Capture of Group A Streptococcus by open‐microfluidic CandyCollect device in pediatric patients

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Wan‐chen Tu, Ingrid H. Robertson, Andrea Blom, Elena Alfaro, Victoria A. M. Shinkawa, Daniel B. Hatchett, Juan C. Sanchez, Anika M. McManamen, Xiaojing Su, Erwin Berthier, Sanitta Thongpang, Ellen R. Wald, Gregory P. DeMuri, Ashleigh B. Theberge
{"title":"Capture of Group A Streptococcus by open‐microfluidic CandyCollect device in pediatric patients","authors":"Wan‐chen Tu, Ingrid H. Robertson, Andrea Blom, Elena Alfaro, Victoria A. M. Shinkawa, Daniel B. Hatchett, Juan C. Sanchez, Anika M. McManamen, Xiaojing Su, Erwin Berthier, Sanitta Thongpang, Ellen R. Wald, Gregory P. DeMuri, Ashleigh B. Theberge","doi":"10.1002/btm2.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"State the PurposeObtaining high‐quality samples to diagnose streptococcal pharyngitis in pediatric patients is challenging due to discomfort associated with traditional pharyngeal swabs. This may cause reluctance to go to the clinic, inaccurate diagnosis, or inappropriate treatment for children with sore throats. Here, we determined the efficacy of CandyCollect, a lollipop‐inspired open‐microfluidic pathogen collection device, to capture Group A <jats:italic>Streptococcus</jats:italic> (GAS) and compare user preference for CandyCollect, conventional pharyngeal swabs, or mouth swabs in children with pharyngitis and their caregivers.ResultsAll child participants (30/30) were positive for GAS by qPCR on both the mouth swab and CandyCollect. Caregivers ranked CandyCollect as a good sampling method overall (27/30), and all caregivers (30/30) would recommend CandyCollect for children 5 years and older. Twenty‐three of 30 children “really like” the taste and 24/30 would prefer to use CandyCollect if a future test were needed. All caregivers (30/30) and most children (28/30) would be willing to use CandyCollect at home.ConclusionAll participants tested positive for GAS on all three collection methods (pharyngeal swab, mouth swab, and CandyCollect). While both caregivers and children like CandyCollect, some caregivers would prefer a shorter collection time. Future work includes additional studies with larger cohorts presenting with pharyngitis of unknown etiology and shortening collection time while maintaining the attractive form of the device.","PeriodicalId":9263,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering & Translational Medicine","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering & Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.70001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

State the PurposeObtaining high‐quality samples to diagnose streptococcal pharyngitis in pediatric patients is challenging due to discomfort associated with traditional pharyngeal swabs. This may cause reluctance to go to the clinic, inaccurate diagnosis, or inappropriate treatment for children with sore throats. Here, we determined the efficacy of CandyCollect, a lollipop‐inspired open‐microfluidic pathogen collection device, to capture Group A Streptococcus (GAS) and compare user preference for CandyCollect, conventional pharyngeal swabs, or mouth swabs in children with pharyngitis and their caregivers.ResultsAll child participants (30/30) were positive for GAS by qPCR on both the mouth swab and CandyCollect. Caregivers ranked CandyCollect as a good sampling method overall (27/30), and all caregivers (30/30) would recommend CandyCollect for children 5 years and older. Twenty‐three of 30 children “really like” the taste and 24/30 would prefer to use CandyCollect if a future test were needed. All caregivers (30/30) and most children (28/30) would be willing to use CandyCollect at home.ConclusionAll participants tested positive for GAS on all three collection methods (pharyngeal swab, mouth swab, and CandyCollect). While both caregivers and children like CandyCollect, some caregivers would prefer a shorter collection time. Future work includes additional studies with larger cohorts presenting with pharyngitis of unknown etiology and shortening collection time while maintaining the attractive form of the device.
开放微流控CandyCollect装置在儿科患者中捕获A群链球菌
由于传统咽拭子拭子带来的不适,获得高质量的样本来诊断儿科患者的链球菌性咽炎是具有挑战性的。这可能会导致不愿去诊所,不准确的诊断,或不适当的治疗儿童喉咙痛。在这里,我们确定了CandyCollect(一种棒棒糖启发的开放式微流控病原体收集装置)捕获a群链球菌(GAS)的功效,并比较了用户对患有咽炎的儿童及其护理人员使用CandyCollect、传统咽拭子或口腔拭子的偏好。结果所有儿童(30/30)的口腔拭子和CandyCollect的qPCR检测均为GAS阳性。护理人员将CandyCollect评为总体上良好的抽样方法(27/30),所有护理人员(30/30)都会向5岁及以上的儿童推荐CandyCollect。30个孩子中有23个“非常喜欢”这种味道,24/30的孩子更愿意在未来需要测试时使用CandyCollect。所有护理人员(30/30)和大多数儿童(28/30)都愿意在家中使用CandyCollect。结论所有参与者在三种收集方法(咽拭子、口腔拭子和CandyCollect)中均检测到GAS阳性。虽然照顾者和孩子都喜欢CandyCollect,但一些照顾者更喜欢更短的收集时间。未来的工作包括对病因不明的咽炎患者进行更多的研究,并在保持器械美观的同时缩短收集时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
150
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bioengineering & Translational Medicine, an official, peer-reviewed online open-access journal of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) and the Society for Biological Engineering (SBE), focuses on how chemical and biological engineering approaches drive innovative technologies and solutions that impact clinical practice and commercial healthcare products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信