Margin Status and Recurrence in Surgically Treated Patients With HPV+ Oropharyngeal Cancer.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Laryngoscope Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1002/lary.32091
Madeleine Ausburn, Justin M Pyne, Andrew T Day, Natalia Hajnas, Dominic Moon, Larry Leonard Myers, David Jonathan Sher, John M Truelson, Brittny Tillman, Baran Sumer
{"title":"Margin Status and Recurrence in Surgically Treated Patients With HPV+ Oropharyngeal Cancer.","authors":"Madeleine Ausburn, Justin M Pyne, Andrew T Day, Natalia Hajnas, Dominic Moon, Larry Leonard Myers, David Jonathan Sher, John M Truelson, Brittny Tillman, Baran Sumer","doi":"10.1002/lary.32091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal margins for surgically treated human papilloma virus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) remain undefined. We evaluated the impact of surgical margins on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with HPV+ OPSCC treated with primary transoral robotic surgery (TORS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing primary TORS from May 2012 to December 2021 for intermediate-risk (T1-T2, resected to clear (≥ 3 mm) or close margins (< 3 mm), and N1-N2) HPV+ OPSCC were included. Survival outcomes were reviewed, and overall and PFS at 3 years posttreatment were determined using Kaplan-Meier analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 69 subjects met inclusion criteria. At a median follow-up of 47 months, overall survival (OS) was 100%, and the PFS was 88.9% for the entire subject group. Among subjects not receiving adjunctive radiotherapy (RT), those with close margins had an OS of 100% and a PFS of 100% (median follow-up 47 months). Subjects with clear margins had an OS probability of 100% and a PFS probability of 100% (median follow-up 47 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In subjects undergoing TORS for HPV+ OPSCC, clear margins did not confer a significant OS or PFS survival advantage compared to those with close margins, even when adjuvant therapy was omitted.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":49921,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The optimal margins for surgically treated human papilloma virus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) remain undefined. We evaluated the impact of surgical margins on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with HPV+ OPSCC treated with primary transoral robotic surgery (TORS).

Methods: Patients undergoing primary TORS from May 2012 to December 2021 for intermediate-risk (T1-T2, resected to clear (≥ 3 mm) or close margins (< 3 mm), and N1-N2) HPV+ OPSCC were included. Survival outcomes were reviewed, and overall and PFS at 3 years posttreatment were determined using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results: A total of 69 subjects met inclusion criteria. At a median follow-up of 47 months, overall survival (OS) was 100%, and the PFS was 88.9% for the entire subject group. Among subjects not receiving adjunctive radiotherapy (RT), those with close margins had an OS of 100% and a PFS of 100% (median follow-up 47 months). Subjects with clear margins had an OS probability of 100% and a PFS probability of 100% (median follow-up 47 months).

Conclusion: In subjects undergoing TORS for HPV+ OPSCC, clear margins did not confer a significant OS or PFS survival advantage compared to those with close margins, even when adjuvant therapy was omitted.

Level of evidence: 3:

HPV+口咽癌手术治疗患者的边缘状态和复发情况
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Laryngoscope
Laryngoscope 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
500
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Laryngoscope has been the leading source of information on advances in the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck disorders since 1890. The Laryngoscope is the first choice among otolaryngologists for publication of their important findings and techniques. Each monthly issue of The Laryngoscope features peer-reviewed medical, clinical, and research contributions in general otolaryngology, allergy/rhinology, otology/neurotology, laryngology/bronchoesophagology, head and neck surgery, sleep medicine, pediatric otolaryngology, facial plastics and reconstructive surgery, oncology, and communicative disorders. Contributions include papers and posters presented at the Annual and Section Meetings of the Triological Society, as well as independent papers, "How I Do It", "Triological Best Practice" articles, and contemporary reviews. Theses authored by the Triological Society’s new Fellows as well as papers presented at meetings of the American Laryngological Association are published in The Laryngoscope. • Broncho-esophagology • Communicative disorders • Head and neck surgery • Plastic and reconstructive facial surgery • Oncology • Speech and hearing defects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信