M R Jansen, M El Moumni, B L van Leeuwen, P C van den Akker, E Rácz
{"title":"Identifying high-risk melanoma patients: The importance of acquiring a detailed family history.","authors":"M R Jansen, M El Moumni, B L van Leeuwen, P C van den Akker, E Rácz","doi":"10.1111/jdv.20601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is essential to identify individuals with the highest risk of developing melanoma and to withhold individuals from surveillance with a low risk. However, international consensus on surveillance indications and the role of family history is still lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide more insight into the association between a family history of melanoma and the risk of developing melanoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults who participated in the surveillance programme of the University Medical Center Groningen between June 1995 and November 2017 were retrospectively included. Participants were stratified into risk groups according to genetic assessment and family history following current Dutch guidelines: hereditary melanoma (risk group 1), familial melanoma (risk group 2) and their first-degree relatives (risk group 3), and other screening reasons (risk group 0). We included individuals fulfilling the 'possible familial melanoma' criteria (risk group 4) and their first-degree relatives (risk group 5), as evolving Dutch guidelines no longer recommend to screen these individuals. Melanoma incidence during follow-up was compared with the general population using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), and the rate of developing melanomas was compared between risk groups and expressed as adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 224 participants were included (mean age 44.7 years; 56.7% female). During a median follow-up of 5.6 years (IQR, 3.7-7.8), a total number of 61 melanomas were diagnosed among 38 (17.0%) participants. The overall melanoma risk was significantly higher than in the general population (SIR 73). The rate of developing melanoma in risk group 4 was comparable to risk group 2 (aHR 1.27, p = 0.576).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Stratification of individuals according to their family history of melanoma identifies those with a high risk of developing melanoma. Contrary to Dutch recommendations, surveillance should also be considered for melanoma patients fulfilling the 'possible familial melanoma' criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":17351,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.20601","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: It is essential to identify individuals with the highest risk of developing melanoma and to withhold individuals from surveillance with a low risk. However, international consensus on surveillance indications and the role of family history is still lacking.
Objective: To provide more insight into the association between a family history of melanoma and the risk of developing melanoma.
Methods: Adults who participated in the surveillance programme of the University Medical Center Groningen between June 1995 and November 2017 were retrospectively included. Participants were stratified into risk groups according to genetic assessment and family history following current Dutch guidelines: hereditary melanoma (risk group 1), familial melanoma (risk group 2) and their first-degree relatives (risk group 3), and other screening reasons (risk group 0). We included individuals fulfilling the 'possible familial melanoma' criteria (risk group 4) and their first-degree relatives (risk group 5), as evolving Dutch guidelines no longer recommend to screen these individuals. Melanoma incidence during follow-up was compared with the general population using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), and the rate of developing melanomas was compared between risk groups and expressed as adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs).
Results: In total, 224 participants were included (mean age 44.7 years; 56.7% female). During a median follow-up of 5.6 years (IQR, 3.7-7.8), a total number of 61 melanomas were diagnosed among 38 (17.0%) participants. The overall melanoma risk was significantly higher than in the general population (SIR 73). The rate of developing melanoma in risk group 4 was comparable to risk group 2 (aHR 1.27, p = 0.576).
Conclusions: Stratification of individuals according to their family history of melanoma identifies those with a high risk of developing melanoma. Contrary to Dutch recommendations, surveillance should also be considered for melanoma patients fulfilling the 'possible familial melanoma' criteria.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (JEADV) is a publication that focuses on dermatology and venereology. It covers various topics within these fields, including both clinical and basic science subjects. The journal publishes articles in different formats, such as editorials, review articles, practice articles, original papers, short reports, letters to the editor, features, and announcements from the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV).
The journal covers a wide range of keywords, including allergy, cancer, clinical medicine, cytokines, dermatology, drug reactions, hair disease, laser therapy, nail disease, oncology, skin cancer, skin disease, therapeutics, tumors, virus infections, and venereology.
The JEADV is indexed and abstracted by various databases and resources, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Embase, Global Health, InfoTrac, Ingenta Select, MEDLINE/PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, and others.