Anticipating complications in stereotactic brain biopsy: a predictive approach.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alexandre Lavé, Henri Malaizé, Karima Mokhtari, Lucia Nichelli, Rémy Bernard, Bertrand Mathon
{"title":"Anticipating complications in stereotactic brain biopsy: a predictive approach.","authors":"Alexandre Lavé, Henri Malaizé, Karima Mokhtari, Lucia Nichelli, Rémy Bernard, Bertrand Mathon","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03415-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stereotactic brain biopsy is a critical procedure in neurosurgery, particularly for the diagnosis of brain tumors and cryptogenic neurological diseases. Despite its safety profile, biopsy procedures carry a risk of complications. This study aimed to identify predictors of symptomatic complications in a large cohort and develop a risk prediction score. This retrospective single-center study examined data from 2,338 stereotactic brain biopsies performed over 15 years. The primary outcomes included complication rates, severity, timing, and management. Factors such as patient demographics, medical history, lesion characteristics, and biopsy procedures were analyzed. Predictive models were created using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to select key variables with cross-validation and a random forest algorithm for further refinement. Owing to insufficient predictive performance for clinical use, we used variables selected by LASSO regression to construct an analytical multivariate model. Symptomatic complications occurred in 3.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1-4.7) of cases, with 0.8% being fatal. Of the symptomatic complications, 46.2% occurred within the first hour following biopsy and 71.4% within two hours. Key predictive factors included biopsy repetition (odds ratio, 3.3; 95%CI [1.1-9.6], p = 0.050), advanced age (1.2 [1.02-1.4], p = 0.048), lesion location (brainstem (4.1 [1.6-10.4], p = 0.004), pineal region (16.2 [3.0-89.4], p = 0.001), deep brain (1.8 [1.1-2.9], p = 0.016)), and toxoplasmosis (4.9 [1.4-17.7], p = 0.038). The best predictive model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of only 0.64 and the random forest models had poorer discriminative accuracy (AUC < 0.6). Symptomatic complications following stereotactic brain biopsy are rare, but are associated with specific patient profiles. Although predictive modeling provided moderate accuracy, further refinement is necessary for reliable risk stratification. Awareness of high-risk patient characteristics and rigorous procedural planning are essential for minimizing complications. Future studies should explore advanced predictive methods and refine the risk assessment tools to improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"279"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03415-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stereotactic brain biopsy is a critical procedure in neurosurgery, particularly for the diagnosis of brain tumors and cryptogenic neurological diseases. Despite its safety profile, biopsy procedures carry a risk of complications. This study aimed to identify predictors of symptomatic complications in a large cohort and develop a risk prediction score. This retrospective single-center study examined data from 2,338 stereotactic brain biopsies performed over 15 years. The primary outcomes included complication rates, severity, timing, and management. Factors such as patient demographics, medical history, lesion characteristics, and biopsy procedures were analyzed. Predictive models were created using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to select key variables with cross-validation and a random forest algorithm for further refinement. Owing to insufficient predictive performance for clinical use, we used variables selected by LASSO regression to construct an analytical multivariate model. Symptomatic complications occurred in 3.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1-4.7) of cases, with 0.8% being fatal. Of the symptomatic complications, 46.2% occurred within the first hour following biopsy and 71.4% within two hours. Key predictive factors included biopsy repetition (odds ratio, 3.3; 95%CI [1.1-9.6], p = 0.050), advanced age (1.2 [1.02-1.4], p = 0.048), lesion location (brainstem (4.1 [1.6-10.4], p = 0.004), pineal region (16.2 [3.0-89.4], p = 0.001), deep brain (1.8 [1.1-2.9], p = 0.016)), and toxoplasmosis (4.9 [1.4-17.7], p = 0.038). The best predictive model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of only 0.64 and the random forest models had poorer discriminative accuracy (AUC < 0.6). Symptomatic complications following stereotactic brain biopsy are rare, but are associated with specific patient profiles. Although predictive modeling provided moderate accuracy, further refinement is necessary for reliable risk stratification. Awareness of high-risk patient characteristics and rigorous procedural planning are essential for minimizing complications. Future studies should explore advanced predictive methods and refine the risk assessment tools to improve patient outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信