A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Negative Patient Experiences in Emergency Department Care: Identifying Challenges and Evidence-Informed Strategies Across the Care Continuum.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2025-03-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735251323795
J K Fujioka, M Walker, D Rajab, S A Bartels
{"title":"A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Negative Patient Experiences in Emergency Department Care: Identifying Challenges and Evidence-Informed Strategies Across the Care Continuum.","authors":"J K Fujioka, M Walker, D Rajab, S A Bartels","doi":"10.1177/23743735251323795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This mixed-methods study explores negative patient experiences within emergency departments (EDs), aiming to uncover systemic challenges and propose evidence-informed solutions. Of 2114 shared ED experiences, 306 (14.5%) were reported as \"bad\" or \"very bad.\" Younger age, Indigenous status, financial instability, mental health disabilities, and non-heteronormative sexual identities were associated with negative ED experiences. Our research highlights key issues across the ED care continuum. During triage and registration, patients felt judged and perceived that their health concerns were under prioritized. Prolonged wait times contributed to feelings of neglect. During assessments, privacy concerns and lack of communication were prominent. Perceptions of misdiagnosis and stigmatization emerged as major concerns during the diagnosis and treatment phases. At discharge, insufficient follow-up and unclear instructions were frequently reported. Our findings underscore the need for improved communication, enhanced training to reduce stigma, and multi-pronged strategies to address the root causes of patient dissatisfaction. These insights can guide healthcare practitioners and policymakers in fostering a more inclusive and supportive ED environment, ultimately improving patient experiences and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"12 ","pages":"23743735251323795"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11873856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735251323795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This mixed-methods study explores negative patient experiences within emergency departments (EDs), aiming to uncover systemic challenges and propose evidence-informed solutions. Of 2114 shared ED experiences, 306 (14.5%) were reported as "bad" or "very bad." Younger age, Indigenous status, financial instability, mental health disabilities, and non-heteronormative sexual identities were associated with negative ED experiences. Our research highlights key issues across the ED care continuum. During triage and registration, patients felt judged and perceived that their health concerns were under prioritized. Prolonged wait times contributed to feelings of neglect. During assessments, privacy concerns and lack of communication were prominent. Perceptions of misdiagnosis and stigmatization emerged as major concerns during the diagnosis and treatment phases. At discharge, insufficient follow-up and unclear instructions were frequently reported. Our findings underscore the need for improved communication, enhanced training to reduce stigma, and multi-pronged strategies to address the root causes of patient dissatisfaction. These insights can guide healthcare practitioners and policymakers in fostering a more inclusive and supportive ED environment, ultimately improving patient experiences and outcomes.

这项混合方法研究探讨了急诊科(ED)内患者的负面经历,旨在揭示系统性挑战并提出循证解决方案。在 2114 次共同的急诊室经历中,有 306 次(14.5%)被报告为 "糟糕 "或 "非常糟糕"。年龄较小、原住民身份、经济不稳定、精神健康残疾和非异性恋性身份与负面 ED 经历有关。我们的研究强调了急诊室护理过程中的关键问题。在分诊和登记过程中,患者感到自己受到了评判,认为自己的健康问题没有得到优先考虑。等待时间过长使患者感到被忽视。在评估过程中,隐私问题和缺乏沟通是突出问题。在诊断和治疗阶段,对误诊和污名化的看法成为主要问题。在出院时,经常有报告称随访不足和指示不明确。我们的研究结果表明,有必要改善沟通、加强培训以减少污名化,并采取多管齐下的策略来解决患者不满的根本原因。这些见解可以指导医疗从业人员和政策制定者营造一个更具包容性和支持性的急诊室环境,最终改善患者的就医体验和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信