Impact of Antepartum Case-Based Learning on Glycemic Control and Self-Management Skills in Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Patient-Centered Non-Parallel Quasi-Experimental Study.
{"title":"Impact of Antepartum Case-Based Learning on Glycemic Control and Self-Management Skills in Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Patient-Centered Non-Parallel Quasi-Experimental Study.","authors":"Guifen Wen, Jinguo Zhai, Peixuan Wen, Fang Yang, Xiaoxia Xie","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S503359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a growing global concern. GDM increases the risk of complications in both mothers and infants, including preeclampsia, macrosomia, and a higher likelihood of developing type 2 diabetes later in life. This study aimed to assess whether integrating case-based learning (CBL) with traditional education could improve glycemic control and patient outcomes in women with GDM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This non-parallel quasi-experimental study compared CBL interventions with traditional education in GDM women. Pregnant women from September 2022 to March 2023 received only traditional education (control group), whereas those from April to September 2023 received both case-based and traditional education (intervention group). The primary outcomes included fasting and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose level changes after the intervention. The secondary outcomes included self-management behavior changes (Self-Management Scale for Women with GDM), self-efficacy (Pregnancy Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale), GDM understanding (self-developed questionnaire), satisfaction, pregnancy weight gain, and macrosomia incidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 140 GDM women were included, with the intervention and control groups containing 70 participants each. The intervention group showed significantly greater reductions in fasting and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose levels than the control group (<i>p</i><0.001). In addition, the intervention group demonstrated notable improvements in self-management behaviors, GDM knowledge, and patient satisfaction. The incidence of macrosomia was also significantly lower in the intervention group (1.6% vs 10.8%, <i>p</i>=0.034), indicating better neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CBL could be incorporated into traditional education in GDM women to improve their self-management and self-efficacy for better glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes. Healthcare providers should be educated on the CBL and relevant policies should be developed to facilitate the implementation of CBL in the clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"451-462"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11874955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S503359","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a growing global concern. GDM increases the risk of complications in both mothers and infants, including preeclampsia, macrosomia, and a higher likelihood of developing type 2 diabetes later in life. This study aimed to assess whether integrating case-based learning (CBL) with traditional education could improve glycemic control and patient outcomes in women with GDM.
Methods: This non-parallel quasi-experimental study compared CBL interventions with traditional education in GDM women. Pregnant women from September 2022 to March 2023 received only traditional education (control group), whereas those from April to September 2023 received both case-based and traditional education (intervention group). The primary outcomes included fasting and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose level changes after the intervention. The secondary outcomes included self-management behavior changes (Self-Management Scale for Women with GDM), self-efficacy (Pregnancy Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale), GDM understanding (self-developed questionnaire), satisfaction, pregnancy weight gain, and macrosomia incidence.
Results: A total of 140 GDM women were included, with the intervention and control groups containing 70 participants each. The intervention group showed significantly greater reductions in fasting and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose levels than the control group (p<0.001). In addition, the intervention group demonstrated notable improvements in self-management behaviors, GDM knowledge, and patient satisfaction. The incidence of macrosomia was also significantly lower in the intervention group (1.6% vs 10.8%, p=0.034), indicating better neonatal outcomes.
Conclusion: CBL could be incorporated into traditional education in GDM women to improve their self-management and self-efficacy for better glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes. Healthcare providers should be educated on the CBL and relevant policies should be developed to facilitate the implementation of CBL in the clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal.
As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.