Computational modelling reveals the influence of object similarity and proximity on visually guided movements.

IF 2.3 3区 生物学 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PeerJ Pub Date : 2025-02-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7717/peerj.18953
Mandar Manjunath Patil, Dietmar Heinke, Fan Zhang
{"title":"Computational modelling reveals the influence of object similarity and proximity on visually guided movements.","authors":"Mandar Manjunath Patil, Dietmar Heinke, Fan Zhang","doi":"10.7717/peerj.18953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The paper aims to understand how humans reach for a single target object in multi-object scenes. In a previous empirical study, human subjects were asked to execute reaches to a single target among non-targets (choice reaching task). In the current work, we re-analysed the human data and implemented a neurobiologically-plausible cognitive robotics model (choice reaching with a LEGO arm robot, CoRLEGO) that mimics human reaches in the choice reaching task. The results from the experiment confirmed the commonly made assumption that proximity and similarity between objects (also termed perceptual grouping) affect the quality of the reaches. However, what was novel here was that modelling the reaches also allowed to temporally separate these factors, as the start of the movement was affected by both factors while the reach trajectory was affected only by proximity between target and distractor objects indicating that human information processing of visual stimuli applies these factors in a serial fashion. In particular, our model architecture and the optimised parameter settings suggest that object proximity directly influences the movement onset. In addition, our computational model confirmed this interpretation but also revealed that the relationship between the two factors may be affected by how the participants balanced speed (starting time of the movement) and accuracy of reaching (straightness of reaches). Future research will need to test whether this plausible prediction is correct.</p>","PeriodicalId":19799,"journal":{"name":"PeerJ","volume":"13 ","pages":"e18953"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869896/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PeerJ","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.18953","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper aims to understand how humans reach for a single target object in multi-object scenes. In a previous empirical study, human subjects were asked to execute reaches to a single target among non-targets (choice reaching task). In the current work, we re-analysed the human data and implemented a neurobiologically-plausible cognitive robotics model (choice reaching with a LEGO arm robot, CoRLEGO) that mimics human reaches in the choice reaching task. The results from the experiment confirmed the commonly made assumption that proximity and similarity between objects (also termed perceptual grouping) affect the quality of the reaches. However, what was novel here was that modelling the reaches also allowed to temporally separate these factors, as the start of the movement was affected by both factors while the reach trajectory was affected only by proximity between target and distractor objects indicating that human information processing of visual stimuli applies these factors in a serial fashion. In particular, our model architecture and the optimised parameter settings suggest that object proximity directly influences the movement onset. In addition, our computational model confirmed this interpretation but also revealed that the relationship between the two factors may be affected by how the participants balanced speed (starting time of the movement) and accuracy of reaching (straightness of reaches). Future research will need to test whether this plausible prediction is correct.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PeerJ
PeerJ MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1665
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: PeerJ is an open access peer-reviewed scientific journal covering research in the biological and medical sciences. At PeerJ, authors take out a lifetime publication plan (for as little as $99) which allows them to publish articles in the journal for free, forever. PeerJ has 5 Nobel Prize Winners on the Board; they have won several industry and media awards; and they are widely recognized as being one of the most interesting recent developments in academic publishing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信