Assessing rice residue and nitrogen management strategies on productivity and nitrogen use efficiency of wheat in rice-wheat cropping system in Indo-Gangetic Plains

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Vicky Singh , Rajeev Kumar Gupta , Seema Sepat , Gobinder Singh , Chinka Batra
{"title":"Assessing rice residue and nitrogen management strategies on productivity and nitrogen use efficiency of wheat in rice-wheat cropping system in Indo-Gangetic Plains","authors":"Vicky Singh ,&nbsp;Rajeev Kumar Gupta ,&nbsp;Seema Sepat ,&nbsp;Gobinder Singh ,&nbsp;Chinka Batra","doi":"10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Rice-wheat cropping system produces ample scattered rice residue in the field after mechanical harvesting which holds no economic value for the farmers in the Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) of South Asia. Several options are available for managing rice residue, enabling wheat seeding in the succeeding season to avoid its burning. However, limited information is available on the efficient nitrogen management practices under different rice residue management options to achieve higher wheat productivity and N use efficiency (NUE).</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This two-year study (2020–2022) aimed to evaluate the effect of time and method of fertilizer N application under different rice residue management options on canopy temperature, wheat yield and NUE on two texturally different soils.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Field experiment was conducted in a split-plot design on two texturally different soils (sandy loam and clay loam). Treatments in the main plots included four different tillage and residue management (TRM) options; zero tillage with rice residue as mulch using Happy Seeder (ZTRM), minimum tillage with partial incorporation of residue using super seeder (MTRI), residue incorporation using mould board plough (MBRI), and conventional tillage after complete removal of residue (CTR0), and six fertilizer N management options (time and method of applications) including no N control in subplots.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ZTRM significantly reduced canopy temperature (CT) at the grain development stage compared to residue removal (CTR0) on both soil types. ZTRM resulted in mean yield increase of 2.2 % (2 yrs mean) over CTR0 on both soils. Among TRM options, CTR0 recorded the lowest NUE indices. Across the soils, ZTRM showed significantly higher values of agronomic efficiency (14.1 kg grain kg<sup>−1</sup> N), recovery efficiency (43.3 %) and physiological efficiency (27.4 kg grain kg<sup>−1</sup> N uptake) of applied N compared to the other TRM options on sandy loam with similar trend on clay loam. Application of 132 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> (N4) to wheat (24 kg at sowing, 96 kg top dressed at 1st and 2nd irrigation followed by three foliar sprays of 4 % urea) resulted in 76.5 % and 49.6 % increase in grain yield over no-N control in sandy loam and clay loam, respectively. The N4 recorded significantly higher N uptake and NUE in wheat compared to the other modes of fertilizer N application, irrespective of residue management option.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Zero tillage with rice residue as mulch using Happy Seeder and soil application of 120 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> in three splits along with 12 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> as three foliar sprays of 4 % urea solution are viable option to achieve higher wheat productivity and NUE in wheat to avoid rice residue burning in North-West IGP of India.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>This study revealed a paradigm approach for attaining higher productivity and N-use efficiency of wheat while preventing environmental consequences associated with residue burning and climate change in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of South Asia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12143,"journal":{"name":"Field Crops Research","volume":"325 ","pages":"Article 109826"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Crops Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429025000917","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Rice-wheat cropping system produces ample scattered rice residue in the field after mechanical harvesting which holds no economic value for the farmers in the Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) of South Asia. Several options are available for managing rice residue, enabling wheat seeding in the succeeding season to avoid its burning. However, limited information is available on the efficient nitrogen management practices under different rice residue management options to achieve higher wheat productivity and N use efficiency (NUE).

Objective

This two-year study (2020–2022) aimed to evaluate the effect of time and method of fertilizer N application under different rice residue management options on canopy temperature, wheat yield and NUE on two texturally different soils.

Methods

Field experiment was conducted in a split-plot design on two texturally different soils (sandy loam and clay loam). Treatments in the main plots included four different tillage and residue management (TRM) options; zero tillage with rice residue as mulch using Happy Seeder (ZTRM), minimum tillage with partial incorporation of residue using super seeder (MTRI), residue incorporation using mould board plough (MBRI), and conventional tillage after complete removal of residue (CTR0), and six fertilizer N management options (time and method of applications) including no N control in subplots.

Results

ZTRM significantly reduced canopy temperature (CT) at the grain development stage compared to residue removal (CTR0) on both soil types. ZTRM resulted in mean yield increase of 2.2 % (2 yrs mean) over CTR0 on both soils. Among TRM options, CTR0 recorded the lowest NUE indices. Across the soils, ZTRM showed significantly higher values of agronomic efficiency (14.1 kg grain kg−1 N), recovery efficiency (43.3 %) and physiological efficiency (27.4 kg grain kg−1 N uptake) of applied N compared to the other TRM options on sandy loam with similar trend on clay loam. Application of 132 kg N ha−1 (N4) to wheat (24 kg at sowing, 96 kg top dressed at 1st and 2nd irrigation followed by three foliar sprays of 4 % urea) resulted in 76.5 % and 49.6 % increase in grain yield over no-N control in sandy loam and clay loam, respectively. The N4 recorded significantly higher N uptake and NUE in wheat compared to the other modes of fertilizer N application, irrespective of residue management option.

Conclusions

Zero tillage with rice residue as mulch using Happy Seeder and soil application of 120 kg N ha−1 in three splits along with 12 kg N ha−1 as three foliar sprays of 4 % urea solution are viable option to achieve higher wheat productivity and NUE in wheat to avoid rice residue burning in North-West IGP of India.

Implications

This study revealed a paradigm approach for attaining higher productivity and N-use efficiency of wheat while preventing environmental consequences associated with residue burning and climate change in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of South Asia.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Field Crops Research
Field Crops Research 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
307
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Field Crops Research is an international journal publishing scientific articles on: √ experimental and modelling research at field, farm and landscape levels on temperate and tropical crops and cropping systems, with a focus on crop ecology and physiology, agronomy, and plant genetics and breeding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信