Canal wall and ossicle chain reconstruction with tragal cartilage/perichondrium composite grafts in endoscopic resection of middle ear and antrum cholesteatomas.

Kai-Fen Chuang, Yuan-Yung Lin, Chao-Yin Kuo, Hsin-Chien Chen, Chih-Hung Wang, Cheng-Ping Shih
{"title":"Canal wall and ossicle chain reconstruction with tragal cartilage/perichondrium composite grafts in endoscopic resection of middle ear and antrum cholesteatomas.","authors":"Kai-Fen Chuang, Yuan-Yung Lin, Chao-Yin Kuo, Hsin-Chien Chen, Chih-Hung Wang, Cheng-Ping Shih","doi":"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Compared to the microscopic approach (MA), the endoscopic approach (EA) is more challenging for the removal of cholesteatomas and reconstruction of the ossicle chain and canal wall. We presented a surgical technique for rebuilding the canal wall and ossicle chain with tragal cartilage/perichondrium composite grafts in the resection of cholesteatomas under EA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study consisted of 24 cases undergoing EA (EA group) for cholesteatomas destroying the ossicles and 28 cases undergoing MA (MA group). The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of ossiculoplasty, the stability of the reconstructed canal wall and the recurrence rate of cholesteatoma in EA group. The postoperative outcomes between TEA and MA groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In EA subgroup with an intact stapes superstructure, the pre- and postoperative air conduction (AC) thresholds and pre- and postoperative air-bone gap (ABG) were 42 ± 13.0, 37 ± 13.7, 23 ± 13.9 and 18 ± 14.8 dB, respectively. AC thresholds and ABG were significantly improved after the operation (p=0.003 and p=0.004, respectively). Gain in AC thresholds was 7.2 ± 11.1 dB in EA group and 1.6 ± 14.5 dB in MA group. There was no significant difference in the gain between two groups (p = 0.615). In EA group, two cases suffered cholesteatoma recurrence, with a recurrence rate of 8.3%. The recurrence rate was 10.7% in MA group. There was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between two groups (p = 0.772).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our endoscopic method had a comparable result to MA in the treatment of cholesteatomas involving the ossicle. The technique has the advantage of leaving both a smaller surgical wound and an invisible scar. The composite graft can be easily modified for reconstruction of canal wall defects and ossiculoplasty. Patients with an intact stapes superstructure had better hearing outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Compared to the microscopic approach (MA), the endoscopic approach (EA) is more challenging for the removal of cholesteatomas and reconstruction of the ossicle chain and canal wall. We presented a surgical technique for rebuilding the canal wall and ossicle chain with tragal cartilage/perichondrium composite grafts in the resection of cholesteatomas under EA.

Methods: This retrospective study consisted of 24 cases undergoing EA (EA group) for cholesteatomas destroying the ossicles and 28 cases undergoing MA (MA group). The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of ossiculoplasty, the stability of the reconstructed canal wall and the recurrence rate of cholesteatoma in EA group. The postoperative outcomes between TEA and MA groups were compared.

Results: In EA subgroup with an intact stapes superstructure, the pre- and postoperative air conduction (AC) thresholds and pre- and postoperative air-bone gap (ABG) were 42 ± 13.0, 37 ± 13.7, 23 ± 13.9 and 18 ± 14.8 dB, respectively. AC thresholds and ABG were significantly improved after the operation (p=0.003 and p=0.004, respectively). Gain in AC thresholds was 7.2 ± 11.1 dB in EA group and 1.6 ± 14.5 dB in MA group. There was no significant difference in the gain between two groups (p = 0.615). In EA group, two cases suffered cholesteatoma recurrence, with a recurrence rate of 8.3%. The recurrence rate was 10.7% in MA group. There was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between two groups (p = 0.772).

Conclusion: Our endoscopic method had a comparable result to MA in the treatment of cholesteatomas involving the ossicle. The technique has the advantage of leaving both a smaller surgical wound and an invisible scar. The composite graft can be easily modified for reconstruction of canal wall defects and ossiculoplasty. Patients with an intact stapes superstructure had better hearing outcomes.

耳门软骨/软骨膜复合移植物重建管壁和听骨链在内镜下中耳和鼻窦胆脂瘤切除术中的应用。
背景:与显微入路(MA)相比,内镜入路(EA)在切除胆脂瘤和重建听骨链和管壁方面更具挑战性。方法:回顾性分析24例破坏小骨的胆脂瘤行EA组(EA组),28例行MA组(MA组)。本研究的目的是分析EA组听骨成形术的效果、重建管壁的稳定性和胆脂瘤的复发率。比较TEA组和MA组的术后结果。结果:镫骨上部结构完整的EA亚组,术前和术后空气传导阈值(AC)分别为42±13.0、37±13.7、23±13.9和18±14.8 dB。术后AC阈值和ABG均显著改善(p=0.003和p=0.004)。EA组交流阈值增益为7.2±11.1 dB, MA组为1.6±14.5 dB。两组患者的增重无显著差异(p = 0.615)。EA组胆脂瘤复发2例,复发率8.3%。MA组复发率为10.7%。两组复发率比较差异无统计学意义(p = 0.772)。结论:我们的内镜方法在治疗累及听骨的胆脂瘤方面具有与MA相当的结果。这项技术的优点是既能留下更小的手术伤口,又能留下看不见的疤痕。复合移植物可以很容易地用于管壁缺损的重建和听骨成形术。镫骨上部结构完整的患者听力效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信