{"title":"Lower lip changes after overjet reduction with and without mandibular incisor retraction.","authors":"Kulnipa Punyanirun, Chairat Charoemratrote","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.12.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Four (2 maxillary + 2 mandibular) premolar (4P) and 2 maxillary premolar (U4) extractions are commonly employed for Class II malocclusion with excessive overjet. Although upper lip changes have been widely investigated, lower lip changes remain unclear. The soft-tissue responses after maxillary and mandibular incisor movements in each protocol were investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 90 pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms were digitized and allocated to 3 groups (n = 30 each) according to the initial overjet and treatment: normal overjet with 4P (NJ-4P), excessive overjet with 4P (EJ-4P), and excessive overjet with U4 (EJ-U4). The cephalometric parameters were compared, and the lip-to-incisor change ratios (upper lip-maxillary incisor, lower lip-mandibular incisor, and lower lip-maxillary incisor) were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Soft-tissue parameters revealing significant changes among the groups included upper lip and lower lip positions, mentolabial area, and vermilion lip thickness. Significant differences were observed between NJ-4P/EJ-U4 for lower lip-mandibular incisor ratio and between NJ-4P/EJ-U4 and NJ-4P/EJ-4P for lower lip-maxillary incisor ratio but not for upper lip-maxillary incisor ratio.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reduction in upper lip protrusion was smaller, whereas that in lower lip protrusion was greater after maxillary incisor and mandibular incisor retraction, respectively, in patients with excessive overjet and skeletal Class II malocclusion undergoing the 4P extraction than in those with normal overjet. Moreover, a reduction in lower lip protrusion can be expected with minimal retraction of the mandibular incisors in patients undergoing U4 extraction. The potential impact of the maxillary incisors on the lower lip, especially in excessive overjet malocclusion, should be noted during clinical examination.</p>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.12.011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Four (2 maxillary + 2 mandibular) premolar (4P) and 2 maxillary premolar (U4) extractions are commonly employed for Class II malocclusion with excessive overjet. Although upper lip changes have been widely investigated, lower lip changes remain unclear. The soft-tissue responses after maxillary and mandibular incisor movements in each protocol were investigated.
Methods: A total of 90 pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms were digitized and allocated to 3 groups (n = 30 each) according to the initial overjet and treatment: normal overjet with 4P (NJ-4P), excessive overjet with 4P (EJ-4P), and excessive overjet with U4 (EJ-U4). The cephalometric parameters were compared, and the lip-to-incisor change ratios (upper lip-maxillary incisor, lower lip-mandibular incisor, and lower lip-maxillary incisor) were determined.
Results: Soft-tissue parameters revealing significant changes among the groups included upper lip and lower lip positions, mentolabial area, and vermilion lip thickness. Significant differences were observed between NJ-4P/EJ-U4 for lower lip-mandibular incisor ratio and between NJ-4P/EJ-U4 and NJ-4P/EJ-4P for lower lip-maxillary incisor ratio but not for upper lip-maxillary incisor ratio.
Conclusions: Reduction in upper lip protrusion was smaller, whereas that in lower lip protrusion was greater after maxillary incisor and mandibular incisor retraction, respectively, in patients with excessive overjet and skeletal Class II malocclusion undergoing the 4P extraction than in those with normal overjet. Moreover, a reduction in lower lip protrusion can be expected with minimal retraction of the mandibular incisors in patients undergoing U4 extraction. The potential impact of the maxillary incisors on the lower lip, especially in excessive overjet malocclusion, should be noted during clinical examination.
期刊介绍:
Published for more than 100 years, the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics remains the leading orthodontic resource. It is the official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, the American Board of Orthodontics, and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Orthodontics. Each month its readers have access to original peer-reviewed articles that examine all phases of orthodontic treatment. Illustrated throughout, the publication includes tables, color photographs, and statistical data. Coverage includes successful diagnostic procedures, imaging techniques, bracket and archwire materials, extraction and impaction concerns, orthognathic surgery, TMJ disorders, removable appliances, and adult therapy.