Bodies of evidence: The human remains from Flinders Petrie's excavations in British Mandate Palestine.

Open research Europe Pub Date : 2025-01-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12688/openreseurope.18758.1
Rachael Thyrza Sparks, Nina Maaranen
{"title":"Bodies of evidence: The human remains from Flinders Petrie's excavations in British Mandate Palestine.","authors":"Rachael Thyrza Sparks, Nina Maaranen","doi":"10.12688/openreseurope.18758.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the 1920s and 1930s Flinders Petrie excavated several sites in British Mandate Palestine (Tell Jemmeh, Tell Fara and Tell el-'Ajjul), encountering numerous burials dating from the Chalcolithic period down to the Ottoman period. The osteological finds were thought to have been discarded, until the authors identified a curated selection of skeletal human remains from these tombs at the Duckworth Laboratory in Cambridge in 2017/2018.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Rachael Sparks conducted archival research to explore how the human remains from Petrie's excavations in the Southern Levant were recovered, recorded, curated and studied. This drew on original excavation records, contemporary publications, official and private correspondence, unpublished research notes, and the evidence of the human skeletal remains themselves.Following on this archival investigation, Nina Maaranen conducted skeletal analyses on individuals from Bronze Age contexts - recording crania and mandibles using various non-invasive, macroscopic techniques to estimate age, sex and ancestry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was established that selected skulls were sent to Karl Pearson's Biometric Laboratory at University College in London for craniometric study as part of wider programmes of research into ancient populations. After the war, changes in the organisation of the Eugenics Department at the University led to the transfer of Pearson's collection of human skulls to the Duckworth Laboratory in Cambridge, where attempts to get the material published were unsuccessful.The current skeletal analysis of the assemblage revealed a preference for adult individuals, in line with the curation motivations of the original investigators. Earlier research on these remains was compared with our new data and contextualised within the theoretical and methodological development of bioanthropology and osteology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our investigation successfully identified the history of this assemblage, and revealed ethical issues surrounding the collection and subsequent use of some of these human remains, particularly where there may be familial links to modern Palestinian populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":74359,"journal":{"name":"Open research Europe","volume":"5 ","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open research Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.18758.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the 1920s and 1930s Flinders Petrie excavated several sites in British Mandate Palestine (Tell Jemmeh, Tell Fara and Tell el-'Ajjul), encountering numerous burials dating from the Chalcolithic period down to the Ottoman period. The osteological finds were thought to have been discarded, until the authors identified a curated selection of skeletal human remains from these tombs at the Duckworth Laboratory in Cambridge in 2017/2018.

Methods: Rachael Sparks conducted archival research to explore how the human remains from Petrie's excavations in the Southern Levant were recovered, recorded, curated and studied. This drew on original excavation records, contemporary publications, official and private correspondence, unpublished research notes, and the evidence of the human skeletal remains themselves.Following on this archival investigation, Nina Maaranen conducted skeletal analyses on individuals from Bronze Age contexts - recording crania and mandibles using various non-invasive, macroscopic techniques to estimate age, sex and ancestry.

Results: It was established that selected skulls were sent to Karl Pearson's Biometric Laboratory at University College in London for craniometric study as part of wider programmes of research into ancient populations. After the war, changes in the organisation of the Eugenics Department at the University led to the transfer of Pearson's collection of human skulls to the Duckworth Laboratory in Cambridge, where attempts to get the material published were unsuccessful.The current skeletal analysis of the assemblage revealed a preference for adult individuals, in line with the curation motivations of the original investigators. Earlier research on these remains was compared with our new data and contextualised within the theoretical and methodological development of bioanthropology and osteology.

Conclusions: Our investigation successfully identified the history of this assemblage, and revealed ethical issues surrounding the collection and subsequent use of some of these human remains, particularly where there may be familial links to modern Palestinian populations.

证据:弗林德斯·皮特里在英国托管巴勒斯坦挖掘的人类遗骸。
背景:在20世纪20年代和30年代,Flinders Petrie在英国托管的巴勒斯坦挖掘了几个遗址(Tell Jemmeh, Tell Fara和Tell el- Ajjul),遇到了许多从铜器时代到奥斯曼帝国时期的墓葬。这些骨骼学上的发现被认为已经被丢弃了,直到作者在2017/2018年在剑桥的达克沃斯实验室从这些坟墓中发现了精心挑选的人类骨骼遗骸。方法:Rachael Sparks进行了档案研究,探索Petrie在黎凡特南部发掘的人类遗骸是如何被发现、记录、整理和研究的。这项研究利用了原始的挖掘记录、当代出版物、官方和私人信件、未发表的研究笔记以及人类骨骼遗骸本身的证据。在档案调查之后,Nina Maaranen对青铜时代的个体进行了骨骼分析——使用各种非侵入性的宏观技术记录颅骨和下颌骨,以估计年龄、性别和祖先。结果:选定的头骨被送到伦敦大学学院卡尔·皮尔逊的生物测量实验室进行颅测量研究,这是对古代人群研究的更广泛计划的一部分。战后,牛津大学优生学系的组织结构发生了变化,皮尔逊收集的人类头骨被转移到剑桥的达克沃斯实验室,在那里,他试图发表这些材料,但没有成功。目前对该组合的骨骼分析显示了对成年个体的偏好,这与最初研究人员的策展动机一致。对这些遗骸的早期研究与我们的新数据进行了比较,并在生物人类学和骨学的理论和方法发展中进行了背景分析。结论:我们的调查成功地确定了这一群体的历史,并揭示了围绕这些人类遗骸的收集和随后使用的伦理问题,特别是在可能与现代巴勒斯坦人口有家族联系的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信