Minjee Kim, Carleton Eduardo Corrales, Anthony A Prince, Anne Li, Maria Edelen, Bevan Yueh, Jennifer J Shin
{"title":"Validation of a Novel Adaptive Inner EAR Scale to Intelligently Quantify the Impact of Hearing Loss.","authors":"Minjee Kim, Carleton Eduardo Corrales, Anthony A Prince, Anne Li, Maria Edelen, Bevan Yueh, Jennifer J Shin","doi":"10.1002/lary.32087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and validate a novel adaptive version of the Inner EAR scale, which efficiently quantifies the patient-centered impact of hearing loss. Adaptive testing is a vetted, established means to provide targeted questions that assess each individual to achieve increased accuracy with less work for respondents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective validation study was performed. The adaptive test was developed through factor analysis, item response theory assessments, and evaluation of internal consistency (n = 2200). Convergent and discriminant validity were measured in relation to standard static testing and measured audiometry (n = 513). Assessments of intra-rater reliability and responsiveness to change were also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Factor analysis demonstrated that items reflected one domain (hearing ability). Internal consistency was strong (Cronbach alpha 0.91, 95% CI: > 0.89). Convergent validity was also demonstrated, with positive associations between adaptive scale scores and audiogram results (Spearman rho 0.30, 95% CI: 0.19-0.41), overall PROMIS physical health (Spearman rho 0.29, 95% CI: 0.17-0.40), social health scores, and global overview scores. Intra-rater reliability was also demonstrated (Cohen kappa 0.6, 95% CI: 0.5-0.7). Responsiveness to change and discriminant validity (an increase in adaptive test score of 10 was associated with 10.4-fold increase in odds of normal hearing) were also observed. The adaptive scale had comparable internal consistency, validity, and responsiveness to change, and higher intra-rater reliability than the standard static scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This novel adaptive validated instrument is clinically applicable, internally consistent, reliable, responsive, aligns with audiometry, and has higher reliability than standard static testing.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>2 (diagnostic or monitoring test).</p>","PeriodicalId":49921,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32087","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To develop and validate a novel adaptive version of the Inner EAR scale, which efficiently quantifies the patient-centered impact of hearing loss. Adaptive testing is a vetted, established means to provide targeted questions that assess each individual to achieve increased accuracy with less work for respondents.
Methods: A prospective validation study was performed. The adaptive test was developed through factor analysis, item response theory assessments, and evaluation of internal consistency (n = 2200). Convergent and discriminant validity were measured in relation to standard static testing and measured audiometry (n = 513). Assessments of intra-rater reliability and responsiveness to change were also performed.
Results: Factor analysis demonstrated that items reflected one domain (hearing ability). Internal consistency was strong (Cronbach alpha 0.91, 95% CI: > 0.89). Convergent validity was also demonstrated, with positive associations between adaptive scale scores and audiogram results (Spearman rho 0.30, 95% CI: 0.19-0.41), overall PROMIS physical health (Spearman rho 0.29, 95% CI: 0.17-0.40), social health scores, and global overview scores. Intra-rater reliability was also demonstrated (Cohen kappa 0.6, 95% CI: 0.5-0.7). Responsiveness to change and discriminant validity (an increase in adaptive test score of 10 was associated with 10.4-fold increase in odds of normal hearing) were also observed. The adaptive scale had comparable internal consistency, validity, and responsiveness to change, and higher intra-rater reliability than the standard static scale.
Conclusions: This novel adaptive validated instrument is clinically applicable, internally consistent, reliable, responsive, aligns with audiometry, and has higher reliability than standard static testing.
Level of evidence: 2 (diagnostic or monitoring test).
期刊介绍:
The Laryngoscope has been the leading source of information on advances in the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck disorders since 1890. The Laryngoscope is the first choice among otolaryngologists for publication of their important findings and techniques. Each monthly issue of The Laryngoscope features peer-reviewed medical, clinical, and research contributions in general otolaryngology, allergy/rhinology, otology/neurotology, laryngology/bronchoesophagology, head and neck surgery, sleep medicine, pediatric otolaryngology, facial plastics and reconstructive surgery, oncology, and communicative disorders. Contributions include papers and posters presented at the Annual and Section Meetings of the Triological Society, as well as independent papers, "How I Do It", "Triological Best Practice" articles, and contemporary reviews. Theses authored by the Triological Society’s new Fellows as well as papers presented at meetings of the American Laryngological Association are published in The Laryngoscope.
• Broncho-esophagology
• Communicative disorders
• Head and neck surgery
• Plastic and reconstructive facial surgery
• Oncology
• Speech and hearing defects