Uncovering the antecedents to the effective use of business intelligence: lessons from a qualitative systematic review approach

IF 7.4 3区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Alexandra Adriani Widjaja, Amir Hossein Ghapanchi, Scott Bingley
{"title":"Uncovering the antecedents to the effective use of business intelligence: lessons from a qualitative systematic review approach","authors":"Alexandra Adriani Widjaja, Amir Hossein Ghapanchi, Scott Bingley","doi":"10.1108/jeim-08-2024-0440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study focuses on case studies to identify the antecedents to the effective use of business intelligence (BI). For decades, research has shown that post-adoption behaviour has a critical role in the success of technology adoption. Efforts have been drawn beyond intention and adoption point to the effective use of technology. In the case of BI adoption, its nature of discretional use adds complexity to the equation. Despite the statistical evidence provided, research has indicated the need for other approaches to shed light on the antecedents of BI’s effective use.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This study employs a systematic review approach to synthesise 20 years of related works from three major research databases. It focuses on qualitative and mixed-method research to identify new avenues in the related topic.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings provide the taxonomy of the antecedents. It identifies 40 antecedents grouped into 8 categories: technology, operational support, resources, governance, strategic, individual behaviour, environment and culture. It also highlights several organisation-specific and individual-specific antecedents, such as analytic leadership, business vision, collaborative working culture, organisational learning culture and user trust.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The study provides insight from interpretative case studies. It leverages the relevance of BI’s research to its practices. It offers new avenues in the BI post-adoption studies at the organisational and the individual level of analysis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47889,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Enterprise Information Management","volume":"193 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Enterprise Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-08-2024-0440","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study focuses on case studies to identify the antecedents to the effective use of business intelligence (BI). For decades, research has shown that post-adoption behaviour has a critical role in the success of technology adoption. Efforts have been drawn beyond intention and adoption point to the effective use of technology. In the case of BI adoption, its nature of discretional use adds complexity to the equation. Despite the statistical evidence provided, research has indicated the need for other approaches to shed light on the antecedents of BI’s effective use.

Design/methodology/approach

This study employs a systematic review approach to synthesise 20 years of related works from three major research databases. It focuses on qualitative and mixed-method research to identify new avenues in the related topic.

Findings

The findings provide the taxonomy of the antecedents. It identifies 40 antecedents grouped into 8 categories: technology, operational support, resources, governance, strategic, individual behaviour, environment and culture. It also highlights several organisation-specific and individual-specific antecedents, such as analytic leadership, business vision, collaborative working culture, organisational learning culture and user trust.

Originality/value

The study provides insight from interpretative case studies. It leverages the relevance of BI’s research to its practices. It offers new avenues in the BI post-adoption studies at the organisational and the individual level of analysis.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of Enterprise Information Management (JEIM) is a significant contributor to the normative literature, offering both conceptual and practical insights supported by innovative discoveries that enrich the existing body of knowledge. Within its pages, JEIM presents research findings sourced from globally renowned experts. These contributions encompass scholarly examinations of cutting-edge theories and practices originating from leading research institutions. Additionally, the journal features inputs from senior business executives and consultants, who share their insights gleaned from specific enterprise case studies. Through these reports, readers benefit from a comparative analysis of different environmental contexts, facilitating valuable learning experiences. JEIM's distinctive blend of theoretical analysis and practical application fosters comprehensive discussions on commercial discoveries. This approach enhances the audience's comprehension of contemporary, applied, and rigorous information management practices, which extend across entire enterprises and their intricate supply chains.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信