Diaphragm Fatigue Does Not Impact Breathing Mechanics or Function in People with Chronic Low Back Pain.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-02-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S496917
Ulrike H Mitchell, Lindsey T Robinson, Jared Brinkman, Dustin A Bruening, Anton E Bowden, Steven P Allen
{"title":"Diaphragm Fatigue Does Not Impact Breathing Mechanics or Function in People with Chronic Low Back Pain.","authors":"Ulrike H Mitchell, Lindsey T Robinson, Jared Brinkman, Dustin A Bruening, Anton E Bowden, Steven P Allen","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S496917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The diaphragm is an important respiratory muscle that also plays a crucial role in developing intra-abdominal pressure and assisting in spinal stability. Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a complex musculoskeletal condition and has been associated with respiratory problems and altered breathing mechanics. The purpose of this comparative cross-sectional study is to investigate whether diaphragm fatigue affects breathing mechanics and function in individuals with CLBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Volunteers were recruited between the ages of 35-65 years old with and without CLBP. Participants performed 30 minutes of exercises intended to fatigue the diaphragm. The following respiratory parameters were measured: Breathing mechanics (chest and abdominal movement and respiratory rate), diaphragm function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) using a handheld spirometer), and diaphragm movement as measured by sub-diaphragm (L1 to diaphragm domes) volume changes at the end of exhalation and inhalation using MRI scans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 36 participants were recruited (n = 21M; n = 15F), with 18 participants suffering from CLBP (n = 10M; 8F) and 18 participants serving as a comparison group (n = 11M; n = 7F). There were no differences in breathing mechanics, diaphragm function or excursion (volumetrics) between people with and without CLBP after 30 minutes of exercises intended to fatigue the diaphragm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The lack of differences suggests that the diaphragm, regardless of its fatigue status as a spinal stabilizer, will not relinquish or weaken its function as a breathing muscle, though it may be less effective as a spinal stabilizer. Individuals with chronic or recurrent low back pain might therefore be more susceptible to subsequent pain flare-ups than non-symptomatic individuals. A potential clinical implication of these findings is that incorporating diaphragmatic breathing exercises to enhance diaphragm function may offer an effective treatment option for patients with CLBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"963-974"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872084/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S496917","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: The diaphragm is an important respiratory muscle that also plays a crucial role in developing intra-abdominal pressure and assisting in spinal stability. Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a complex musculoskeletal condition and has been associated with respiratory problems and altered breathing mechanics. The purpose of this comparative cross-sectional study is to investigate whether diaphragm fatigue affects breathing mechanics and function in individuals with CLBP.

Methods: Volunteers were recruited between the ages of 35-65 years old with and without CLBP. Participants performed 30 minutes of exercises intended to fatigue the diaphragm. The following respiratory parameters were measured: Breathing mechanics (chest and abdominal movement and respiratory rate), diaphragm function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) using a handheld spirometer), and diaphragm movement as measured by sub-diaphragm (L1 to diaphragm domes) volume changes at the end of exhalation and inhalation using MRI scans.

Results: A total of 36 participants were recruited (n = 21M; n = 15F), with 18 participants suffering from CLBP (n = 10M; 8F) and 18 participants serving as a comparison group (n = 11M; n = 7F). There were no differences in breathing mechanics, diaphragm function or excursion (volumetrics) between people with and without CLBP after 30 minutes of exercises intended to fatigue the diaphragm.

Conclusion: The lack of differences suggests that the diaphragm, regardless of its fatigue status as a spinal stabilizer, will not relinquish or weaken its function as a breathing muscle, though it may be less effective as a spinal stabilizer. Individuals with chronic or recurrent low back pain might therefore be more susceptible to subsequent pain flare-ups than non-symptomatic individuals. A potential clinical implication of these findings is that incorporating diaphragmatic breathing exercises to enhance diaphragm function may offer an effective treatment option for patients with CLBP.

慢性腰痛患者的膈肌疲劳不会影响呼吸力学或呼吸功能。
背景和目的:横膈膜是重要的呼吸肌,在产生腹内压力和协助脊柱稳定方面也起着至关重要的作用。慢性腰痛(CLBP)是一种复杂的肌肉骨骼疾病,与呼吸问题和呼吸机制改变有关。本比较横断面研究的目的是探讨膈肌疲劳是否会影响CLBP患者的呼吸力学和功能。方法:招募年龄在35-65岁之间的志愿者,有或没有CLBP。参与者进行了30分钟的锻炼,旨在使膈肌疲劳。测量以下呼吸参数:呼吸力学(胸部和腹部运动和呼吸频率),隔膜功能(使用手持式肺活量计1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)),以及使用MRI扫描通过呼气和吸气结束时的次隔膜(L1到隔膜穹顶)体积变化测量的隔膜运动。结果:共招募了36名参与者(n = 21M;n = 15F), 18名受试者患有CLBP (n = 10M;8F)和18名参与者作为对照组(n = 11M;n = 7F)。经过30分钟的疲劳训练后,有CLBP和没有CLBP的人在呼吸力学、膈肌功能或漂移(体积)方面没有差异。结论:缺乏差异表明,膈肌,不管其作为脊柱稳定剂的疲劳状态,不会放弃或削弱其作为呼吸肌肉的功能,尽管它作为脊柱稳定剂的效果可能较差。因此,患有慢性或复发性腰痛的个体可能比无症状的个体更容易受到随后疼痛发作的影响。这些发现的潜在临床意义是,结合膈肌呼吸练习来增强膈肌功能可能为CLBP患者提供有效的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信