Reducing the climate impact of residual waste treatment: A German case study on carbon management strategies

IF 7.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Sarah Schmidt, David Laner
{"title":"Reducing the climate impact of residual waste treatment: A German case study on carbon management strategies","authors":"Sarah Schmidt,&nbsp;David Laner","doi":"10.1016/j.wasman.2025.02.048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Climate neutrality goals require adapting the management of fossil carbon in waste management. This study evaluates the effectiveness of two key carbon management strategies addressing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from residual waste treatment, namely: pre-sorting residual waste in a material recovery facility to remove recyclable, carbon-rich materials (S_MRF) versus post-treatment of municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) flue gas through carbon capture and storage (S_MSWI_CCS). Using residual waste management in Kassel, Germany, as a case study, GHG emissions are assessed for current and prospective scenarios, accounting for changes in waste inputs, material and energy systems, substitution choices, and uncertainties in treatment technology data. It is shown that MSWI in Kassel emits 857 kg of CO<sub>2</sub> per t of wet residual waste, with 31 % fossil CO<sub>2</sub>. Carbon management strategies can reduce direct fossil CO<sub>2</sub> emissions by 27 % (S_MRF) or 90 % (S_MSWI_CCS) and increase the net life cycle GHG savings of residual waste management by a factor of 1.6 (S_MRF) or 2.6 (S_MSWI_CCS), respectively. S_MSWI_CCS offers the highest potential to decrease the GHG footprint of residual waste management and is least sensitive to variations in waste composition, energy and material systems, and substitution choices. Discernibly higher net GHG savings of S_MRF compared to S_MSWI_CCS can only be observed if residual waste is rich in recyclables (low separate collection). Overall, this study highlights the utility of refined scenario, uncertainty and discernability analysis in accounting for local conditions and different settings as well as potential future changes to promote environmental decision support on waste management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23969,"journal":{"name":"Waste management","volume":"198 ","pages":"Pages 137-150"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X25001175","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate neutrality goals require adapting the management of fossil carbon in waste management. This study evaluates the effectiveness of two key carbon management strategies addressing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from residual waste treatment, namely: pre-sorting residual waste in a material recovery facility to remove recyclable, carbon-rich materials (S_MRF) versus post-treatment of municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) flue gas through carbon capture and storage (S_MSWI_CCS). Using residual waste management in Kassel, Germany, as a case study, GHG emissions are assessed for current and prospective scenarios, accounting for changes in waste inputs, material and energy systems, substitution choices, and uncertainties in treatment technology data. It is shown that MSWI in Kassel emits 857 kg of CO2 per t of wet residual waste, with 31 % fossil CO2. Carbon management strategies can reduce direct fossil CO2 emissions by 27 % (S_MRF) or 90 % (S_MSWI_CCS) and increase the net life cycle GHG savings of residual waste management by a factor of 1.6 (S_MRF) or 2.6 (S_MSWI_CCS), respectively. S_MSWI_CCS offers the highest potential to decrease the GHG footprint of residual waste management and is least sensitive to variations in waste composition, energy and material systems, and substitution choices. Discernibly higher net GHG savings of S_MRF compared to S_MSWI_CCS can only be observed if residual waste is rich in recyclables (low separate collection). Overall, this study highlights the utility of refined scenario, uncertainty and discernability analysis in accounting for local conditions and different settings as well as potential future changes to promote environmental decision support on waste management.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Waste management
Waste management 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
492
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Waste Management is devoted to the presentation and discussion of information on solid wastes,it covers the entire lifecycle of solid. wastes. Scope: Addresses solid wastes in both industrialized and economically developing countries Covers various types of solid wastes, including: Municipal (e.g., residential, institutional, commercial, light industrial) Agricultural Special (e.g., C and D, healthcare, household hazardous wastes, sewage sludge)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信