Inhomogeneity of the lacrimal glands is the most important ultrasound finding in primary Sjögren's syndrome: a comprehensive study with 2D-Shear Wave Elastography.

Medical ultrasonography Pub Date : 2025-06-16 Epub Date: 2025-01-20 DOI:10.11152/mu-4471
Maria Badarinza, Oana Serban, Michael Andrei Pelea, Roxana Rosca, Lavinia Manuela Lenghel, Delia Doris Donci, Daniela Fodor
{"title":"Inhomogeneity of the lacrimal glands is the most important ultrasound finding in primary Sjögren's syndrome: a comprehensive study with 2D-Shear Wave Elastography.","authors":"Maria Badarinza, Oana Serban, Michael Andrei Pelea, Roxana Rosca, Lavinia Manuela Lenghel, Delia Doris Donci, Daniela Fodor","doi":"10.11152/mu-4471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance,  interobserver reliability, and practical utility of two lacrimal gland ultrasound (LGUS) scoring systems - LGUS score I, a complex multi-parameter score, and LGUS score II, a simplified single-parameter score - for diagnosing primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS). The additional role of two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) in assessing lacrimal gland stiffness was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This observational, cross-sectional study included 35 pSS patients and 35 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. LGUS score I incorporated four grey-scale ultrasound parameters, while LGUS score II relied solely on glandular homogeneity. Both scoring systems were evaluated for diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement. SWE measurements of lacrimal gland elasticity were also recorded and compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LGUS score II achieved diagnostic performance comparable to LGUS score I, with areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.831 and 0.829, respectively (p=0.961). Sensitivity was higher for LGUS score II (94.29%) than for LGUS score I (85.70%), with both scores demonstrating identical specificity (68.57%). Interobserver agreement was good for LGUS score II (κ=0.707) and moderate for LGUS score I (κ=0.553). SWE measurements showed no significant differences in mean elasticity values between the pSS and control groups (8.78±2.03 kPa vs. 9.27±2.07 kPa, p=0.158).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LGUS score II (glandular homogeneity) offers a reliable, time-efficient diagnostic approach for pSS, providing similar accuracy to the more complex LGUS score I with enhanced interobserver reliability, while the potential of 2D-SWE remains limited by methodological inconsistencies and requires further standardization.</p>","PeriodicalId":94138,"journal":{"name":"Medical ultrasonography","volume":" ","pages":"149-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical ultrasonography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11152/mu-4471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance,  interobserver reliability, and practical utility of two lacrimal gland ultrasound (LGUS) scoring systems - LGUS score I, a complex multi-parameter score, and LGUS score II, a simplified single-parameter score - for diagnosing primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS). The additional role of two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) in assessing lacrimal gland stiffness was also evaluated.

Material and methods: This observational, cross-sectional study included 35 pSS patients and 35 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. LGUS score I incorporated four grey-scale ultrasound parameters, while LGUS score II relied solely on glandular homogeneity. Both scoring systems were evaluated for diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement. SWE measurements of lacrimal gland elasticity were also recorded and compared between groups.

Results: LGUS score II achieved diagnostic performance comparable to LGUS score I, with areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.831 and 0.829, respectively (p=0.961). Sensitivity was higher for LGUS score II (94.29%) than for LGUS score I (85.70%), with both scores demonstrating identical specificity (68.57%). Interobserver agreement was good for LGUS score II (κ=0.707) and moderate for LGUS score I (κ=0.553). SWE measurements showed no significant differences in mean elasticity values between the pSS and control groups (8.78±2.03 kPa vs. 9.27±2.07 kPa, p=0.158).

Conclusion: LGUS score II (glandular homogeneity) offers a reliable, time-efficient diagnostic approach for pSS, providing similar accuracy to the more complex LGUS score I with enhanced interobserver reliability, while the potential of 2D-SWE remains limited by methodological inconsistencies and requires further standardization.

泪腺的不均匀性是原发性Sjögren综合征中最重要的超声发现:2d剪切波弹性成像的综合研究。
目的:本研究旨在比较两种泪腺超声(LGUS)评分系统的诊断性能、观察者间可靠性和实用价值,LGUS评分I是一种复杂的多参数评分,LGUS评分II是一种简化的单参数评分,用于诊断原发性Sjögren综合征(pSS)。二维剪切波弹性成像(2D-SWE)在评估泪腺硬度中的附加作用也被评估。材料和方法:这项观察性横断面研究包括35名pSS患者和35名年龄和性别匹配的健康对照。LGUS评分I纳入了4个灰度超声参数,而LGUS评分II仅依赖于腺体均匀性。评估两种评分系统的诊断准确性和观察者间的一致性。记录两组间泪腺弹性的SWE测量值并进行比较。结果:LGUS评分II与LGUS评分I的诊断效果相当,曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.831和0.829 (p=0.961)。LGUS II评分的敏感性(94.29%)高于LGUS I评分的敏感性(85.70%),两者的特异性相同(68.57%)。LGUS评分II的观察者间一致性良好(κ=0.707), LGUS评分I的观察者间一致性中等(κ=0.553)。SWE测量结果显示,pSS组和对照组的平均弹性值无显著差异(8.78±2.03 kPa vs. 9.27±2.07 kPa, p=0.158)。结论:LGUS评分II(腺体均匀性)为pSS提供了一种可靠、高效的诊断方法,与更复杂的LGUS评分I具有相似的准确性,并增强了观察者间的可靠性,而2D-SWE的潜力仍然受到方法不一致的限制,需要进一步标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信