Comparison of Swept-Source Anterior Segment Ocular Coherence Tomography and Gonioscopy in Detecting Anterior Chamber Angle Closure.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2025-02-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S498949
Panhathai Yaisiri, Natthanose Panarojwongse, Isaraporn Treesit, Raveewan Choontanom, Ornwasee Jatuthong, Wallop Iemsomboon, Panrapee Funarunart
{"title":"Comparison of Swept-Source Anterior Segment Ocular Coherence Tomography and Gonioscopy in Detecting Anterior Chamber Angle Closure.","authors":"Panhathai Yaisiri, Natthanose Panarojwongse, Isaraporn Treesit, Raveewan Choontanom, Ornwasee Jatuthong, Wallop Iemsomboon, Panrapee Funarunart","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S498949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the diagnostic accuracy of swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) with gonioscopy in detecting angle closure among narrow-angle suspected eyes.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 125 eyes determined narrow anterior chamber angles suspected by Van Herick's technique grade 0, 1, or 2 were recruited. AS-OCT was undergone before any contact procedure. Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using applanation tonometry and gonioscopy were performed, respectively. AS-OCT images were blindly interpreted by 3 glaucoma specialists, involving both qualitative assessments at 0, 90, 180, and 270 degrees and quantitative analysis using iris-trabecular contact (ITC) index. The sensitivity and specificity of AS-OCT, compared with gonioscopy-the gold standard for identifying anterior chamber angle closure-were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 61±12.9 years, and females constituted 67.6%. Eyes classified by Van Herick's technique as grade 0, 1 and 2 were 16%, 58.40%, and 25.60%, respectively. Closed-angle identified by gonioscopy and AS-OCT were 100 eyes (80%) and 102 eyes (81.60%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of AS-OCT in detecting angle-closure were 92.16% (95% CI, 87.44-96.87) and 73.91% (66.22-81.61), respectively. For angle-closure identified by ITC index ≥ 55%, sensitivity was 86.36% (77.53-95.20) and specificity was 92.86 (86.23-99.49). The inter-observer agreement of gonioscopy was moderate (Kappa = 0.55), while the intra-observer and inter-observer agreement of AS-OCT was substantial (Kappa = 0.71-0.80 and Kappa = 0.69, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AS-OCT enables a contactless qualitative and quantitative assessment of angle-closure in narrow-angle suspected eyes, demonstrating high sensitivity, acceptable specificity, and good inter-observer and intra-observer reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"699-711"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11874767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S498949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) with gonioscopy in detecting angle closure among narrow-angle suspected eyes.

Patients and methods: A total of 125 eyes determined narrow anterior chamber angles suspected by Van Herick's technique grade 0, 1, or 2 were recruited. AS-OCT was undergone before any contact procedure. Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using applanation tonometry and gonioscopy were performed, respectively. AS-OCT images were blindly interpreted by 3 glaucoma specialists, involving both qualitative assessments at 0, 90, 180, and 270 degrees and quantitative analysis using iris-trabecular contact (ITC) index. The sensitivity and specificity of AS-OCT, compared with gonioscopy-the gold standard for identifying anterior chamber angle closure-were calculated.

Results: The mean age was 61±12.9 years, and females constituted 67.6%. Eyes classified by Van Herick's technique as grade 0, 1 and 2 were 16%, 58.40%, and 25.60%, respectively. Closed-angle identified by gonioscopy and AS-OCT were 100 eyes (80%) and 102 eyes (81.60%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of AS-OCT in detecting angle-closure were 92.16% (95% CI, 87.44-96.87) and 73.91% (66.22-81.61), respectively. For angle-closure identified by ITC index ≥ 55%, sensitivity was 86.36% (77.53-95.20) and specificity was 92.86 (86.23-99.49). The inter-observer agreement of gonioscopy was moderate (Kappa = 0.55), while the intra-observer and inter-observer agreement of AS-OCT was substantial (Kappa = 0.71-0.80 and Kappa = 0.69, respectively).

Conclusion: AS-OCT enables a contactless qualitative and quantitative assessment of angle-closure in narrow-angle suspected eyes, demonstrating high sensitivity, acceptable specificity, and good inter-observer and intra-observer reliability.

扫源前段眼相干断层扫描与角镜检查前房闭角的比较。
目的:比较扫源前段光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT)与角镜检查对窄角疑似眼闭合性的诊断准确性。患者和方法:共招募125只经Van Herick技术0、1或2级诊断为狭窄前房角的眼睛。在任何接触程序之前进行AS-OCT。眼压(IOP)测量分别采用眼压计和眼膜镜。3名青光眼专家对AS-OCT图像进行盲解译,包括0度、90度、180度和270度的定性评估,以及虹膜-小梁接触指数(ITC)的定量分析。计算了AS-OCT与gonioscopy(鉴别前房角闭合的金标准)的敏感性和特异性。结果:平均年龄61±12.9岁,女性占67.6%。按Van Herick’s技术分为0级、1级和2级的眼睛分别为16%、58.40%和25.60%。角膜镜及AS-OCT检出闭角分别为100眼(80%)和102眼(81.60%)。AS-OCT检测闭角的灵敏度和特异性分别为92.16% (95% CI, 87.44 ~ 96.87)和73.91%(66.22 ~ 81.61)。ITC指数≥55%时,敏感性为86.36%(77.53 ~ 95.20),特异性为92.86(86.23 ~ 99.49)。而AS-OCT的观察者内部和观察者之间的一致性比较高(Kappa分别为0.71-0.80和0.69)。结论:AS-OCT能够对疑似窄角眼的闭角进行非接触式定性和定量评估,具有高灵敏度、可接受的特异性和良好的观察者间和观察者内信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信