Examining dynamic patterns of problematic cannabis use: Results from a multilevel network analysis.

IF 3.1 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of psychopathology and clinical science Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1037/abn0000963
Marilyn L Piccirillo, Matthew C Enkema, Frank J Schwebel, Jessica R Canning, Diana Bachowski, Mary E Larimer
{"title":"Examining dynamic patterns of problematic cannabis use: Results from a multilevel network analysis.","authors":"Marilyn L Piccirillo, Matthew C Enkema, Frank J Schwebel, Jessica R Canning, Diana Bachowski, Mary E Larimer","doi":"10.1037/abn0000963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Young adults who engage in problematic cannabis use report lower work and interpersonal functioning yet are less likely to seek treatment, necessitating alternative methods for assessing and intervening on problematic cannabis use (e.g., mobile health applications to self-monitor drivers of cannabis use in daily life). However, previous work examining maintenance models of problematic cannabis use has primarily focused on modeling predictors of cannabis use as measured using static retrospective report rather than examining cannabis use as a series of interactions that unfold in everyday life. In this study, we analyzed ecological momentary assessment data (<i>T</i> = 3,230 observations) from 65 young adults who reported problematic cannabis use (Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test-Revised: <i>M</i> = 10.38, <i>SD</i> = 4.35) and an interest in reducing their use. We used multilevel network analyses to model associations among biopsychosocial factors that aligned with social learning, self-medication, and experiential avoidance theories of substance use. Network models demonstrated consistent associations between socioenvironmental triggers and cannabis cravings, use, and intoxication that were nearly all clinically meaningful in size (<i>b</i>s > 0.10). Results indicated a statistically significant association between negative and positive affect with cannabis use and intoxication, respectively; however, these associations were not clinically meaningful in size. There were no clinically meaningful associations between coping strategies and cannabis use variables. Findings advance our understanding of cannabis use in everyday life, which is critical for refining more dynamic conceptualization of substance use and improving the precision of clinical assessments. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":73914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","volume":" ","pages":"298-307"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036628/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Young adults who engage in problematic cannabis use report lower work and interpersonal functioning yet are less likely to seek treatment, necessitating alternative methods for assessing and intervening on problematic cannabis use (e.g., mobile health applications to self-monitor drivers of cannabis use in daily life). However, previous work examining maintenance models of problematic cannabis use has primarily focused on modeling predictors of cannabis use as measured using static retrospective report rather than examining cannabis use as a series of interactions that unfold in everyday life. In this study, we analyzed ecological momentary assessment data (T = 3,230 observations) from 65 young adults who reported problematic cannabis use (Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test-Revised: M = 10.38, SD = 4.35) and an interest in reducing their use. We used multilevel network analyses to model associations among biopsychosocial factors that aligned with social learning, self-medication, and experiential avoidance theories of substance use. Network models demonstrated consistent associations between socioenvironmental triggers and cannabis cravings, use, and intoxication that were nearly all clinically meaningful in size (bs > 0.10). Results indicated a statistically significant association between negative and positive affect with cannabis use and intoxication, respectively; however, these associations were not clinically meaningful in size. There were no clinically meaningful associations between coping strategies and cannabis use variables. Findings advance our understanding of cannabis use in everyday life, which is critical for refining more dynamic conceptualization of substance use and improving the precision of clinical assessments. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

检查有问题的大麻使用的动态模式:来自多层次网络分析的结果。
有问题使用大麻的年轻人报告说,他们的工作和人际功能较差,但不太可能寻求治疗,因此需要有其他方法来评估和干预有问题的大麻使用(例如,在日常生活中自我监测大麻使用驱动因素的移动健康应用程序)。然而,以前研究有问题的大麻使用维持模型的工作主要集中在使用静态回顾性报告对大麻使用的预测因素进行建模,而不是将大麻使用作为日常生活中展开的一系列相互作用进行研究。在这项研究中,我们分析了来自65名报告有问题的大麻使用(大麻使用障碍识别测试修订:M = 10.38, SD = 4.35)并有兴趣减少大麻使用的年轻人的生态短暂评估数据(T = 3230个观察值)。我们使用多层次网络分析来模拟与社会学习、自我用药和物质使用经验回避理论相一致的生物心理社会因素之间的关联。网络模型表明,社会环境触发因素与大麻渴望、使用和中毒之间存在一致的关联,这些关联的大小几乎都具有临床意义(bs > 0.10)。结果表明,消极影响和积极影响分别与大麻使用和中毒有统计学显著关联;然而,这些关联在大小上没有临床意义。应对策略和大麻使用变量之间没有临床意义的关联。研究结果促进了我们对日常生活中大麻使用的理解,这对于提炼更动态的物质使用概念化和提高临床评估的准确性至关重要。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信