More persistent precipitation regimes induce soil degradation

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Olga Vindušková , Gaby Deckmyn , Simon Reynaert , Karen Vancampenhout , Steffen Schlüter , Jan Frouz , Hans De Boeck , Miguel Portillo-Estrada , Erik Verbruggen , Han Asard , Gerrit T.S. Beemster , Ivan Nijs
{"title":"More persistent precipitation regimes induce soil degradation","authors":"Olga Vindušková ,&nbsp;Gaby Deckmyn ,&nbsp;Simon Reynaert ,&nbsp;Karen Vancampenhout ,&nbsp;Steffen Schlüter ,&nbsp;Jan Frouz ,&nbsp;Hans De Boeck ,&nbsp;Miguel Portillo-Estrada ,&nbsp;Erik Verbruggen ,&nbsp;Han Asard ,&nbsp;Gerrit T.S. Beemster ,&nbsp;Ivan Nijs","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the mid-latitudes, precipitation regimes are becoming more persistent, with longer consistently dry and rainy periods. Such a rise in precipitation regime persistence (PRP) – defined as the length of consecutive dry or wet periods – could significantly affect soil properties and their role in soil–plant-water relationships. To investigate these effects, we conducted a 16-month outdoor grassland mesocosm experiment. We simulated four levels of PRP by varying the duration of alternating dry and rainy periods: 1, 6, 15, or 60 days. The regimes started with either a dry or a wet period, resulting in two levels of timing and eight different treatments altogether, all of which received the same total amount of water across the entire experiment.</div><div>Higher PRP (longer alternation periods) decreased soil aggregate stability, without a similar trend in total soil carbon. PRP also affected potential soil water repellency (SWR) in interaction with timing. Higher PRP decreased potential SWR when the timing of the dry periods coincided with summer heatwaves and plant productivity was overall hindered. However, when the dry periods coincided with less warm months and the overall plant productivity was maintained, PRP increased potential SWR. PRP enhanced actual soil water repellency measured in the field which reduced infiltration rates. Water retention was also affected, with lower field capacity and available water capacity in the more persistent treatments, and wilting point following a convex relationship across the PRP range. Furthermore, bulk density increased with PRP. Structural equation modeling revealed that these soil degradation patterns often but not always correspond with plant productivity, which in general declined with PRP. However, some soil properties proved to be more sensitive to PRP than plant productivity. Overall, more persistent precipitation regimes induced soil degradation especially by reducing aggregate stability, water retention, and infiltration, and this soil legacy may exacerbate the effects of future climate change on temperate grasslands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12511,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma","volume":"455 ","pages":"Article 117230"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706125000680","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the mid-latitudes, precipitation regimes are becoming more persistent, with longer consistently dry and rainy periods. Such a rise in precipitation regime persistence (PRP) – defined as the length of consecutive dry or wet periods – could significantly affect soil properties and their role in soil–plant-water relationships. To investigate these effects, we conducted a 16-month outdoor grassland mesocosm experiment. We simulated four levels of PRP by varying the duration of alternating dry and rainy periods: 1, 6, 15, or 60 days. The regimes started with either a dry or a wet period, resulting in two levels of timing and eight different treatments altogether, all of which received the same total amount of water across the entire experiment.
Higher PRP (longer alternation periods) decreased soil aggregate stability, without a similar trend in total soil carbon. PRP also affected potential soil water repellency (SWR) in interaction with timing. Higher PRP decreased potential SWR when the timing of the dry periods coincided with summer heatwaves and plant productivity was overall hindered. However, when the dry periods coincided with less warm months and the overall plant productivity was maintained, PRP increased potential SWR. PRP enhanced actual soil water repellency measured in the field which reduced infiltration rates. Water retention was also affected, with lower field capacity and available water capacity in the more persistent treatments, and wilting point following a convex relationship across the PRP range. Furthermore, bulk density increased with PRP. Structural equation modeling revealed that these soil degradation patterns often but not always correspond with plant productivity, which in general declined with PRP. However, some soil properties proved to be more sensitive to PRP than plant productivity. Overall, more persistent precipitation regimes induced soil degradation especially by reducing aggregate stability, water retention, and infiltration, and this soil legacy may exacerbate the effects of future climate change on temperate grasslands.

Abstract Image

更持久的降水机制导致土壤退化
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoderma
Geoderma 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.60%
发文量
597
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Geoderma - the global journal of soil science - welcomes authors, readers and soil research from all parts of the world, encourages worldwide soil studies, and embraces all aspects of soil science and its associated pedagogy. The journal particularly welcomes interdisciplinary work focusing on dynamic soil processes and functions across space and time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信