Weight gain following an employer-based randomized trial evaluating the treatment of obesity with and without anti-obesity medication.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Noura Nachawi, Marcio L Griebeler, Huijun Xiao, James Bena, Kevin M Pantalone, Bartolome Burguera
{"title":"Weight gain following an employer-based randomized trial evaluating the treatment of obesity with and without anti-obesity medication.","authors":"Noura Nachawi, Marcio L Griebeler, Huijun Xiao, James Bena, Kevin M Pantalone, Bartolome Burguera","doi":"10.1016/j.orcp.2025.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) reported superior weight loss when anti-obesity medications (AOMs) were added to a 1-year employer-based weight management program (WMP+Rx) compared to WMP alone. Evidence regarding sustainability of weight loss, upon trial completion, is lacking. This report aims to evaluate weight loss sustainability upon completion of the RCT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, observational report, analyzed data from subjects post-completion of the previous RCT. The main outcome was the mean change in body weight from baseline (end visit of the previous RCT) to 24 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 199 subjects included in the RCT, 185 subjects who had pre-trial (prior to the previous RCT) and baseline weight (end visit of the previous RCT) were included in this report. Both groups; [WMP+Rx; 97 subjects, (52.4 %)] and [WMP; 88 subjects (47.6 %)] demonstrated an increase in mean body weight during the observational follow-up period; 5.2 % (95 % CI: 3.4 %, 7 %) and 6.3 % (95 % CI: 4.5 %, 8.1 %) for the WMP+Rx and 1.3 % (95 % CI: -0.6 %, 3.1 %) and 2.1 % (95 % CI: 0.3 %, 4 %) for the WMP, at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Higher percentages of individuals who gained of > 5 % of baseline weight was observed in the WMP+Rx vs WMP group; (47 %) vs (28 %) [odds ratio OR 3.16 (95 % CI: 1.19, 8.37), (P = 0.02)] and (51 %) vs (39 %) [OR 2.85 (95 %CI: 0.93,8.74), (P = 0.067)], at 12 and 24 months, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Weight loss achieved with WMP with or without AOMs was not maintained at 12 and 24 months. Chronic obesity management is needed for sustainable outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19408,"journal":{"name":"Obesity research & clinical practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity research & clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orcp.2025.02.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) reported superior weight loss when anti-obesity medications (AOMs) were added to a 1-year employer-based weight management program (WMP+Rx) compared to WMP alone. Evidence regarding sustainability of weight loss, upon trial completion, is lacking. This report aims to evaluate weight loss sustainability upon completion of the RCT.

Methods: This retrospective, observational report, analyzed data from subjects post-completion of the previous RCT. The main outcome was the mean change in body weight from baseline (end visit of the previous RCT) to 24 months.

Results: Of 199 subjects included in the RCT, 185 subjects who had pre-trial (prior to the previous RCT) and baseline weight (end visit of the previous RCT) were included in this report. Both groups; [WMP+Rx; 97 subjects, (52.4 %)] and [WMP; 88 subjects (47.6 %)] demonstrated an increase in mean body weight during the observational follow-up period; 5.2 % (95 % CI: 3.4 %, 7 %) and 6.3 % (95 % CI: 4.5 %, 8.1 %) for the WMP+Rx and 1.3 % (95 % CI: -0.6 %, 3.1 %) and 2.1 % (95 % CI: 0.3 %, 4 %) for the WMP, at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Higher percentages of individuals who gained of > 5 % of baseline weight was observed in the WMP+Rx vs WMP group; (47 %) vs (28 %) [odds ratio OR 3.16 (95 % CI: 1.19, 8.37), (P = 0.02)] and (51 %) vs (39 %) [OR 2.85 (95 %CI: 0.93,8.74), (P = 0.067)], at 12 and 24 months, respectively.

Conclusions: Weight loss achieved with WMP with or without AOMs was not maintained at 12 and 24 months. Chronic obesity management is needed for sustainable outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obesity research & clinical practice
Obesity research & clinical practice 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The aim of Obesity Research & Clinical Practice (ORCP) is to publish high quality clinical and basic research relating to the epidemiology, mechanism, complications and treatment of obesity and the complication of obesity. Studies relating to the Asia Oceania region are particularly welcome, given the increasing burden of obesity in Asia Pacific, compounded by specific regional population-based and genetic issues, and the devastating personal and economic consequences. The journal aims to expose health care practitioners, clinical researchers, basic scientists, epidemiologists, and public health officials in the region to all areas of obesity research and practice. In addition to original research the ORCP publishes reviews, patient reports, short communications, and letters to the editor (including comments on published papers). The proceedings and abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Asia Oceania Association for the Study of Obesity is published as a supplement each year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信