A hole in the bucket? exploring England's retention rates of recently qualified GPs.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
William L Palmer, Lucina Rolewicz, Victoria Tzortziou Brown, Giuliano Russo
{"title":"A hole in the bucket? exploring England's retention rates of recently qualified GPs.","authors":"William L Palmer, Lucina Rolewicz, Victoria Tzortziou Brown, Giuliano Russo","doi":"10.1186/s12960-025-00980-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the senior medics within primary care services, general practitioners (GPs) have a pivotal role within the National Health Service (NHS). Despite several commitments made by government to increase the number of GPs in England, the level has consistently fallen. Much attention has been paid to recruitment of trainee GPs and overall retention, whereas this study sought to examine the specific transition from ending training to joining the NHS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study used aggregated, published administrative data to examine rates at which 14,302 doctors leaving their third year of specialty training (GP ST3s) became fully qualified GPs in NHS practices between 2018 and 2023. We separately analysed average levels of part-time working of those joining the NHS from 21,293 fully qualified joiners in England between 2017 and 2023. We calculated joiner and participation rates and used generalised linear mixed-effects models to explore possible demographic, period and cohort effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of those doctors leaving their third year of training since 2018, around a third (34.3%) were recorded as having taken up a fully qualified GP role in NHS general practices 6 months after finishing training, rising to 47.5% within 1 year, and 62.2% within 2 years. Average estimated participation rates of joiners seemed to remain consistent at about 65-69% of a full-time contract between 2017 and 2023. Joiner rates were lower for doctors with a primary medical qualification from outside the UK and, over a 2-year timeframe, both UK and non-UK trained male GP ST3s. Our statistical modelling suggests that there is a significant 'period effect' in connection to the recent Covid-19 pandemic, with apparent differences in the likelihood of GP ST3s joining the NHS in a fully qualified role at certain points in time, and an effect among some cohorts, with doctors who left specialty training in specific periods having significantly different joiner rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The GP pipeline is expanding, but we find no evidence that retention of newly trained GPs is improving. We discuss possible factors for such attrition, from barriers to hiring new doctors, to their diminishing interest in joining the NHS. The data do not capture all destinations of GP ST3s, and more work is needed to further explore the changing career behaviours of subsequent cohorts and demographics of doctors completing GP training.</p>","PeriodicalId":39823,"journal":{"name":"Human Resources for Health","volume":"23 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11874689/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resources for Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-025-00980-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As the senior medics within primary care services, general practitioners (GPs) have a pivotal role within the National Health Service (NHS). Despite several commitments made by government to increase the number of GPs in England, the level has consistently fallen. Much attention has been paid to recruitment of trainee GPs and overall retention, whereas this study sought to examine the specific transition from ending training to joining the NHS.

Methods: The study used aggregated, published administrative data to examine rates at which 14,302 doctors leaving their third year of specialty training (GP ST3s) became fully qualified GPs in NHS practices between 2018 and 2023. We separately analysed average levels of part-time working of those joining the NHS from 21,293 fully qualified joiners in England between 2017 and 2023. We calculated joiner and participation rates and used generalised linear mixed-effects models to explore possible demographic, period and cohort effects.

Results: Of those doctors leaving their third year of training since 2018, around a third (34.3%) were recorded as having taken up a fully qualified GP role in NHS general practices 6 months after finishing training, rising to 47.5% within 1 year, and 62.2% within 2 years. Average estimated participation rates of joiners seemed to remain consistent at about 65-69% of a full-time contract between 2017 and 2023. Joiner rates were lower for doctors with a primary medical qualification from outside the UK and, over a 2-year timeframe, both UK and non-UK trained male GP ST3s. Our statistical modelling suggests that there is a significant 'period effect' in connection to the recent Covid-19 pandemic, with apparent differences in the likelihood of GP ST3s joining the NHS in a fully qualified role at certain points in time, and an effect among some cohorts, with doctors who left specialty training in specific periods having significantly different joiner rates.

Conclusion: The GP pipeline is expanding, but we find no evidence that retention of newly trained GPs is improving. We discuss possible factors for such attrition, from barriers to hiring new doctors, to their diminishing interest in joining the NHS. The data do not capture all destinations of GP ST3s, and more work is needed to further explore the changing career behaviours of subsequent cohorts and demographics of doctors completing GP training.

桶上有个洞?探究英格兰新近合格的全科医生的保留率。
背景:作为初级保健服务的高级医生,全科医生(全科医生)在国家卫生服务(NHS)中起着举足轻重的作用。尽管英国政府多次承诺增加全科医生的数量,但这一水平一直在下降。很多人都注意到实习全科医生的招聘和整体保留,而本研究试图检查从结束培训到加入NHS的具体过渡。方法:该研究使用汇总的、已发表的行政数据来检查2018年至2023年期间14,302名医生离开第三年专业培训(GP ST3s)成为NHS实践中完全合格的全科医生的比率。我们分别分析了2017年至2023年间英国21293名完全合格的加入者加入NHS的平均兼职水平。我们计算了加入率和参与率,并使用广义线性混合效应模型来探索可能的人口统计学、时期和队列效应。结果:在自2018年以来完成第三年培训的医生中,约有三分之一(34.3%)的人在完成培训后6个月在NHS全科医生中担任了完全合格的全科医生角色,一年内上升到47.5%,两年内上升到62.2%。2017年至2023年期间,新员工的平均参与率似乎保持稳定,约为全职合同的65-69%。在英国以外拥有初级医疗资格的医生,以及在2年的时间框架内,英国和非英国培训的男性全科医生st3的加入率较低。我们的统计模型表明,与最近的Covid-19大流行有关,存在显著的“时期效应”,GP st3在某些时间点以完全合格的角色加入NHS的可能性存在明显差异,并且在一些队列中存在影响,在特定时期离开专业培训的医生的加入率显着不同。结论:全科医生队伍正在扩大,但我们发现没有证据表明新培训的全科医生的保留率有所提高。我们讨论了这种流失的可能因素,从聘请新医生的障碍,到他们加入NHS的兴趣减弱。这些数据并没有涵盖全科医生st3的所有目的地,需要更多的工作来进一步探索后续队列和完成全科医生培训的医生的人口统计数据的职业行为变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Resources for Health
Human Resources for Health Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
102
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Resources for Health is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal covering all aspects of planning, producing and managing the health workforce - all those who provide health services worldwide. Human Resources for Health aims to disseminate research on health workforce policy, the health labour market, health workforce practice, development of knowledge tools and implementation mechanisms nationally and internationally; as well as specific features of the health workforce, such as the impact of management of health workers" performance and its link with health outcomes. The journal encourages debate on health sector reforms and their link with human resources issues, a hitherto-neglected area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信