The impact of emotional expressions on the popularity of discussion threads: evidence from Reddit

IF 5.9 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Mahdi Abouei, Nima Kordzadeh, Maryam Ghasemaghaei, Bilal Khan
{"title":"The impact of emotional expressions on the popularity of discussion threads: evidence from Reddit","authors":"Mahdi Abouei, Nima Kordzadeh, Maryam Ghasemaghaei, Bilal Khan","doi":"10.1108/intr-12-2023-1187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Users contribute to online communities by posting and responding to discussion threads. Nonetheless, only a small fraction of threads gain popularity and shape community discourse. Prior studies have identified several factors driving thread popularity; however, despite their prevalence, the role of emotional expressions within discussion threads remains understudied. This study addresses this gap by investigating the impact of thread starters’ valence and embedded discrete emotions of anger, anxiety and sadness on thread popularity, drawing on the negativity bias and the emotion-as-social-information theories.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Using two samples from Reddit, this study employs negative binomial regression analysis to examine the hypothesized relationships.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results demonstrate that negativity in thread starters significantly influences thread popularity; however, the expression of discrete emotions impacts popularity variously. In some contexts, such as COVID-19 vaccination subreddits, embedded anger in thread starters decreases thread popularity, whereas anxiety and sad expressions enhance it. In other contexts, such as professional discussions (e.g. r/Medicine subreddit), anger and anxiety expressions increase thread popularity, while sad expressions have no significant influence.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The study is limited by its focus on specific emotions and contexts. Future research could examine a broader range of emotions, post-content modalities and the impact of cultural and linguistic differences.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study contributes to theory by offering a new definition of thread popularity and enhancing our understanding of the impact of emotions in online discussions. It also provides practical implications for online community members and moderators seeking to promote discussion posts that help achieve community goals.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":54925,"journal":{"name":"Internet Research","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-12-2023-1187","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Users contribute to online communities by posting and responding to discussion threads. Nonetheless, only a small fraction of threads gain popularity and shape community discourse. Prior studies have identified several factors driving thread popularity; however, despite their prevalence, the role of emotional expressions within discussion threads remains understudied. This study addresses this gap by investigating the impact of thread starters’ valence and embedded discrete emotions of anger, anxiety and sadness on thread popularity, drawing on the negativity bias and the emotion-as-social-information theories.

Design/methodology/approach

Using two samples from Reddit, this study employs negative binomial regression analysis to examine the hypothesized relationships.

Findings

The results demonstrate that negativity in thread starters significantly influences thread popularity; however, the expression of discrete emotions impacts popularity variously. In some contexts, such as COVID-19 vaccination subreddits, embedded anger in thread starters decreases thread popularity, whereas anxiety and sad expressions enhance it. In other contexts, such as professional discussions (e.g. r/Medicine subreddit), anger and anxiety expressions increase thread popularity, while sad expressions have no significant influence.

Research limitations/implications

The study is limited by its focus on specific emotions and contexts. Future research could examine a broader range of emotions, post-content modalities and the impact of cultural and linguistic differences.

Originality/value

This study contributes to theory by offering a new definition of thread popularity and enhancing our understanding of the impact of emotions in online discussions. It also provides practical implications for online community members and moderators seeking to promote discussion posts that help achieve community goals.

情绪表达对讨论主题受欢迎程度的影响:来自Reddit的证据
用户通过发布和回应讨论线程来为在线社区做出贡献。尽管如此,只有一小部分主题获得了流行并形成了社区话语。先前的研究已经确定了几个驱动线程流行的因素;然而,尽管它们很流行,但情感表达在讨论线程中的作用仍未得到充分研究。本研究利用消极偏见理论和情绪作为社会信息理论,通过调查线程启动者的效价和嵌入的愤怒、焦虑和悲伤的离散情绪对线程受欢迎程度的影响,解决了这一空白。设计/方法/方法本研究使用来自Reddit的两个样本,采用负二项回归分析来检验假设的关系。结果表明:消极的线程启动者显著影响线程的受欢迎程度;然而,离散情绪的表达对受欢迎程度的影响是不同的。在某些情况下,比如COVID-19疫苗接种子reddit,在帖子发起者中嵌入愤怒会降低帖子的受欢迎程度,而焦虑和悲伤的表达会提高帖子的受欢迎程度。在其他情况下,如专业讨论(如r/Medicine subreddit),愤怒和焦虑的表情增加了帖子的受欢迎程度,而悲伤的表情没有显著影响。研究的局限性/启示这项研究的局限性在于它关注的是特定的情绪和环境。未来的研究可以考察更广泛的情绪、后内容模式以及文化和语言差异的影响。原创性/价值本研究为理论提供了一个新的定义,并加强了我们对在线讨论中情绪影响的理解。它还为寻求促进有助于实现社区目标的讨论帖子的在线社区成员和版主提供了实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internet Research
Internet Research 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.20%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This wide-ranging interdisciplinary journal looks at the social, ethical, economic and political implications of the internet. Recent issues have focused on online and mobile gaming, the sharing economy, and the dark side of social media.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信