Mario García-Suárez, Beatriz Ordás-Campos, Jesús Antonio Fernández-Fernández, Carlos Méndez-Martínez, Juan Gómez-Salgado, Daniel Fernández-García
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Smoking Awareness Among Nursing Students and Professionals in Spain.","authors":"Mario García-Suárez, Beatriz Ordás-Campos, Jesús Antonio Fernández-Fernández, Carlos Méndez-Martínez, Juan Gómez-Salgado, Daniel Fernández-García","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S501043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tobacco consumption is considered one of the main risk factors in the development of non-communicable diseases such as respiratory, cardiovascular, or oncological diseases, among others. Nurses play an important role in identifying smokers and making them aware of the consequences of tobacco use, advising them on smoking cessation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to carry out a comparative analysis of the level of smoking awareness among nursing students and professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Descriptive cross-sectional study using an anonymous self-administered questionnaire, previously validated. This questionnaire was given to nursing students between March and June 2022 and to nursing professionals between January and March 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of tobacco use was found to be 14.5% among nursing students and 19.1% among nursing professionals. Regarding the level of awareness, professionals always obtained better results than students, with statistically significant differences when analysing the mean scores obtained in the questionnaires regarding awareness of the effects of tobacco consumption in active smokers (8.72 vs 8.07; p<0.001) and of the pathologies that could manifest in passive smokers (5.49 vs 5.27; p=0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the analysis show that professionals seem to be better educated and to use tobacco more than students. The awareness that professionals have about the different consequences of active and/or passive smoking does not lead to a decrease in the prevalence of smoking, probably because the number of years they have been using cigarettes is much higher than that of students. Similarly, proving an acceptable level of awareness does not result in professionals promoting smoking cessation programmes.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"605-616"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869760/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S501043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Tobacco consumption is considered one of the main risk factors in the development of non-communicable diseases such as respiratory, cardiovascular, or oncological diseases, among others. Nurses play an important role in identifying smokers and making them aware of the consequences of tobacco use, advising them on smoking cessation.
Objective: The aim of this study was to carry out a comparative analysis of the level of smoking awareness among nursing students and professionals.
Methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study using an anonymous self-administered questionnaire, previously validated. This questionnaire was given to nursing students between March and June 2022 and to nursing professionals between January and March 2023.
Results: The prevalence of tobacco use was found to be 14.5% among nursing students and 19.1% among nursing professionals. Regarding the level of awareness, professionals always obtained better results than students, with statistically significant differences when analysing the mean scores obtained in the questionnaires regarding awareness of the effects of tobacco consumption in active smokers (8.72 vs 8.07; p<0.001) and of the pathologies that could manifest in passive smokers (5.49 vs 5.27; p=0.008).
Conclusion: The results of the analysis show that professionals seem to be better educated and to use tobacco more than students. The awareness that professionals have about the different consequences of active and/or passive smoking does not lead to a decrease in the prevalence of smoking, probably because the number of years they have been using cigarettes is much higher than that of students. Similarly, proving an acceptable level of awareness does not result in professionals promoting smoking cessation programmes.
期刊介绍:
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include:
Public and community health
Policy and law
Preventative and predictive healthcare
Risk and hazard management
Epidemiology, detection and screening
Lifestyle and diet modification
Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs
Health and safety and occupational health
Healthcare services provision
Health literacy and education
Advertising and promotion of health issues
Health economic evaluations and resource management
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.