Assessing the Understandability and Actionability of Education Materials for Agricultural Workers' Health.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Julianna Nieuwsma, Joseph G L Lee, Jamie E Bloss, Catherine E LePrevost, Israel M Mendez, Emery L Harwell, Leslie E Cofie
{"title":"Assessing the Understandability and Actionability of Education Materials for Agricultural Workers' Health.","authors":"Julianna Nieuwsma, Joseph G L Lee, Jamie E Bloss, Catherine E LePrevost, Israel M Mendez, Emery L Harwell, Leslie E Cofie","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2025.2474130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Agricultural health and safety educators, including community health workers and Extension agents, represent an important community of practice, connecting agricultural workers (i.e. migrant and seasonal farmworkers) to health information and care. We sought to identify and evaluate existing education resources available to educators for use in health education and outreach with farmworkers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a systemized search process to identify health education materials in English and Spanish used in the United States. Two independent coders coded each material for its understandability and actionability using the Patient Educational Material Assessment Tool (PEMAT). We report descriptive statistics by type of material, topic, and publication date of the material.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified farmworker health education materials (<i>n</i> = 602) from across the United States. The average understandability score was 86%, and the average actionability score was 76%. Materials were most commonly print material in the format of handouts, brochures, and posters. Some topic areas (e.g. musculoskeletal injuries) had considerably more resources than others (e.g. green tobacco).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research represents the first, to our knowledge, comprehensive assessment of health education materials for education and outreach to agricultural workers. While the average scores for understandability and actionability were high among materials, there is room to build a stronger set of resources in some topic areas and to modernize materials for electronic delivery. Using PEMAT tools can help the Extension and community health worker communities of practice improve the quality of materials they share with agricultural workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agromedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2025.2474130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Agricultural health and safety educators, including community health workers and Extension agents, represent an important community of practice, connecting agricultural workers (i.e. migrant and seasonal farmworkers) to health information and care. We sought to identify and evaluate existing education resources available to educators for use in health education and outreach with farmworkers.

Methods: This study used a systemized search process to identify health education materials in English and Spanish used in the United States. Two independent coders coded each material for its understandability and actionability using the Patient Educational Material Assessment Tool (PEMAT). We report descriptive statistics by type of material, topic, and publication date of the material.

Results: We identified farmworker health education materials (n = 602) from across the United States. The average understandability score was 86%, and the average actionability score was 76%. Materials were most commonly print material in the format of handouts, brochures, and posters. Some topic areas (e.g. musculoskeletal injuries) had considerably more resources than others (e.g. green tobacco).

Conclusion: This research represents the first, to our knowledge, comprehensive assessment of health education materials for education and outreach to agricultural workers. While the average scores for understandability and actionability were high among materials, there is room to build a stronger set of resources in some topic areas and to modernize materials for electronic delivery. Using PEMAT tools can help the Extension and community health worker communities of practice improve the quality of materials they share with agricultural workers.

农业工人健康教材的可理解性和可操作性评估。
目标:农业卫生和安全教育工作者,包括社区卫生工作者和推广人员,代表着一个重要的实践群体,将农业工人(即移徙工人和季节性农场工人)与卫生信息和保健联系起来。我们试图确定和评估现有的教育资源,以供教育工作者用于健康教育和与农场工人的外展。方法:本研究采用系统化的检索过程来识别在美国使用的英语和西班牙语健康教育材料。两名独立的编码员使用患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT)对每个材料进行编码,以确保其可理解性和可操作性。我们按材料类型、主题和材料出版日期报告描述性统计数据。结果:我们确定了来自美国各地的农场工人健康教育材料(n = 602)。可理解性平均得分为86%,可操作性平均得分为76%。材料通常是讲义、小册子和海报等形式的印刷材料。一些专题领域(如肌肉骨骼损伤)比其他专题领域(如绿色烟草)拥有更多的资源。结论:据我们所知,本研究首次对健康教育材料在农业工人教育和推广中的应用进行了全面评价。虽然材料中可理解性和可操作性的平均得分很高,但在某些主题领域仍有空间建立更强大的资源集,并使材料现代化以实现电子交付。使用PEMAT工具可以帮助推广和社区卫生工作者实践社区提高他们与农业工人共享的材料的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Agromedicine
Journal of Agromedicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
20.80%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agromedicine: Practice, Policy, and Research publishes translational research, reports and editorials related to agricultural health, safety and medicine. The Journal of Agromedicine seeks to engage the global agricultural health and safety community including rural health care providers, agricultural health and safety practitioners, academic researchers, government agencies, policy makers, and others. The Journal of Agromedicine is committed to providing its readers with relevant, rigorously peer-reviewed, original articles. The journal welcomes high quality submissions as they relate to agricultural health and safety in the areas of: • Behavioral and Mental Health • Climate Change • Education/Training • Emerging Practices • Environmental Public Health • Epidemiology • Ergonomics • Injury Prevention • Occupational and Industrial Health • Pesticides • Policy • Safety Interventions and Evaluation • Technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信