The impact of DaVinci simulator competitions on medical student interest in robotic surgery.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Anthony K Nwankwo, Shaina W Twardus, Abigail R Dupre, Anirudha S Chandrabhatla, Zuhayr Shaikh, Moritz J Lange, Noah S Schenkman
{"title":"The impact of DaVinci simulator competitions on medical student interest in robotic surgery.","authors":"Anthony K Nwankwo, Shaina W Twardus, Abigail R Dupre, Anirudha S Chandrabhatla, Zuhayr Shaikh, Moritz J Lange, Noah S Schenkman","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02240-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robotic surgery has expanded significantly over the last decade. To help train learners, many institutions have implemented various training methods. Studies have shown that simulation training is an effective tool to develop skills for both residents and attending physicians. However, its influence on medical student training is unclear. Medical students were asked to compete in a 4-month da Vinci robotic console simulation tournament. Participants were given unlimited attempts to achieve the highest score possible on four different modules. Questionnaires were completed before and after the tournament to assess baseline demographics, surgical confidence, and perceptions toward robotic surgery. Performance data from the simulator was collected for each participant. A total of 12 medical students completed the tournament. Paired T-test analysis of pre-survey and post-survey questionnaires demonstrated significant increases in reported interest in robotic surgery (p < 0.001) and surgery overall (p = 0.0028). Self-reported surgical confidence using the simulator also increased significantly (p = 0.0043). There was an increase in overall performance across all modules when comparing first and last attempts (p < 0.001), (p < 0.001), (p = 0.0031), and (p = 0.011). Spearman's rank correlation analyses showed an association between overall performance and number of attempts for two of four modules (p = 0.0063) and (p = 0.046). Tournament-style simulation training increased medical students' surgical skill dexterity, confidence and interest in robotic surgery. Additional research with larger sample sizes are necessary to fully characterize the effectiveness of robotic surgical training for medical students.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"94"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02240-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Robotic surgery has expanded significantly over the last decade. To help train learners, many institutions have implemented various training methods. Studies have shown that simulation training is an effective tool to develop skills for both residents and attending physicians. However, its influence on medical student training is unclear. Medical students were asked to compete in a 4-month da Vinci robotic console simulation tournament. Participants were given unlimited attempts to achieve the highest score possible on four different modules. Questionnaires were completed before and after the tournament to assess baseline demographics, surgical confidence, and perceptions toward robotic surgery. Performance data from the simulator was collected for each participant. A total of 12 medical students completed the tournament. Paired T-test analysis of pre-survey and post-survey questionnaires demonstrated significant increases in reported interest in robotic surgery (p < 0.001) and surgery overall (p = 0.0028). Self-reported surgical confidence using the simulator also increased significantly (p = 0.0043). There was an increase in overall performance across all modules when comparing first and last attempts (p < 0.001), (p < 0.001), (p = 0.0031), and (p = 0.011). Spearman's rank correlation analyses showed an association between overall performance and number of attempts for two of four modules (p = 0.0063) and (p = 0.046). Tournament-style simulation training increased medical students' surgical skill dexterity, confidence and interest in robotic surgery. Additional research with larger sample sizes are necessary to fully characterize the effectiveness of robotic surgical training for medical students.

达芬奇模拟器竞赛对医学生对机器人手术兴趣的影响。
机器人手术在过去十年中得到了显著的发展。为了帮助培训学习者,许多机构实施了各种培训方法。研究表明,模拟训练是培养住院医生和主治医生技能的有效工具。然而,它对医学生培养的影响尚不清楚。医学院学生被要求参加为期4个月的达芬奇机器人控制台模拟比赛。参与者可以无限制地尝试在四个不同的模块中获得尽可能高的分数。调查问卷在比赛前后完成,以评估基线人口统计、手术信心和对机器人手术的看法。从模拟器中收集每个参与者的性能数据。共有12名医科学生完成了比赛。对调查前问卷和调查后问卷的配对t检验分析显示,报告中对机器人手术的兴趣显著增加(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信