Insights from antiaging-related X discussions: A six-year #Longevity hashtag analysis study

IF 3.6 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Joanna Bensz , Dariusz Sołdacki , Zilin Ma , Farhan Bin Matin , Maima Matin , Atanas G. Atanasov
{"title":"Insights from antiaging-related X discussions: A six-year #Longevity hashtag analysis study","authors":"Joanna Bensz ,&nbsp;Dariusz Sołdacki ,&nbsp;Zilin Ma ,&nbsp;Farhan Bin Matin ,&nbsp;Maima Matin ,&nbsp;Atanas G. Atanasov","doi":"10.1016/j.crbiot.2025.100280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As social media platforms continue to play an increasingly significant role in shaping public discourse and disseminating scientific information, understanding how longevity and aging-related topics are discussed online has become crucial for researchers and healthcare professionals. This study investigates the global discourse on longevity and aging through the analysis of the hashtag #Longevity on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) over a six-year period from August 1, 2018, to August 1, 2024. A total of 382 032 posts were shared by 109 935 users across 200 countries. The analysis focused on revealing key themes, geographical distribution, sentiment analysis, and the most frequently mentioned supplements and drugs related to longevity. The results show a high level of engagement with the hashtag, primarily driven by users from the United States, followed by the United Kingdom and Canada. Sentiment analysis revealed predominantly positive attitudes towards longevity-related topics, with a slight but statistically significant (p &lt; 0.0001) decline during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. The study identified nicotinamide mononucleotide, rapamycin, and green tea as the most frequently mentioned supplements or drugs in longevity discussions. Notably, there was a significant increase in discussions about niacin derivatives, particularly nicotinamide mononucleotide, during and after the pandemic period. This study highlights the importance of social media as a tool for gauging public interest and sentiment towards scientific topics like longevity, providing valuable insights for researchers, healthcare professionals, and policymakers to enhance science communication and public engagement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52676,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Biotechnology","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100280"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590262825000097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As social media platforms continue to play an increasingly significant role in shaping public discourse and disseminating scientific information, understanding how longevity and aging-related topics are discussed online has become crucial for researchers and healthcare professionals. This study investigates the global discourse on longevity and aging through the analysis of the hashtag #Longevity on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) over a six-year period from August 1, 2018, to August 1, 2024. A total of 382 032 posts were shared by 109 935 users across 200 countries. The analysis focused on revealing key themes, geographical distribution, sentiment analysis, and the most frequently mentioned supplements and drugs related to longevity. The results show a high level of engagement with the hashtag, primarily driven by users from the United States, followed by the United Kingdom and Canada. Sentiment analysis revealed predominantly positive attitudes towards longevity-related topics, with a slight but statistically significant (p < 0.0001) decline during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. The study identified nicotinamide mononucleotide, rapamycin, and green tea as the most frequently mentioned supplements or drugs in longevity discussions. Notably, there was a significant increase in discussions about niacin derivatives, particularly nicotinamide mononucleotide, during and after the pandemic period. This study highlights the importance of social media as a tool for gauging public interest and sentiment towards scientific topics like longevity, providing valuable insights for researchers, healthcare professionals, and policymakers to enhance science communication and public engagement.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Research in Biotechnology
Current Research in Biotechnology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
50
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Current Research in Biotechnology (CRBIOT) is a new primary research, gold open access journal from Elsevier. CRBIOT publishes original papers, reviews, and short communications (including viewpoints and perspectives) resulting from research in biotechnology and biotech-associated disciplines. Current Research in Biotechnology is a peer-reviewed gold open access (OA) journal and upon acceptance all articles are permanently and freely available. It is a companion to the highly regarded review journal Current Opinion in Biotechnology (2018 CiteScore 8.450) and is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals. All CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy-of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach-to ensure they are a widely read resource that is integral to scientists' workflow.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信