Pharmacological agents for treatment of proliferative vitreoretinopathy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Sina Khosravi Mirzaei, Firouze Hatami, Sare Safi, Zahra Khorrami, Fatemeh Khosravi Shadmani, Seyed Mohamadmehdi Moshtaghion, Hamid Ahmadieh
{"title":"Pharmacological agents for treatment of proliferative vitreoretinopathy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Sina Khosravi Mirzaei, Firouze Hatami, Sare Safi, Zahra Khorrami, Fatemeh Khosravi Shadmani, Seyed Mohamadmehdi Moshtaghion, Hamid Ahmadieh","doi":"10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We performed a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to assess the efficacy of pharmacological agents for the treatment of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) following retinal detachment (RD) surgery. A systematic search was performed across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase. Randomized and non-randomized controlled trials and comparative observational studies evaluating the effect of pharmacological agents in a clinical setting were included. The primary outcome was retinal reattachment rate, and secondary outcomes were PVR recurrence, reoperation, intraocular pressure (IOP), epiretinal membrane (ERM), and macular edema. A total of 23 studies with 1749 eyes were included. Twelve different drugs or drug combinations were assessed. The NMA was performed for retinal reattachment, PVR recurrence, and reoperation rate outcomes. Among the pharmacological agents analyzed, adjunctive therapy with 13-cis-retinoic acid (13-cis-RA) demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in retinal reattachment rates (RR =1.36, 95%CI=1-1.84) and a reduction in reoperation rates (RR=0.23, 95% CI=0.07 -0.69) compared to the control group, while none of the other drugs had statistically significant results. Additionally, adjunctive therapy did not yield significant improvements in IOP, ERM, or macular edema, except for a reduction in macular edema associated with dexamethasone in one study. This systematic review and NMA indicate that most pharmacological agents could not significantly improve retinal reattachment, reduce PVR recurrence, or lower reoperation rates following RD surgery. 13-cis-RA was the only drug that showed a significant impact on lowering retinal detachment and reoperation rates. Further high-quality clinical trials are warranted to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":22102,"journal":{"name":"Survey of ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.02.005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We performed a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to assess the efficacy of pharmacological agents for the treatment of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) following retinal detachment (RD) surgery. A systematic search was performed across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase. Randomized and non-randomized controlled trials and comparative observational studies evaluating the effect of pharmacological agents in a clinical setting were included. The primary outcome was retinal reattachment rate, and secondary outcomes were PVR recurrence, reoperation, intraocular pressure (IOP), epiretinal membrane (ERM), and macular edema. A total of 23 studies with 1749 eyes were included. Twelve different drugs or drug combinations were assessed. The NMA was performed for retinal reattachment, PVR recurrence, and reoperation rate outcomes. Among the pharmacological agents analyzed, adjunctive therapy with 13-cis-retinoic acid (13-cis-RA) demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in retinal reattachment rates (RR =1.36, 95%CI=1-1.84) and a reduction in reoperation rates (RR=0.23, 95% CI=0.07 -0.69) compared to the control group, while none of the other drugs had statistically significant results. Additionally, adjunctive therapy did not yield significant improvements in IOP, ERM, or macular edema, except for a reduction in macular edema associated with dexamethasone in one study. This systematic review and NMA indicate that most pharmacological agents could not significantly improve retinal reattachment, reduce PVR recurrence, or lower reoperation rates following RD surgery. 13-cis-RA was the only drug that showed a significant impact on lowering retinal detachment and reoperation rates. Further high-quality clinical trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

我们进行了一项全面的系统综述和网络荟萃分析(NMA),以评估药物治疗视网膜脱离(RD)手术后增殖性玻璃体视网膜病变(PVR)的疗效。我们在 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Embase 中进行了系统性检索。研究纳入了随机和非随机对照试验,以及在临床环境中评估药理作用的对比观察研究。主要结果是视网膜再粘连率,次要结果是PVR复发、再次手术、眼压(IOP)、视网膜外膜(ERM)和黄斑水肿。共纳入 23 项研究,1749 只眼睛。评估了 12 种不同的药物或药物组合。对视网膜再粘连、PVR 复发和再手术率结果进行了 NMA 分析。在分析的药物中,与对照组相比,13-顺式维甲酸(13-cis-RA)的辅助治疗可显著改善视网膜再粘连率(RR=1.36,95%CI=1-1.84),降低再手术率(RR=0.23,95%CI=0.07-0.69),而其他药物均无显著的统计学结果。此外,除了在一项研究中地塞米松能减轻黄斑水肿外,其他辅助治疗对眼压、ERM 或黄斑水肿均无明显改善。本系统综述和 NMA 表明,大多数药物都不能显著改善视网膜再粘连、减少 PVR 复发或降低 RD 手术后的再手术率。13-cis-RA 是唯一一种对降低视网膜脱离率和再手术率有显著影响的药物。要证实这些发现,还需要进一步开展高质量的临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Survey of ophthalmology
Survey of ophthalmology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
138
审稿时长
14.8 weeks
期刊介绍: Survey of Ophthalmology is a clinically oriented review journal designed to keep ophthalmologists up to date. Comprehensive major review articles, written by experts and stringently refereed, integrate the literature on subjects selected for their clinical importance. Survey also includes feature articles, section reviews, book reviews, and abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信