The infralimbic, but not the prelimbic cortex is needed for a complex olfactory memory task

IF 2.2 4区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Dahae J. Jun, Rebecca Shannon, Katherine Tschida, David M. Smith
{"title":"The infralimbic, but not the prelimbic cortex is needed for a complex olfactory memory task","authors":"Dahae J. Jun,&nbsp;Rebecca Shannon,&nbsp;Katherine Tschida,&nbsp;David M. Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.nlm.2025.108038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) plays a key role in memory and behavioral flexibility, and a growing body of evidence suggests that the prelimbic (PL) and infralimbic (IL) subregions contribute differently to these processes. Studies of fear conditioning and goal-directed learning suggest that the PL promotes behavioral responses and memory retrieval, while the IL inhibits them. Other studies have shown that the mPFC is engaged under conditions of high interference. This raises the possibility that the PL and IL play differing roles in resolving interference. To examine this, we first used chemogenetics (DREADDs) to suppress mPFC neuronal activity and tested subjects on a conditional discrimination task known to be sensitive to muscimol inactivation. After confirming the effectiveness of the DREADD procedures, we conducted a second experiment to examine the PL and IL roles in a high interference memory task. We trained rats on two consecutive sets of conflicting odor discrimination problems, A and B, followed by test sessions involving a mid-session switch between the problem sets. Controls repeatedly performed worse on Set A, suggesting that learning Set B inhibited the rats’ ability to retrieve Set A memories (i.e. retroactive interference). PL inactivation rats performed similarly to controls. However, IL inactivation rats did not show this effect, suggesting that the IL plays a critical role in suppressing the retrieval of previously acquired memories that may interfere with retrieval of more recent memories. These results suggest that the IL plays a critical role in memory control processes needed for resolving interference.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19102,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Learning and Memory","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 108038"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Learning and Memory","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107474272500019X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) plays a key role in memory and behavioral flexibility, and a growing body of evidence suggests that the prelimbic (PL) and infralimbic (IL) subregions contribute differently to these processes. Studies of fear conditioning and goal-directed learning suggest that the PL promotes behavioral responses and memory retrieval, while the IL inhibits them. Other studies have shown that the mPFC is engaged under conditions of high interference. This raises the possibility that the PL and IL play differing roles in resolving interference. To examine this, we first used chemogenetics (DREADDs) to suppress mPFC neuronal activity and tested subjects on a conditional discrimination task known to be sensitive to muscimol inactivation. After confirming the effectiveness of the DREADD procedures, we conducted a second experiment to examine the PL and IL roles in a high interference memory task. We trained rats on two consecutive sets of conflicting odor discrimination problems, A and B, followed by test sessions involving a mid-session switch between the problem sets. Controls repeatedly performed worse on Set A, suggesting that learning Set B inhibited the rats’ ability to retrieve Set A memories (i.e. retroactive interference). PL inactivation rats performed similarly to controls. However, IL inactivation rats did not show this effect, suggesting that the IL plays a critical role in suppressing the retrieval of previously acquired memories that may interfere with retrieval of more recent memories. These results suggest that the IL plays a critical role in memory control processes needed for resolving interference.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
77
审稿时长
12.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurobiology of Learning and Memory publishes articles examining the neurobiological mechanisms underlying learning and memory at all levels of analysis ranging from molecular biology to synaptic and neural plasticity and behavior. We are especially interested in manuscripts that examine the neural circuits and molecular mechanisms underlying learning, memory and plasticity in both experimental animals and human subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信