Semi-Automated Interphase FISH (iFISH) Spot Scoring in CD138-Positive Cells: Validation Study for Genetic Abnormalities Detection in Multiple Myeloma.

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Daniela Borri, Chin Jia Lin, Victor Camillo, Renata K Kishimoto, Mauren F M Santos, Roberta M Safranauskas, Maria G Cordeiro, Jason de L Silva, Amanda A C Coimbra, Gilmara de S E Silva, Murilo C Cervato, Elvira D R P Velloso
{"title":"Semi-Automated Interphase FISH (iFISH) Spot Scoring in CD138-Positive Cells: Validation Study for Genetic Abnormalities Detection in Multiple Myeloma.","authors":"Daniela Borri, Chin Jia Lin, Victor Camillo, Renata K Kishimoto, Mauren F M Santos, Roberta M Safranauskas, Maria G Cordeiro, Jason de L Silva, Amanda A C Coimbra, Gilmara de S E Silva, Murilo C Cervato, Elvira D R P Velloso","doi":"10.1002/jemt.24844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We conducted a study to validate the automated scoring of Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH) in a routine cytogenetics laboratory using selected CD138-positive cells in samples from patients with multiple myeloma. A workstation was optimized based on the manufacturer's configurations. Six commercial probes (CDKN2C/CKS1B, RB1/DLEU1/LAMP1, TP53/CEN17, FGFR3::IGH, CCND1::IGH, and IGH::MAF) were examined to detect gains, losses, and rearrangements of genes across a total of 180 slides. We used reference values proposed by the European Myeloma Network (10% for rearrangements and 20% for gains and losses) to compare the accuracy of manual, automated, and semi-automated (automated coupled with manual revision) scoring. The time spent by the biologist to perform semi-automated and manual scoring was compared. Automated scoring was not effective and lacked validation. In contrast, semi-automated scoring proved to be efficient and highly accurate for all probes and offered time-saving benefits for deletion/gain probes. These findings suggest that semi-automated iFISH scoring for multiple myeloma is feasible and could become a routine practice in cytogenetics laboratories.</p>","PeriodicalId":18684,"journal":{"name":"Microscopy Research and Technique","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microscopy Research and Technique","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.24844","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We conducted a study to validate the automated scoring of Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH) in a routine cytogenetics laboratory using selected CD138-positive cells in samples from patients with multiple myeloma. A workstation was optimized based on the manufacturer's configurations. Six commercial probes (CDKN2C/CKS1B, RB1/DLEU1/LAMP1, TP53/CEN17, FGFR3::IGH, CCND1::IGH, and IGH::MAF) were examined to detect gains, losses, and rearrangements of genes across a total of 180 slides. We used reference values proposed by the European Myeloma Network (10% for rearrangements and 20% for gains and losses) to compare the accuracy of manual, automated, and semi-automated (automated coupled with manual revision) scoring. The time spent by the biologist to perform semi-automated and manual scoring was compared. Automated scoring was not effective and lacked validation. In contrast, semi-automated scoring proved to be efficient and highly accurate for all probes and offered time-saving benefits for deletion/gain probes. These findings suggest that semi-automated iFISH scoring for multiple myeloma is feasible and could become a routine practice in cytogenetics laboratories.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microscopy Research and Technique
Microscopy Research and Technique 医学-解剖学与形态学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
233
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Microscopy Research and Technique (MRT) publishes articles on all aspects of advanced microscopy original architecture and methodologies with applications in the biological, clinical, chemical, and materials sciences. Original basic and applied research as well as technical papers dealing with the various subsets of microscopy are encouraged. MRT is the right form for those developing new microscopy methods or using the microscope to answer key questions in basic and applied research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信