Investigation of cooling methods and efficiency of firefighters wearing protective clothing after heat exposure.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ERGONOMICS
Chenyi Zheng, Jun Li, Yun Su, Mingxi Zhao, Xianghui Zhang
{"title":"Investigation of cooling methods and efficiency of firefighters wearing protective clothing after heat exposure.","authors":"Chenyi Zheng, Jun Li, Yun Su, Mingxi Zhao, Xianghui Zhang","doi":"10.1080/10803548.2025.2452761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objectives.</i> This study aimed to evaluate four cooling methods (natural cooling method [NCM], stripping cooling method [SCM], fan cooling method [FCM] and water-spray cooling method [WSCM]) for their effectiveness in reducing heat stress and skin burns in firefighters after heat exposure. <i>Methods</i>. Skin heat flow and fabric temperature were measured on a stored energy test device during the exposure and cooling stages. The study assessed thermal protective performance by comparing the cooling methods, noting the time to second-degree burns and the energy released to the skin. <i>Results</i>. The SCM showed the best thermal protective performance, followed by the FCM, NCM and WSCM. No skin burns were observed with the SCM. Compared to the NCM, the FCM extended the time to second-degree burns by 3.2% (F1 fabric system) and 10.7% (F2 fabric system). The SCM had the lowest accumulated energy released to the skin and the highest cooling efficiency. The accumulated stored energy and released energy of the FCM decreased with increasing wind speed, whereas the values for the WSCM increased with longer water spray durations. These results can guide the development of optimal cooling methods to enhance firefighter safety and protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":47704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2025.2452761","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. This study aimed to evaluate four cooling methods (natural cooling method [NCM], stripping cooling method [SCM], fan cooling method [FCM] and water-spray cooling method [WSCM]) for their effectiveness in reducing heat stress and skin burns in firefighters after heat exposure. Methods. Skin heat flow and fabric temperature were measured on a stored energy test device during the exposure and cooling stages. The study assessed thermal protective performance by comparing the cooling methods, noting the time to second-degree burns and the energy released to the skin. Results. The SCM showed the best thermal protective performance, followed by the FCM, NCM and WSCM. No skin burns were observed with the SCM. Compared to the NCM, the FCM extended the time to second-degree burns by 3.2% (F1 fabric system) and 10.7% (F2 fabric system). The SCM had the lowest accumulated energy released to the skin and the highest cooling efficiency. The accumulated stored energy and released energy of the FCM decreased with increasing wind speed, whereas the values for the WSCM increased with longer water spray durations. These results can guide the development of optimal cooling methods to enhance firefighter safety and protection.

消防员热暴露后穿着防护服的冷却方法和效率的调查。
目标。本研究旨在评估四种冷却方法(自然冷却法[NCM]、剥离冷却法[SCM]、风扇冷却法[FCM]和喷水冷却法[WSCM])对减少消防员热暴露后热应激和皮肤烧伤的效果。方法。在一个储能测试装置上测量了暴露和冷却阶段的皮肤热流和织物温度。该研究通过比较冷却方法来评估热防护性能,注意到二度烧伤的时间和释放到皮肤的能量。结果。SCM的热防护性能最好,其次是FCM、NCM和WSCM。SCM未观察到皮肤烧伤。与NCM相比,FCM将二度烧伤时间延长了3.2% (F1织物体系)和10.7% (F2织物体系)。单片机有最低的累积能量释放到皮肤和最高的冷却效率。FCM累积蓄能和释放能随风速的增大而减小,而WSCM累积蓄能和释放能随喷水时间的延长而增大。这些结果可以指导最佳冷却方法的开发,以提高消防员的安全和保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
152
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信