Ureteral Wall Thickness as an Independent Predictor of Stone Impaction - A Prospective, Single-Center, Observational Study.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-04 DOI:10.4103/njcp.njcp_405_24
F B Daniel, V Palaniyandi, N Kumaresan, S Krishnamoorthy, G Thiruvengadam
{"title":"Ureteral Wall Thickness as an Independent Predictor of Stone Impaction - A Prospective, Single-Center, Observational Study.","authors":"F B Daniel, V Palaniyandi, N Kumaresan, S Krishnamoorthy, G Thiruvengadam","doi":"10.4103/njcp.njcp_405_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urologists can encounter difficulties when dealing with ureteral stone impaction. However, reliable preoperative indicators of stone impaction are scarce.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to determine ureteral wall thickness (UWT) as an independent predictor of intraoperative stone impaction, to detect if any patient or stone-related factors predict impaction and to ascertain whether impaction affected intraoperative/postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively studied 83 patients who underwent ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy for ureteral stones between October 2023 and March 2024. UWT measurement was done preoperatively on non-contrast computed tomography. Clinical predictors of stone impaction were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to identify the optimal cutoff for independently predicting impaction. We also analyzed intraoperative and postoperative outcomes with respect to impaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 83 patients, 46 (55.42%) had impacted stones. Gender, stone laterality, stone size, area, Hounsfield unit, degree of hydronephrosis, duration of symptoms, and UWT had significant association with stone impaction on univariate analysis. When these factors were subjected to multivariate analysis, only UWT and stone area had significant association with impaction. We determined a UWT cutoff of 3.45 mm and a stone area cutoff of 28.62 mm2 for predicting impaction based on ROC analysis. Our study showed that impaction increased the overall duration of the procedure and affected stone clearance rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on our study, high UWT is associated with a higher risk of stone impaction, prolonged duration of procedure, and lower stone clearance rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":19431,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"27 12","pages":"1456-1463"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_405_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Urologists can encounter difficulties when dealing with ureteral stone impaction. However, reliable preoperative indicators of stone impaction are scarce.

Aims: We aimed to determine ureteral wall thickness (UWT) as an independent predictor of intraoperative stone impaction, to detect if any patient or stone-related factors predict impaction and to ascertain whether impaction affected intraoperative/postoperative outcomes.

Methods: We prospectively studied 83 patients who underwent ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy for ureteral stones between October 2023 and March 2024. UWT measurement was done preoperatively on non-contrast computed tomography. Clinical predictors of stone impaction were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to identify the optimal cutoff for independently predicting impaction. We also analyzed intraoperative and postoperative outcomes with respect to impaction.

Results: Out of 83 patients, 46 (55.42%) had impacted stones. Gender, stone laterality, stone size, area, Hounsfield unit, degree of hydronephrosis, duration of symptoms, and UWT had significant association with stone impaction on univariate analysis. When these factors were subjected to multivariate analysis, only UWT and stone area had significant association with impaction. We determined a UWT cutoff of 3.45 mm and a stone area cutoff of 28.62 mm2 for predicting impaction based on ROC analysis. Our study showed that impaction increased the overall duration of the procedure and affected stone clearance rates.

Conclusion: Based on our study, high UWT is associated with a higher risk of stone impaction, prolonged duration of procedure, and lower stone clearance rates.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
275
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice is a Monthly peer-reviewed international journal published by the Medical and Dental Consultants’ Association of Nigeria. The journal’s full text is available online at www.njcponline.com. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal makes a token charge for submission, processing and publication of manuscripts including color reproduction of photographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信