Self-perception and clinical presentation of eating and swallowing difficulties within elderly care.

IF 1 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Caitlin S Bell, Esedra Krüger, Rouxjeanne Vermeulen, Andries Masenge, Bhavani S Pillay
{"title":"Self-perception and clinical presentation of eating and swallowing difficulties within elderly care.","authors":"Caitlin S Bell, Esedra Krüger, Rouxjeanne Vermeulen, Andries Masenge, Bhavani S Pillay","doi":"10.4102/sajcd.v72i1.1078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The growing ageing population requires effective management of complex medical diagnoses and healthy ageing support within residential care facilities. However, limited access to guidelines on monitoring residents' eating and swallowing abilities has been reported. Recent research is critical for future policy development.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> This study aimed to compare self-perceived and clinical presentation of eating and swallowing abilities among a portion of elderly residents to enhance management of the residential care population within the South African context.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong> This comparative, within-subject research study assessed 44 participants using an oropharyngeal dysphagia protocol including a medical history review, the Eating Assessment Tool - 10 (EAT-10), the Mann Assessment of Swallowing Abilities (MASA), and the three-ounce water test of the Yale Swallow Protocol (YSP). A brief cognitive screener was used when cognitive impairment was unknown.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Of the participants, 21 out of 44 (48%) self-reported concerns for oropharyngeal dysphagia. Evidence of compensatory eating behaviours, without therapeutic intervention, was found. A negative, low correlation was present between the EAT-10 and the MASA (r = -0.306, p  0.05) scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Individuals who self-reported eating and swallowing difficulties demonstrated fewer clinical symptoms, potentially due to compensatory techniques. The disparity between patient-reported outcome measures and clinical assessment tools highlights the need for robust screening and assessment policies within this context.Contribution: This study highlights the importance of holistic assessment practices by integrating self-perception with clinical findings to address oropharyngeal dysphagia incidence within this complex population.</p>","PeriodicalId":44003,"journal":{"name":"SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS","volume":"72 1","pages":"e1-e6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966656/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajcd.v72i1.1078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  The growing ageing population requires effective management of complex medical diagnoses and healthy ageing support within residential care facilities. However, limited access to guidelines on monitoring residents' eating and swallowing abilities has been reported. Recent research is critical for future policy development.

Objectives:  This study aimed to compare self-perceived and clinical presentation of eating and swallowing abilities among a portion of elderly residents to enhance management of the residential care population within the South African context.

Method:  This comparative, within-subject research study assessed 44 participants using an oropharyngeal dysphagia protocol including a medical history review, the Eating Assessment Tool - 10 (EAT-10), the Mann Assessment of Swallowing Abilities (MASA), and the three-ounce water test of the Yale Swallow Protocol (YSP). A brief cognitive screener was used when cognitive impairment was unknown.

Results:  Of the participants, 21 out of 44 (48%) self-reported concerns for oropharyngeal dysphagia. Evidence of compensatory eating behaviours, without therapeutic intervention, was found. A negative, low correlation was present between the EAT-10 and the MASA (r = -0.306, p  0.05) scores.

Conclusion:  Individuals who self-reported eating and swallowing difficulties demonstrated fewer clinical symptoms, potentially due to compensatory techniques. The disparity between patient-reported outcome measures and clinical assessment tools highlights the need for robust screening and assessment policies within this context.Contribution: This study highlights the importance of holistic assessment practices by integrating self-perception with clinical findings to address oropharyngeal dysphagia incidence within this complex population.

老年人护理中进食和吞咽困难的自我认知和临床表现。
背景:日益增长的老龄化人口需要有效的管理复杂的医疗诊断和健康的老龄化支持在住宅护理设施。然而,据报道,关于监测居民饮食和吞咽能力的指导方针很少。最近的研究对未来的政策制定至关重要。目的:本研究旨在比较部分老年居民饮食和吞咽能力的自我感知和临床表现,以加强对南非住院护理人口的管理。方法:本研究采用口咽吞咽困难方案,包括病史回顾、进食评估工具-10 (EAT-10)、Mann吞咽能力评估(MASA)和耶鲁吞咽方案(YSP)的3盎司水测试,对44名参与者进行了比较研究。当认知障碍未知时,使用简短的认知筛查。结果:44名参与者中有21名(48%)自我报告有口咽吞咽困难。在没有治疗干预的情况下发现了代偿性饮食行为的证据。EAT-10评分与MASA评分呈负相关(r = -0.306, p 0.05)。结论:自我报告进食和吞咽困难的个体表现出较少的临床症状,可能是由于代偿技术。患者报告的结果测量和临床评估工具之间的差异突出了在此背景下强有力的筛查和评估政策的必要性。贡献:本研究强调了通过将自我认知与临床结果相结合来解决这一复杂人群中口咽吞咽困难发生率的整体评估实践的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
36.40%
发文量
37
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信