Efficacy and Safety of Prophylactic Intrathecal or Epidural Normal Saline for Preventing Post-Dural Puncture Headache After Dural Puncture: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-02-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S494237
Weiwei Jing, Yushan Ma, Yantong Wan, Hao Li
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Prophylactic Intrathecal or Epidural Normal Saline for Preventing Post-Dural Puncture Headache After Dural Puncture: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.","authors":"Weiwei Jing, Yushan Ma, Yantong Wan, Hao Li","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S494237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is the most common and troublesome complication following iatrogenic puncture of the dura. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrathecal or epidural saline injection to prevent PDPH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, supplemented by a manual search of reference lists of related articles. Studies were eligible if they compared intrathecal or epidural injection or continuous saline infusion with no intervention in patients with accidental or intentional dural puncture. Trials reporting PDPH outcomes were considered eligible. The type of surgeries and patient populations were not restricted. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the risk estimate of dichotomous outcomes. The funnel plot, Egger, and Begg tests were performed to assess the publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 13 studies involving 1589 patients, revealing a high publication bias. Normal saline injection reduced the incidence of PDPH (RR=0.57, 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.74, P<0.0001, I<sup>2</sup>=66%, P-heterogeneity=0.0004) and the requirement for an epidural blood patch (RR=0.37, 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.54, P<0.00001, I<sup>2</sup>=29%, P-heterogeneity=0.23).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Saline administration after dural puncture appears to be a promising option for preventing PDPH. However, heterogeneity among the studies and publication bias with positive results limits the available evidence. Therefore, further large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm our findings.</p><p><strong>Register: </strong>CRD42022342509.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"915-927"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872095/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S494237","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is the most common and troublesome complication following iatrogenic puncture of the dura. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrathecal or epidural saline injection to prevent PDPH.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, supplemented by a manual search of reference lists of related articles. Studies were eligible if they compared intrathecal or epidural injection or continuous saline infusion with no intervention in patients with accidental or intentional dural puncture. Trials reporting PDPH outcomes were considered eligible. The type of surgeries and patient populations were not restricted. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the risk estimate of dichotomous outcomes. The funnel plot, Egger, and Begg tests were performed to assess the publication bias.

Results: We identified 13 studies involving 1589 patients, revealing a high publication bias. Normal saline injection reduced the incidence of PDPH (RR=0.57, 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.74, P<0.0001, I2=66%, P-heterogeneity=0.0004) and the requirement for an epidural blood patch (RR=0.37, 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.54, P<0.00001, I2=29%, P-heterogeneity=0.23).

Conclusion: Saline administration after dural puncture appears to be a promising option for preventing PDPH. However, heterogeneity among the studies and publication bias with positive results limits the available evidence. Therefore, further large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm our findings.

Register: CRD42022342509.

预防性硬膜内或硬膜外生理盐水预防硬膜穿刺后头痛的有效性和安全性:荟萃分析和系统评价。
背景:硬脑膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH)是医源性硬脑膜穿刺后最常见和最棘手的并发症。本研究旨在评估鞘内或硬膜外生理盐水注射预防PDPH的有效性和安全性。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library的文献,并人工检索相关文献的参考书目。如果比较意外或故意硬膜穿刺患者的鞘内或硬膜外注射或连续生理盐水输注与不干预的情况,研究是合格的。报告PDPH结果的试验被认为是合格的。手术类型和患者人群没有限制。计算具有95%置信区间(CI)的风险比(rr)用于二分类结果的风险估计。采用漏斗图、Egger和Begg检验评估发表偏倚。结果:我们确定了13项研究,涉及1589例患者,显示出高发表偏倚。生理盐水注射降低了PDPH的发生率(RR=0.57, 95% CI: 0.43 ~ 0.74, P2=66%, p -异质性=0.0004)和硬膜外血贴的需求(RR=0.37, 95% CI: 0.25 ~ 0.54, P2=29%, p -异质性=0.23)。结论:硬脑膜穿刺后给予生理盐水似乎是预防PDPH的一个有希望的选择。然而,研究之间的异质性和阳性结果的发表偏倚限制了可获得的证据。因此,需要进一步的大规模随机对照试验来证实我们的发现。注册:CRD42022342509。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信