Impact of intermediate home-based care on functional health of older adults with stroke in low-income and middle-income countries: A systematic review.

IF 2.8 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports Pub Date : 2025-02-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/25424823251318227
Temitope Hannah Farombi, Hafiz Ta Khan, Muili Lawal, Rufus Akinyemi
{"title":"Impact of intermediate home-based care on functional health of older adults with stroke in low-income and middle-income countries: A systematic review.","authors":"Temitope Hannah Farombi, Hafiz Ta Khan, Muili Lawal, Rufus Akinyemi","doi":"10.1177/25424823251318227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Intermediate care services are designed to facilitate transition from medical dependence to functional independence, ultimately improving the overall quality of life. Despite the recognized benefits of intermediate care in rehabilitation, data on its impact on functional outcomes for older adults with stroke in low- and middle-income countries are limited. <b>Objective:</b> This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and outcomes of an intermediate care model among older adults with stroke. <b>Methods:</b> This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Scopus, EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and reference lists of manually selected articles were searched. Only studies published in English from 2012 to 2023 were included. Randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies focusing on functional improvement in motor function, activities of daily living (ADLs), and quality of life in older adults with stroke receiving home-based or community intermediate care were considered. Data extraction utilized the PICO framework. Three reviewers independently conducted a critical appraisal and risk of bias assessments, with two additional reviewers resolving any discrepancies. <b>Results:</b> Eleven studies from low- and middle-income countries were included. The interventions varied, encompassing exercise programs, therapy sessions, video-based programs, reminiscence therapy, and caregiver-assisted therapy, targeting various aspects of stroke recovery and rehabilitation. The interventions demonstrated positive effects on functional outcomes, significantly improving ADLs and overall quality of life. <b>Conclusions:</b> Despite variability in functional outcomes, the study highlights that implementing home-based intermediate care can be crucial for stroke patients in low-resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":73594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports","volume":"9 ","pages":"25424823251318227"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864240/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25424823251318227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intermediate care services are designed to facilitate transition from medical dependence to functional independence, ultimately improving the overall quality of life. Despite the recognized benefits of intermediate care in rehabilitation, data on its impact on functional outcomes for older adults with stroke in low- and middle-income countries are limited. Objective: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and outcomes of an intermediate care model among older adults with stroke. Methods: This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Scopus, EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and reference lists of manually selected articles were searched. Only studies published in English from 2012 to 2023 were included. Randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies focusing on functional improvement in motor function, activities of daily living (ADLs), and quality of life in older adults with stroke receiving home-based or community intermediate care were considered. Data extraction utilized the PICO framework. Three reviewers independently conducted a critical appraisal and risk of bias assessments, with two additional reviewers resolving any discrepancies. Results: Eleven studies from low- and middle-income countries were included. The interventions varied, encompassing exercise programs, therapy sessions, video-based programs, reminiscence therapy, and caregiver-assisted therapy, targeting various aspects of stroke recovery and rehabilitation. The interventions demonstrated positive effects on functional outcomes, significantly improving ADLs and overall quality of life. Conclusions: Despite variability in functional outcomes, the study highlights that implementing home-based intermediate care can be crucial for stroke patients in low-resource settings.

在低收入和中等收入国家,中等家庭护理对老年脑卒中患者功能健康的影响:一项系统综述。
背景:中间护理服务旨在促进从医疗依赖到功能独立的过渡,最终提高整体生活质量。尽管人们认识到中间护理在康复中的益处,但关于其对中低收入国家老年脑卒中患者功能结局影响的数据有限。目的:本系统综述旨在评估老年脑卒中患者中间护理模式的有效性和结果。方法:本系统评价遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。检索了Scopus, EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE,谷歌Scholar和人工选择文章的参考文献列表。仅纳入了2012年至2023年用英语发表的研究。随机对照试验和准实验研究的重点是运动功能的改善,日常生活活动(ADLs)和生活质量的老年中风患者接受家庭或社区中间护理。数据提取采用PICO框架。三名审稿人独立进行了批判性评估和偏倚风险评估,另外两名审稿人解决了任何差异。结果:纳入了来自中低收入国家的11项研究。干预措施多种多样,包括锻炼计划、治疗课程、基于视频的计划、回忆疗法和护理人员辅助疗法,针对中风恢复和康复的各个方面。这些干预措施对功能结果显示出积极的影响,显著改善了adl和整体生活质量。结论:尽管功能结果存在差异,但该研究强调,在资源匮乏的环境中,实施以家庭为基础的中间护理对中风患者至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信