Is Excretory Phase Computerized Tomography Important for Evaluation of Pediatric High-Grade Renal Trauma?

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Ching Man Carmen Tong, Luke Shumaker, Jacob Lucas, Vinaya Bhatia, Albert Lee, Benjamin Abelson, Gabriella L Crane, Christina Ho, Christopher J Long, Robert T Russell, Harold N Lovvorn, Ming-Hsien Wang, Dana A Weiss, Douglass B Clayton, David M Kitchens
{"title":"Is Excretory Phase Computerized Tomography Important for Evaluation of Pediatric High-Grade Renal Trauma?","authors":"Ching Man Carmen Tong, Luke Shumaker, Jacob Lucas, Vinaya Bhatia, Albert Lee, Benjamin Abelson, Gabriella L Crane, Christina Ho, Christopher J Long, Robert T Russell, Harold N Lovvorn, Ming-Hsien Wang, Dana A Weiss, Douglass B Clayton, David M Kitchens","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There are no standardized guidelines for evaluation of pediatric renal trauma. We hypothesize that screening radiographic studies performed to rule out traumatic renal injuries in children can initially be evaluated by contrast-enhanced CT scans that lack an excretory phase.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected data from five pediatric trauma centers between 2007-2020. Patients younger than 18 years old with renal trauma AAST grade 3 or higher were included. Outcomes data includes the rate for delayed surgical or radiologic interventions, complications, or readmissions related to the initial renal injuries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>351 children were included. 36% (127/351) had excretory-phase CT (EPCT) at initial evaluation. Median age was 13.6 (IQR 9.1-16.3) years. 56.7% (72/127) EPCT patients had grade IV/V injury vs. 53.6% (120/224) in NEPCT (p=0.3). 96% (338/351) were blunt injuries. NEPCT patients had higher median injury severity scores (21 vs. 16, p<0.01). EPCT children did not have more urinary drainage procedures (ureteral stent or percutaneous drain) (18% vs. 12%, p=0.11). Patients with initial NEPCT did not experience longer hospital stay (p=0.46), increased complications (p=0.52) or readmissions (p=0.54). Importantly, gross hematuria significantly predicted need for renal procedures (OR = 2.06, 95% CI 1.28-5.2, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with initial NEPCT did not experience increased adverse outcomes or readmission. Those presenting with gross hematuria had increased risk of higher-grade renal injury and need for renal procedure. This study suggests that high-grade pediatric renal trauma can be safely evaluated with NEPCT in initial trauma workup unless they present with gross hematuria.</p>","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":"101097JU0000000000004515"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004515","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: There are no standardized guidelines for evaluation of pediatric renal trauma. We hypothesize that screening radiographic studies performed to rule out traumatic renal injuries in children can initially be evaluated by contrast-enhanced CT scans that lack an excretory phase.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively collected data from five pediatric trauma centers between 2007-2020. Patients younger than 18 years old with renal trauma AAST grade 3 or higher were included. Outcomes data includes the rate for delayed surgical or radiologic interventions, complications, or readmissions related to the initial renal injuries.

Results: 351 children were included. 36% (127/351) had excretory-phase CT (EPCT) at initial evaluation. Median age was 13.6 (IQR 9.1-16.3) years. 56.7% (72/127) EPCT patients had grade IV/V injury vs. 53.6% (120/224) in NEPCT (p=0.3). 96% (338/351) were blunt injuries. NEPCT patients had higher median injury severity scores (21 vs. 16, p<0.01). EPCT children did not have more urinary drainage procedures (ureteral stent or percutaneous drain) (18% vs. 12%, p=0.11). Patients with initial NEPCT did not experience longer hospital stay (p=0.46), increased complications (p=0.52) or readmissions (p=0.54). Importantly, gross hematuria significantly predicted need for renal procedures (OR = 2.06, 95% CI 1.28-5.2, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Patients with initial NEPCT did not experience increased adverse outcomes or readmission. Those presenting with gross hematuria had increased risk of higher-grade renal injury and need for renal procedure. This study suggests that high-grade pediatric renal trauma can be safely evaluated with NEPCT in initial trauma workup unless they present with gross hematuria.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Urology
Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
7.60%
发文量
3746
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the American Urological Association (AUA), and the most widely read and highly cited journal in the field, The Journal of Urology® brings solid coverage of the clinically relevant content needed to stay at the forefront of the dynamic field of urology. This premier journal presents investigative studies on critical areas of research and practice, survey articles providing short condensations of the best and most important urology literature worldwide, and practice-oriented reports on significant clinical observations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信