Associations of Frailty, Concerns About Falling, and Fall Risk in Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Orlando, Florida: A Preliminary Analysis.

Abigail L Tice, Rui Xie, Wei Zhang, Norma E Conner, Yingru Li, Christopher T Emrich, Qun Huo, Ladda Thiamwong
{"title":"Associations of Frailty, Concerns About Falling, and Fall Risk in Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Orlando, Florida: A Preliminary Analysis.","authors":"Abigail L Tice, Rui Xie, Wei Zhang, Norma E Conner, Yingru Li, Christopher T Emrich, Qun Huo, Ladda Thiamwong","doi":"10.22540/JFSF-10-018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examines relationships between frailty, concerns about falling (CaF), and fall risk in community-dwelling older adults (≥60 years old).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Frailty, CaF, and fall risk were cross-sectionally assessed using the FRAIL, short FES-I, and STEADI questionnaires in 178 participants. Spearman correlations, logistical regression, and ordinal regression analysis were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>38.2% of participants were robust, 48.9% pre-frail, and 12.9% frail. Logistic regressions revealed that frail individuals were 91.4% more likely to have CaF compared to non-frail individuals, and individuals with lower fall risk were 5.7 times less likely to have CaF than those with no fall risk. Pre-frail individuals were more likely to have fall risk than non-frail individuals. Individuals with low CaF were 6 times less likely to have fall risk than those with high CaF. Ordinal logistic regressions revealed that for individuals with no CaF and no fall risk, the odds of being frail were 69.5% and 86.7% lower, respectively, than those with high CaF and high fall risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frailty relationships with fall risk and CaF indicate the importance of addressing frailty to aid in fall prevention in older adults. Further, addressing the CaF mentality is important in fall prevention in older adults. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05778604.</p>","PeriodicalId":73754,"journal":{"name":"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls","volume":"10 1","pages":"18-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22540/JFSF-10-018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study examines relationships between frailty, concerns about falling (CaF), and fall risk in community-dwelling older adults (≥60 years old).

Methods: Frailty, CaF, and fall risk were cross-sectionally assessed using the FRAIL, short FES-I, and STEADI questionnaires in 178 participants. Spearman correlations, logistical regression, and ordinal regression analysis were performed.

Results: 38.2% of participants were robust, 48.9% pre-frail, and 12.9% frail. Logistic regressions revealed that frail individuals were 91.4% more likely to have CaF compared to non-frail individuals, and individuals with lower fall risk were 5.7 times less likely to have CaF than those with no fall risk. Pre-frail individuals were more likely to have fall risk than non-frail individuals. Individuals with low CaF were 6 times less likely to have fall risk than those with high CaF. Ordinal logistic regressions revealed that for individuals with no CaF and no fall risk, the odds of being frail were 69.5% and 86.7% lower, respectively, than those with high CaF and high fall risk.

Conclusions: Frailty relationships with fall risk and CaF indicate the importance of addressing frailty to aid in fall prevention in older adults. Further, addressing the CaF mentality is important in fall prevention in older adults. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05778604.

佛罗里达州奥兰多社区居住老年人的虚弱、对跌倒的担忧和跌倒风险的关联:初步分析。
目的:本研究探讨了居住在社区的老年人(≥60岁)的虚弱、担心跌倒(CaF)和跌倒风险之间的关系。方法:对178名参与者使用虚弱、短FES-I和STEADI问卷对虚弱、CaF和跌倒风险进行横断面评估。进行Spearman相关、逻辑回归和有序回归分析。结果:38.2%的参与者身体健康,48.9%的参与者体弱,12.9%的参与者体弱。Logistic回归显示,与非体弱个体相比,体弱个体患CaF的可能性高91.4%,而跌倒风险较低的个体患CaF的可能性比没有跌倒风险的个体低5.7倍。体弱多病的人比非体弱多病的人更有可能摔倒。咖啡因含量低的人跌倒的风险比咖啡因含量高的人低6倍。有序logistic回归显示,对于无CaF和无跌倒风险的个体,体弱的几率分别比高CaF和高跌倒风险的个体低69.5%和86.7%。结论:虚弱与跌倒风险和CaF的关系表明,解决虚弱有助于老年人预防跌倒的重要性。此外,解决CaF心态对老年人预防跌倒很重要。ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05778604。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信