Characterization of Anal Slow Waves and Ultraslow Waves in Patients With Constipation and Healthy Subjects.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurogastroenterology and Motility Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1111/nmo.70006
Lulu Zhang, Yoav Mazor, Gillian Prott, Michael Jones, Allison Malcolm
{"title":"Characterization of Anal Slow Waves and Ultraslow Waves in Patients With Constipation and Healthy Subjects.","authors":"Lulu Zhang, Yoav Mazor, Gillian Prott, Michael Jones, Allison Malcolm","doi":"10.1111/nmo.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anal slow waves (SW) and ultraslow waves (USW) have been documented previously, yet their significance remains uncertain. Our aims were to characterize the prevalence and features of SW and USW in healthy subjects and patients with constipation and to correlate them with clinical features and anorectal physiological testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-three healthy female subjects and 83 female tertiary referral patients with constipation were included. High-resolution water-perfused manometry was performed. Retrospective blinded descriptive and quantitative analyses of manometric tracings were completed with a focus on SW and USW.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>SW were present in 58% of healthy subjects and 62% of constipated patients (p = 0.72) yet USW were seen almost exclusively in constipated patients (27% vs. 2% health; p < 0.0001). Frequencies and mean amplitudes of SW and USW were similar in both groups. Anal resting and squeeze pressures were higher in patients with SW compared to those without (p < 0.001, p = 0.004, respectively). Patients with USW had higher anal resting pressure and shorter duration of sustained squeeze compared to those without (p < 0.001 for both). There was a trend for less obstetric injury in constipated patients with USW compared to those without (23% vs. 48%; p = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and interferences: </strong>While SW were common in both constipated and healthy subjects, USW were almost exclusively observed in constipated patients. Some correlations were observed with other anorectal physiology parameters such as high resting anal pressure with both SW and USW. Formal definitions for SW and USW are proposed. Further research into the clinical significance of these waves is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e70006"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.70006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anal slow waves (SW) and ultraslow waves (USW) have been documented previously, yet their significance remains uncertain. Our aims were to characterize the prevalence and features of SW and USW in healthy subjects and patients with constipation and to correlate them with clinical features and anorectal physiological testing.

Methods: Forty-three healthy female subjects and 83 female tertiary referral patients with constipation were included. High-resolution water-perfused manometry was performed. Retrospective blinded descriptive and quantitative analyses of manometric tracings were completed with a focus on SW and USW.

Key results: SW were present in 58% of healthy subjects and 62% of constipated patients (p = 0.72) yet USW were seen almost exclusively in constipated patients (27% vs. 2% health; p < 0.0001). Frequencies and mean amplitudes of SW and USW were similar in both groups. Anal resting and squeeze pressures were higher in patients with SW compared to those without (p < 0.001, p = 0.004, respectively). Patients with USW had higher anal resting pressure and shorter duration of sustained squeeze compared to those without (p < 0.001 for both). There was a trend for less obstetric injury in constipated patients with USW compared to those without (23% vs. 48%; p = 0.05).

Conclusions and interferences: While SW were common in both constipated and healthy subjects, USW were almost exclusively observed in constipated patients. Some correlations were observed with other anorectal physiology parameters such as high resting anal pressure with both SW and USW. Formal definitions for SW and USW are proposed. Further research into the clinical significance of these waves is warranted.

便秘患者和健康人肛门慢波和超低波的特征。
背景:肛门慢波(SW)和超低波(USW)先前已被记录,但其意义尚不确定。我们的目的是描述健康受试者和便秘患者中SW和USW的患病率和特征,并将其与临床特征和肛肠生理检查联系起来。方法:选取健康女性43例和女性三级转诊便秘患者83例。进行高分辨率水灌注测压。以SW和USW为重点,完成了压力描记的回顾性盲法描述性和定量分析。关键结果:58%的健康受试者和62%的便秘患者存在SW (p = 0.72),但USW几乎只出现在便秘患者中(27%对2%健康;p结论和干扰:虽然SW在便秘和健康受试者中都很常见,但USW几乎只在便秘患者中观察到。在SW和USW中观察到与其他肛门直肠生理参数的相关性,如高静息肛压。提出了软件设计和USW的正式定义。进一步研究这些波的临床意义是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信