[Comparison of side-opening and front-opening approach bone cement injectors in percutaneous kyphoplasty for thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures].

Q4 Medicine
Wei-Xin Dong, Zhen-Tao Chu, Yong Hu, Ou-Jie Lai, Zhen-Shan Yuan, Xiao-Yang Sun
{"title":"[Comparison of side-opening and front-opening approach bone cement injectors in percutaneous kyphoplasty for thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures].","authors":"Wei-Xin Dong, Zhen-Tao Chu, Yong Hu, Ou-Jie Lai, Zhen-Shan Yuan, Xiao-Yang Sun","doi":"10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20230284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare clinical efficacy between side-opening and front-opening bone cement injectors in percutaneous kyphoplasty(PKP) for the management of thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures(OVCFs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted, comprising 62 patients with single-segment thoracolumbar OVCFs (T<sub>11</sub>-L<sub>2</sub>), who underwent bilateral PKP at our department during the period from June 2020 to October 2021. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the specific bone cement injector employed during the surgical procedure: the side-opening group (<i>n</i>=29) and the front-opening group (<i>n</i>=33). Among them, the side-opening group consisted of 6 male and 23 female patients, with a mean age of (73.32±9.11) years. The front-opening group included 7 male and 26 female patients, with a mean age of (71.29±10.39) years. The variables encompassed essential patient characteristics were recorded, such as gender, age, bone mineral density (BMD), and fracture level (T<sub>11</sub>-L<sub>2</sub>), as well as procedural aspects, including operation duration, cement injection volume, cement distribution type (lobular or diffuse), occurrence of cement leakage, pre-and post-operative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, and vertebral compression ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients underwent successful surgery, with a mean follow-up duration of (15.37±3.03) months. There were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, BMD, fracture level, preoperative vertebral compression degree, and VAS scores between the side-opening group and the front-opening group (<i>P</i>>0.05). The operation time, the mean cement injection volumes, the distribution of bone cement within the vertebrae has no statistically significant difference between two groups(<i>P</i>>0.05). Both the side-opening and front-opening groups showed significant improvements in VAS scores at 3 days and 6 months after operation (<i>P</i><0.05). However, there was no significant difference in VAS scores between the two groups at both 3 days and 6 months after the operation (<i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Side-opening bone cement injectors in bilateral PKP surgery for single-segment thoracolumbar OVCF achieve similar clinical efficacy as front-opening injectors, without significant improvement in cement distribution and containment.</p>","PeriodicalId":23964,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","volume":"38 2","pages":"128-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20230284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare clinical efficacy between side-opening and front-opening bone cement injectors in percutaneous kyphoplasty(PKP) for the management of thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures(OVCFs).

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, comprising 62 patients with single-segment thoracolumbar OVCFs (T11-L2), who underwent bilateral PKP at our department during the period from June 2020 to October 2021. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the specific bone cement injector employed during the surgical procedure: the side-opening group (n=29) and the front-opening group (n=33). Among them, the side-opening group consisted of 6 male and 23 female patients, with a mean age of (73.32±9.11) years. The front-opening group included 7 male and 26 female patients, with a mean age of (71.29±10.39) years. The variables encompassed essential patient characteristics were recorded, such as gender, age, bone mineral density (BMD), and fracture level (T11-L2), as well as procedural aspects, including operation duration, cement injection volume, cement distribution type (lobular or diffuse), occurrence of cement leakage, pre-and post-operative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, and vertebral compression ratio.

Results: All patients underwent successful surgery, with a mean follow-up duration of (15.37±3.03) months. There were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, BMD, fracture level, preoperative vertebral compression degree, and VAS scores between the side-opening group and the front-opening group (P>0.05). The operation time, the mean cement injection volumes, the distribution of bone cement within the vertebrae has no statistically significant difference between two groups(P>0.05). Both the side-opening and front-opening groups showed significant improvements in VAS scores at 3 days and 6 months after operation (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in VAS scores between the two groups at both 3 days and 6 months after the operation (P>0.05).

Conclusion: Side-opening bone cement injectors in bilateral PKP surgery for single-segment thoracolumbar OVCF achieve similar clinical efficacy as front-opening injectors, without significant improvement in cement distribution and containment.

[经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗胸腰椎骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折中侧开法和前开法骨水泥注射器的比较]。
目的:比较侧开式和前开式骨水泥注入器经皮后凸成形术(PKP)治疗胸腰椎骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(ovcf)的临床疗效。方法:回顾性队列研究,纳入2020年6月至2021年10月在我科行双侧PKP的62例单节段胸腰椎OVCFs (T11-L2)患者。根据手术中使用的特定骨水泥注射器将患者分为两组:侧开组(n=29)和前开组(n=33)。其中侧开组男性6例,女性23例,平均年龄(73.32±9.11)岁。前开组男性7例,女性26例,平均年龄(71.29±10.39)岁。变量包括患者的基本特征,如性别、年龄、骨密度(BMD)和骨折水平(T11-L2),以及手术方面的变量,包括手术时间、水泥注射量、水泥分布类型(小叶或弥漫性)、水泥泄漏的发生、术前和术后视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分和椎体压缩比。结果:所有患者均手术成功,平均随访时间(15.37±3.03)个月。侧开组与前开组在性别、年龄、骨密度、骨折程度、术前椎体受压程度、VAS评分等方面差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组手术时间、平均骨水泥注射量、椎体内骨水泥分布差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。侧开组和前开组术后3 d和6个月VAS评分均有显著改善(p < 0.05)。结论:侧开骨水泥注射器用于双侧PKP手术治疗胸腰椎单节段OVCF的临床疗效与前开骨水泥注射器相似,但在骨水泥分布和封闭方面无明显改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
189
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信