Less is more: evaluating the impact of transitions of care pharmacist-led optimization on discharge antibiotic therapy duration in the emergency department.

Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE Pub Date : 2025-02-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/ash.2025.22
Joel Zapata, Sandra Adeife, James B Cutrell, Lindsay Jacobs, Marguerite L Monogue, Michelle Ramos, James Sanders, Chen-Ching Wang, Esther Y Golnabi
{"title":"Less is more: evaluating the impact of transitions of care pharmacist-led optimization on discharge antibiotic therapy duration in the emergency department.","authors":"Joel Zapata, Sandra Adeife, James B Cutrell, Lindsay Jacobs, Marguerite L Monogue, Michelle Ramos, James Sanders, Chen-Ching Wang, Esther Y Golnabi","doi":"10.1017/ash.2025.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients discharged from emergency departments (ED) with antibiotics for common infections often receive unnecessarily prolonged durations, representing a target for transition of care (TOC) antimicrobial stewardship intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of TOC pharmacists' review on decreasing the duration of discharge oral antibiotics in patients discharged from the ED at an academic medical center. Pharmacist interventions were guided by an antibiotic duration of therapy guidance focused on respiratory, urinary, and skin infections developed and implemented by the antimicrobial stewardship program. Pharmacist interventions from January 27, 2023, to December 29, 2023, were analyzed to quantify the total number of antibiotic days saved and the percentage of provider acceptance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ED TOC pharmacists reviewed a total of 157 oral antibiotic prescriptions. 86.6% percent of the reviews required pharmacist interventions. The most common indications for the discharge antibiotics were urinary tract infections (50.0%) and skin infections (23.4%). The total number of antibiotic days saved was 155 days with the provider acceptance rate of 76.5%. In 21% of cases, providers did not count the antibiotic doses administered in the ED, contributing to unnecessarily prolonged duration. 10.2% of patients re-presented to the ED while 6.4% of patients were hospitalized within 30 days of index ED discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The transitions of care pharmacist-led intervention was successful in optimizing the duration of discharge oral antibiotics in the ED utilizing prospective audit and feedback based on institutional guidance. The ED represents a high-yield setting for TOC-directed antimicrobial stewardship.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"5 1","pages":"e66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869057/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients discharged from emergency departments (ED) with antibiotics for common infections often receive unnecessarily prolonged durations, representing a target for transition of care (TOC) antimicrobial stewardship intervention.

Methods: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of TOC pharmacists' review on decreasing the duration of discharge oral antibiotics in patients discharged from the ED at an academic medical center. Pharmacist interventions were guided by an antibiotic duration of therapy guidance focused on respiratory, urinary, and skin infections developed and implemented by the antimicrobial stewardship program. Pharmacist interventions from January 27, 2023, to December 29, 2023, were analyzed to quantify the total number of antibiotic days saved and the percentage of provider acceptance.

Results: The ED TOC pharmacists reviewed a total of 157 oral antibiotic prescriptions. 86.6% percent of the reviews required pharmacist interventions. The most common indications for the discharge antibiotics were urinary tract infections (50.0%) and skin infections (23.4%). The total number of antibiotic days saved was 155 days with the provider acceptance rate of 76.5%. In 21% of cases, providers did not count the antibiotic doses administered in the ED, contributing to unnecessarily prolonged duration. 10.2% of patients re-presented to the ED while 6.4% of patients were hospitalized within 30 days of index ED discharge.

Conclusion: The transitions of care pharmacist-led intervention was successful in optimizing the duration of discharge oral antibiotics in the ED utilizing prospective audit and feedback based on institutional guidance. The ED represents a high-yield setting for TOC-directed antimicrobial stewardship.

少即是多:评估由药剂师主导的护理过渡优化对急诊科出院抗生素治疗持续时间的影响。
背景:因常见感染而使用抗生素从急诊科(ED)出院的患者往往不必要地延长住院时间,这是护理过渡(TOC)抗菌药物管理干预的一个目标。方法:本研究旨在评价TOC药师点评对减少某学术医疗中心急诊科出院患者口服抗生素出院时间的效果。由抗菌药物管理计划制定并实施的针对呼吸道、泌尿和皮肤感染的抗生素治疗持续时间指导药师干预。分析2023年1月27日至2023年12月29日的药师干预措施,量化节省的抗生素总天数和提供者接受的百分比。结果:ED TOC药师共审查了157张口服抗生素处方。86.6%的综述需要药师干预。出院时使用抗生素最常见的指征是尿路感染(50.0%)和皮肤感染(23.4%)。节省抗生素总天数155天,提供者合格率为76.5%。在21%的病例中,提供者没有计算在急诊科使用的抗生素剂量,导致不必要的持续时间延长。10.2%的患者再次出现在急诊科,而6.4%的患者在急诊科指数出院后30天内住院。结论:利用前瞻性审计和基于机构指导的反馈,护理药师主导的干预过渡成功地优化了急诊科出院口服抗生素的持续时间。ED代表了toc导向抗菌药物管理的高产设置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信