Category-specific effects of high-level relations in visual search.

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Nicolas Goupil, Daniel Kaiser, Liuba Papeo
{"title":"Category-specific effects of high-level relations in visual search.","authors":"Nicolas Goupil, Daniel Kaiser, Liuba Papeo","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent empirical findings demonstrate that, in visual search for a target in an array of distractors, observers exploit information about object relations to increase search efficiency. We investigated how people searched for interacting people in a crowd, and how the eccentricity of the target affected this search (Experiments 1-3). Participants briefly viewed crowded arrays and had to search for an interacting dyad (two bodies face-to-face) among noninteracting dyads (back-to-back distractors), or vice versa, with the target presented in the attended central location or at a peripheral location. With central targets, we found a search asymmetry, whereby interacting people among noninteracting people were detected better than noninteracting people among interacting people. With peripheral targets, the advantage disappeared, or even tended to reverse in favor of noninteracting dyads. In Experiments 4-5, we asked whether the search asymmetry generalized to object pairs whose spatial relations did or did not form a functionally interacting set (a computer screen above a keyboard vs. a computer screen below a keyboard). We found no advantage for interacting over noninteracting sets either in central or peripheral locations for objects, but, if anything, evidence for the opposite effect. Thus, the effect of relational information on visual search is contingent on both stimulus category and attentional focus: The presentation of social interaction-but not of nonsocial interaction-at the attended (central) location readily captures an individual's attention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"696-709"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001300","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent empirical findings demonstrate that, in visual search for a target in an array of distractors, observers exploit information about object relations to increase search efficiency. We investigated how people searched for interacting people in a crowd, and how the eccentricity of the target affected this search (Experiments 1-3). Participants briefly viewed crowded arrays and had to search for an interacting dyad (two bodies face-to-face) among noninteracting dyads (back-to-back distractors), or vice versa, with the target presented in the attended central location or at a peripheral location. With central targets, we found a search asymmetry, whereby interacting people among noninteracting people were detected better than noninteracting people among interacting people. With peripheral targets, the advantage disappeared, or even tended to reverse in favor of noninteracting dyads. In Experiments 4-5, we asked whether the search asymmetry generalized to object pairs whose spatial relations did or did not form a functionally interacting set (a computer screen above a keyboard vs. a computer screen below a keyboard). We found no advantage for interacting over noninteracting sets either in central or peripheral locations for objects, but, if anything, evidence for the opposite effect. Thus, the effect of relational information on visual search is contingent on both stimulus category and attentional focus: The presentation of social interaction-but not of nonsocial interaction-at the attended (central) location readily captures an individual's attention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

视觉搜索中高层次关系的类别特定效应。
最近的实证研究结果表明,在视觉搜索目标的干扰阵列,观察者利用信息的对象关系,以提高搜索效率。我们调查了人们如何在人群中搜索互动的人,以及目标的怪癖如何影响这种搜索(实验1-3)。参与者短暂地观看了拥挤的阵列,并必须在非相互作用的二对(背靠背的干扰物)中寻找相互作用的二对(两个身体面对面),反之亦然,目标出现在参与的中心位置或外围位置。对于中心目标,我们发现了一种搜索不对称,即在不互动的人群中,互动的人比在互动的人群中,不互动的人更容易被发现。对于外围目标,这种优势消失了,甚至倾向于逆转,有利于不相互作用的二联体。在实验4-5中,我们询问搜索不对称是否推广到空间关系是否形成功能交互集的对象对(键盘上方的计算机屏幕与键盘下方的计算机屏幕)。我们发现,无论是在物体的中心位置还是外围位置,相互作用的集合都没有比非相互作用的集合更有优势,但是,如果有的话,有证据表明相反的效果。因此,关系信息对视觉搜索的影响取决于刺激类别和注意焦点:社会互动的呈现——而非社会互动——在被注意的(中心)位置很容易吸引个体的注意力。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
145
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance publishes studies on perception, control of action, perceptual aspects of language processing, and related cognitive processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信