯膜方法(SMART技术),以减少血小板粘附并促进内皮化。目的比较试验封堵器与Watchman 2.5装置(对照组)在非瓣膜性房颤患者中降低卒中风险的安全性和有效性。方法将236例患者随机(1:1)(开放标签)分配到左心耳闭塞(LAAO)试验装置或对照装置中。有效性终点包括12个月左心耳(LAA)封闭成功且残余血流≤5mm和临床成功(缺血性卒中、短暂性缺血性发作和全体性栓塞的组合)。安全终点也进行了研究。两种器械之间的非劣效性裕度为-7%。结果在LAA密封成功的有效性终点上,试验装置与对照装置的差异不显著(试验93.2% vs对照89.8%;P & lt;0.05)和临床成功率(试验93.2% vs对照组89.8%;P & lt;0.05)。两种设备的12个月安全终点相似。在3个月和12个月的随访中,对照装置的装置相关血栓率分别为5.7%和4.6%;试验装置未发生与装置相关的血栓。结论采用SMART技术的经导管LAAO可有效、安全地预防非瓣膜性房颤患者脑卒中。虽然需要更大样本量的进一步研究,但这种新技术可能会预防与器械相关的血栓形成,并且在介入治疗中具有很高的应用潜力。LAMax与Watchman LAAC装置用于非瓣膜性房颤降低卒中风险NCT04429646)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JACC. Asia
JACC. Asia Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信