Does Size Matter? A Retrospective Study Analysing the Size of PI-RADS 4 Lesions and Its Associated Prostate Cancer Positivity with Transperineal Prostate Biopsy.

IF 2.7 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Research and Reports in Urology Pub Date : 2025-02-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RRU.S499930
Ali Hooshyari, David Scholtz, Keu Maoate, Samuel Robertson, Lodewikus Petrus Vermeulen, Luiz Gustavo Modelli De Andrade, Paulo Roberto Kawano, Peter Gilling, Mark Fraundorfer, Flavio Vasconcelos Ordones
{"title":"Does Size Matter? A Retrospective Study Analysing the Size of PI-RADS 4 Lesions and Its Associated Prostate Cancer Positivity with Transperineal Prostate Biopsy.","authors":"Ali Hooshyari, David Scholtz, Keu Maoate, Samuel Robertson, Lodewikus Petrus Vermeulen, Luiz Gustavo Modelli De Andrade, Paulo Roberto Kawano, Peter Gilling, Mark Fraundorfer, Flavio Vasconcelos Ordones","doi":"10.2147/RRU.S499930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an essential tool in Prostate Cancer (PCa) diagnosis. PI-RADS v2.1 score correlates with clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) and according to the most recent guidelines, prevalence of CSPCa with PI-RADS 4 is 33-41%, while PI-RADS 5 is 62-79%. These groups are separated only by a size of 15 mm yet the difference in risk is significant. This study aims to find a size threshold associated with CSPCa within the PI-RADS 4 group, which may be used in combination with other prostatic parameters, such as PSA density in order to help with risk stratification and patient counselling in the pre-biopsy setting. This may also aid with surveillance of smaller PI-RADS 4 lesions in the setting of a negative biopsy and avoid unnecessary repeat biopsies unless triggered by a size threshold.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was performed with data from 407 patients undergoing transperineal prostate biopsy (TPPB) between April 2022 and November 2023. A subgroup of patients with PI-RADS 4 was included for analysis. A ROC-AUC was obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median age was 67 (interquartile range: 61-71) and PSA density 0.20 (interquartile range 0.13-0.28). PI-RADS score correlated with CSPCa: for PI-RADS 1 and 2, the frequency of CSPCa was 10%; for PI-RADS 3, it was 20%; for PI-RADS 4, it was 60%; and for PI-RADS 5, it was 80%, Pearson correlation = 0.51, p < 0.001. The Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC) was determined to be 0.664 [0.579-0.7499]. The optimal cut-off point was 8.5 mm. Patients with lesions larger than 8.5 mm had 2.31 times higher risk CSPCa.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PI-RADS 4 size does matter and is a useful predictor of CSPCa. In our study, a cut-off of 8.5 mm was identified. The combination of PI-RADS 4 with PSA density provides a specificity higher than 80% for CSPCa detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":21008,"journal":{"name":"Research and Reports in Urology","volume":"17 ","pages":"49-57"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871869/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Reports in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S499930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an essential tool in Prostate Cancer (PCa) diagnosis. PI-RADS v2.1 score correlates with clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) and according to the most recent guidelines, prevalence of CSPCa with PI-RADS 4 is 33-41%, while PI-RADS 5 is 62-79%. These groups are separated only by a size of 15 mm yet the difference in risk is significant. This study aims to find a size threshold associated with CSPCa within the PI-RADS 4 group, which may be used in combination with other prostatic parameters, such as PSA density in order to help with risk stratification and patient counselling in the pre-biopsy setting. This may also aid with surveillance of smaller PI-RADS 4 lesions in the setting of a negative biopsy and avoid unnecessary repeat biopsies unless triggered by a size threshold.

Methods: A retrospective study was performed with data from 407 patients undergoing transperineal prostate biopsy (TPPB) between April 2022 and November 2023. A subgroup of patients with PI-RADS 4 was included for analysis. A ROC-AUC was obtained.

Results: Median age was 67 (interquartile range: 61-71) and PSA density 0.20 (interquartile range 0.13-0.28). PI-RADS score correlated with CSPCa: for PI-RADS 1 and 2, the frequency of CSPCa was 10%; for PI-RADS 3, it was 20%; for PI-RADS 4, it was 60%; and for PI-RADS 5, it was 80%, Pearson correlation = 0.51, p < 0.001. The Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC) was determined to be 0.664 [0.579-0.7499]. The optimal cut-off point was 8.5 mm. Patients with lesions larger than 8.5 mm had 2.31 times higher risk CSPCa.

Conclusion: PI-RADS 4 size does matter and is a useful predictor of CSPCa. In our study, a cut-off of 8.5 mm was identified. The combination of PI-RADS 4 with PSA density provides a specificity higher than 80% for CSPCa detection.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

大小重要吗?一项通过经会阴前列腺活检分析 PI-RADS 4 病变大小及其相关前列腺癌阳性率的回顾性研究。
简介:磁共振成像(MRI)是诊断前列腺癌(PCa)的重要工具。PI-RADS v2.1评分与临床显著性前列腺癌(CSPCa)相关,根据最新的指南,CSPCa伴PI-RADS 4的患病率为33-41%,而PI-RADS 5的患病率为62-79%。这两组之间仅相隔15毫米,但风险差异很大。本研究旨在寻找PI-RADS 4组中与CSPCa相关的大小阈值,该阈值可与其他前列腺参数(如PSA密度)联合使用,以帮助在活检前进行风险分层和患者咨询。这也有助于在活检阴性的情况下监测较小的PI-RADS 4病变,避免不必要的重复活检,除非由大小阈值触发。方法:对2022年4月至2023年11月期间接受过经会阴前列腺活检(TPPB)的407例患者的数据进行回顾性研究。纳入PI-RADS 4患者亚组进行分析。得到ROC-AUC。结果:中位年龄为67岁(四分位数范围为61-71),PSA密度为0.20(四分位数范围为0.13-0.28)。PI-RADS评分与CSPCa相关:PI-RADS 1和2中,CSPCa发生率为10%;PI-RADS 3为20%;PI-RADS 4为60%;PI-RADS 5为80%,Pearson相关= 0.51,p < 0.001。测定受试者曲线下工作特征面积(ROC-AUC)为0.664[0.579-0.7499]。最佳分界点为8.5 mm。病变大于8.5 mm的患者患CSPCa的风险增加2.31倍。结论:pi - rads4大小对CSPCa有影响,是CSPCa的有效预测因子。在我们的研究中,确定了8.5 mm的截止。PI-RADS 4结合PSA密度检测CSPCa的特异性高于80%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research and Reports in Urology
Research and Reports in Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Research and Reports in Urology is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. Publishing original research, reports, editorials, reviews and commentaries on all aspects of adult and pediatric urology in the clinic and laboratory including the following topics: Pathology, pathophysiology of urological disease Investigation and treatment of urological disease Pharmacology of drugs used for the treatment of urological disease Although the main focus of the journal is to publish research and clinical results in humans; preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they will shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies. Issues of patient safety and quality of care will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信