Inflexible responses to uncertainty: The mediating role of psychological inflexibility in the link between intolerance of uncertainty, traumatic stress, and somatic symptoms.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Chung Xiann Lim, Emily A Mueller, L Brooke Short, Rong Xia, Piraorn Suvanbenjakule, William H O'Brien
{"title":"Inflexible responses to uncertainty: The mediating role of psychological inflexibility in the link between intolerance of uncertainty, traumatic stress, and somatic symptoms.","authors":"Chung Xiann Lim, Emily A Mueller, L Brooke Short, Rong Xia, Piraorn Suvanbenjakule, William H O'Brien","doi":"10.1037/tra0001860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) and psychological inflexibility (PI) were shown to be risk factors of traumatic stress (TS) and somatic symptoms (SS) during COVID-19. The present study tested a structural equation model where PI mediated the relationships between IU, TS, and SS based on their theoretical and experimental overlaps. The contribution of all six PI facets including experiential avoidance (EA) and cognitive fusion (CF) were investigated.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The sample was made up of 656 participants who reported elevated scores for TS and SS. Mediation analysis was conducted via structural equation modeling to test the proposed model. A sensitivity analysis followed the mediation analysis. Follow-up hierarchical regressions were conducted to examine the individual contribution of each PI facet.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall model demonstrated a good fit (comparative fit index = .98; root-mean-square error of approximation = .07; total effects on TS and SS: β = .78, β = .60). IU was positively associated with TS and SS, and the relations were mediated by PI, with PI accounting for most of the effect. Hierarchical analyses revealed the less studied PI facets explained additional variance over and beyond EA and CF. EA and CF were no longer significant predictors of TS and SS after all PI facets were entered while controlling for IU and demographic variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings were consistent with previous researchers positing PI as an overarching construct encompassing IU and other related psychological vulnerabilities. PI facets beyond EA and CF warrant more investigations. Clinically, PI and PI facets could be important intervention targets for high IU individuals in times of uncertainty. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001860","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) and psychological inflexibility (PI) were shown to be risk factors of traumatic stress (TS) and somatic symptoms (SS) during COVID-19. The present study tested a structural equation model where PI mediated the relationships between IU, TS, and SS based on their theoretical and experimental overlaps. The contribution of all six PI facets including experiential avoidance (EA) and cognitive fusion (CF) were investigated.

Method: The sample was made up of 656 participants who reported elevated scores for TS and SS. Mediation analysis was conducted via structural equation modeling to test the proposed model. A sensitivity analysis followed the mediation analysis. Follow-up hierarchical regressions were conducted to examine the individual contribution of each PI facet.

Results: The overall model demonstrated a good fit (comparative fit index = .98; root-mean-square error of approximation = .07; total effects on TS and SS: β = .78, β = .60). IU was positively associated with TS and SS, and the relations were mediated by PI, with PI accounting for most of the effect. Hierarchical analyses revealed the less studied PI facets explained additional variance over and beyond EA and CF. EA and CF were no longer significant predictors of TS and SS after all PI facets were entered while controlling for IU and demographic variables.

Conclusions: The findings were consistent with previous researchers positing PI as an overarching construct encompassing IU and other related psychological vulnerabilities. PI facets beyond EA and CF warrant more investigations. Clinically, PI and PI facets could be important intervention targets for high IU individuals in times of uncertainty. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

对不确定性的不灵活反应:心理不灵活性在不确定性不容忍、创伤性压力和躯体症状之间的联系中的中介作用。
目的:不确定性不耐受(IU)和心理不灵活性(PI)是新冠肺炎患者创伤应激(TS)和躯体症状(SS)的危险因素。本研究测试了一个结构方程模型,其中PI介导了基于理论和实验重叠的IU, TS和SS之间的关系。研究了包括经验回避(EA)和认知融合(CF)在内的所有PI方面的贡献。方法:以656名报告TS和SS得分较高的参与者为样本,通过结构方程模型进行中介分析,对所提出的模型进行检验。在进行中介分析后进行敏感性分析。随后进行了分层回归,以检查每个PI关节面的个体贡献。结果:模型整体拟合良好(比较拟合指数= 0.98;近似均方根误差= .07;对TS和SS的总影响:β = 0.78, β = 0.60)。IU与TS、SS呈显著正相关,且由PI介导,其中PI的作用最大。层次分析显示,研究较少的PI方面解释了EA和CF之外的额外方差。在控制IU和人口变量的情况下,所有PI方面都被输入后,EA和CF不再是TS和SS的显著预测因子。结论:该研究结果与先前研究人员的假设一致,即PI是一个涵盖IU和其他相关心理脆弱性的总体结构。EA和CF之外的PI方面需要更多的研究。在临床上,PI和PI方面可能是高IU个体在不确定时期的重要干预目标。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
427
期刊介绍: Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy. The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including: -Psychological treatments and effects -Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma -Assessment and diagnosis of trauma -Pathophysiology of trauma reactions -Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations) -Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies -Neuroimaging studies -Trauma and cultural competence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信