A Prospective Assessment of the Etiology of Murine Dystocia.

Christopher Cheleuitte-Nieves, Amanda Ritter, Michael B Palillo, Ileana C Miranda, Sebastian E Carrasco, Sébastien Monette, Mohamed I Atmane, Neil S Lipman
{"title":"A Prospective Assessment of the Etiology of Murine Dystocia.","authors":"Christopher Cheleuitte-Nieves, Amanda Ritter, Michael B Palillo, Ileana C Miranda, Sebastian E Carrasco, Sébastien Monette, Mohamed I Atmane, Neil S Lipman","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-24-090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dystocia, a common murine reproductive condition, is classified as either obstructive, a result of fetal factors such as an oversized fetus, or functional, a result of dam factors such as advanced age. Treatment is based on the dam's clinical condition and the underlying etiology, but usually requires euthanasia. A prospective study was conducted to characterize the etiology of murine dystocia to determine if treatment is warranted. The signalment and experimental, clinical, and breeding histories were obtained, and a targeted serum chemistry panel, radiographs, and a gross necropsy were conducted on mice presenting with clinical signs consistent with dystocia. Obstructive dystocia was diagnosed if the pelvic canal width was less than the diameter of the fetal head closest to the cervix or a fetus was lodged in the pelvic canal. Functional dystocia was diagnosed based on clinicopathologic abnormalities. A total of 54 mice were evaluated over 7 mo with 45/54 (83%) confirmed to have dystocia with the remaining 9 (17%) having other reproductive abnormalities. Of the confirmed cases, 27/45 (60%) were C57BL/6 or on a C57BL/6 background, and the average age at presentation was 181 ± 85 d. The number of mice categorized as having an obstructive (n = 16) compared with a functional (n = 11) dystocia was not significantly different than those in which the definitive category could not be ascertained (n = 18). Neither clinical signs nor clinical pathology were significantly different between mice categorized as having an obstructive compared with a functional dystocia. Hunched posture, lethargy, and vaginal discharge were the most common presentation. Azotemia (BUN: 66.6 ± 10.2 mg/dL, mean ± SE), hypoglycemia (96.11 ± 8.5 mg/dL), and hyperglobulinemia (3.13 ± 0.14 mg/dL) were common. Differentiating obstructive from functional dystocia could not be determined cageside with strong confidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":94111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS","volume":"64 1","pages":"172-178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808381/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-24-090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dystocia, a common murine reproductive condition, is classified as either obstructive, a result of fetal factors such as an oversized fetus, or functional, a result of dam factors such as advanced age. Treatment is based on the dam's clinical condition and the underlying etiology, but usually requires euthanasia. A prospective study was conducted to characterize the etiology of murine dystocia to determine if treatment is warranted. The signalment and experimental, clinical, and breeding histories were obtained, and a targeted serum chemistry panel, radiographs, and a gross necropsy were conducted on mice presenting with clinical signs consistent with dystocia. Obstructive dystocia was diagnosed if the pelvic canal width was less than the diameter of the fetal head closest to the cervix or a fetus was lodged in the pelvic canal. Functional dystocia was diagnosed based on clinicopathologic abnormalities. A total of 54 mice were evaluated over 7 mo with 45/54 (83%) confirmed to have dystocia with the remaining 9 (17%) having other reproductive abnormalities. Of the confirmed cases, 27/45 (60%) were C57BL/6 or on a C57BL/6 background, and the average age at presentation was 181 ± 85 d. The number of mice categorized as having an obstructive (n = 16) compared with a functional (n = 11) dystocia was not significantly different than those in which the definitive category could not be ascertained (n = 18). Neither clinical signs nor clinical pathology were significantly different between mice categorized as having an obstructive compared with a functional dystocia. Hunched posture, lethargy, and vaginal discharge were the most common presentation. Azotemia (BUN: 66.6 ± 10.2 mg/dL, mean ± SE), hypoglycemia (96.11 ± 8.5 mg/dL), and hyperglobulinemia (3.13 ± 0.14 mg/dL) were common. Differentiating obstructive from functional dystocia could not be determined cageside with strong confidence.

小鼠难产病因的前瞻性评估。
难产是一种常见的小鼠生殖状况,可分为梗阻性(胎儿因素,如过大的胎儿)和功能性(大坝因素,如高龄)。治疗是基于大坝的临床状况和潜在的病因,但通常需要安乐死。进行了一项前瞻性研究,以确定小鼠难产的病因,以确定是否有必要进行治疗。获得信号、实验、临床和繁殖史,并对出现与难产相一致的临床症状的小鼠进行靶向血清化学检查、x线片和大体尸检。如果盆腔管宽度小于胎儿头最靠近子宫颈的直径或胎儿卡在盆腔管中,则诊断为梗阻性难产。根据临床病理异常诊断为功能性难产。对54只小鼠进行了7个月的评估,其中45/54(83%)确认难产,其余9只(17%)有其他生殖异常。在确诊病例中,27/45(60%)为C57BL/6或C57BL/6背景,平均发病年龄为181±85天。被归类为梗阻性难产(n = 16)与功能性难产(n = 11)的小鼠数量与无法确定确切类型的小鼠数量(n = 18)没有显著差异。与功能性难产相比,梗阻性难产小鼠的临床体征和临床病理均无显著差异。驼背、嗜睡和阴道分泌物是最常见的表现。氮血症(BUN: 66.6±10.2 mg/dL,平均值±SE)、低血糖(96.11±8.5 mg/dL)、高球蛋白血症(3.13±0.14 mg/dL)较为常见。鉴别梗阻性难产与功能性难产并没有很强的把握。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信