Clara Di Germanio, Erika G Marques de Menezes, Robert Clevenger, Ian Rines, Valerie L Durkalski-Mauldin, Eric Leifer, Sharon Yeatts, Xutao Deng, Brendan G Balasko, John F McDyer, Leilani Montalvo, Daniel Chafets, Nadine N Talia, Alexandra Weissman, Sumith R Panicker, Yogen Kanthi, Mars Stone, Frederick K Korley, Clifton W Callaway, Philip J Norris
{"title":"Viral and immune factors associated with COVID-19 outcome in the C3PO trial of convalescent plasma","authors":"Clara Di Germanio, Erika G Marques de Menezes, Robert Clevenger, Ian Rines, Valerie L Durkalski-Mauldin, Eric Leifer, Sharon Yeatts, Xutao Deng, Brendan G Balasko, John F McDyer, Leilani Montalvo, Daniel Chafets, Nadine N Talia, Alexandra Weissman, Sumith R Panicker, Yogen Kanthi, Mars Stone, Frederick K Korley, Clifton W Callaway, Philip J Norris","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiaf109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examined innate and antibody responses in C3PO clinical trial participants of COVID-19 convalescent plasma to identify predictors of disease progression. We found SARS-CoV-2 viremia in 64% of participants at enrollment, and we could also quantify viremia in approximately half of those samples using an RT-PCR assay. Viremia was associated with increased risk of disease progression (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.7–5.0). Participants with viremia at baseline had lower SARS-CoV-2 binding antibody levels and higher pro-inflammatory cytokine levels, including IP-10 (CXCL10), TNF-α, calprotectin, and CRP. Disease progression correlated with extracellular vesicle levels from multiple cell types in the convalescent but not acute phase of the disease. Male sex predicted worse disease outcome and was associated with higher baseline levels of several pro-inflammatory cytokines. Viremia’s strong predictive value for disease progression argues for further study of its use to predict which patients with COVID-19 might require more intensive therapy or monitoring.","PeriodicalId":501010,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaf109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We examined innate and antibody responses in C3PO clinical trial participants of COVID-19 convalescent plasma to identify predictors of disease progression. We found SARS-CoV-2 viremia in 64% of participants at enrollment, and we could also quantify viremia in approximately half of those samples using an RT-PCR assay. Viremia was associated with increased risk of disease progression (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.7–5.0). Participants with viremia at baseline had lower SARS-CoV-2 binding antibody levels and higher pro-inflammatory cytokine levels, including IP-10 (CXCL10), TNF-α, calprotectin, and CRP. Disease progression correlated with extracellular vesicle levels from multiple cell types in the convalescent but not acute phase of the disease. Male sex predicted worse disease outcome and was associated with higher baseline levels of several pro-inflammatory cytokines. Viremia’s strong predictive value for disease progression argues for further study of its use to predict which patients with COVID-19 might require more intensive therapy or monitoring.